PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,2/10
48 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Chucky regresa para vengarse de Andy, el chico que lo derrotó, ahora un adolescente en la academia militar.Chucky regresa para vengarse de Andy, el chico que lo derrotó, ahora un adolescente en la academia militar.Chucky regresa para vengarse de Andy, el chico que lo derrotó, ahora un adolescente en la academia militar.
- Premios
- 1 premio y 3 nominaciones en total
Brad Dourif
- Chucky
- (voz)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesUnder pressure from Universal, screenwriter Don Mancini was asked to begin writing the third film even before the second film was released. Hence, this picture was released only nine months after Muñeco diabólico 2 (1990). Mancini has called it his least favorite because he felt he was out of ideas so soon after the second installment.
- Pifias(at around 38 mins) Chucky cuts Andy's Achilles tendon from under his bed. Throughout the rest of the movie, Andy should have a limp from such a severe injury. However, he clearly has no trouble walking or running in subsequent scenes, nor does he show any signs of injury.
- Versiones alternativasSeveral scenes cut from original version appear in the USA Network's version:
- Additional dialogue between president of Play Pal toys and his assistant at the very beginning.
- Andy talking with Tyler on the bus taking them to Kent military school;
- a scene with Andy and Tyler talking as Andy is going to his room. Tyler offers to play pool with him but Andy declines;
- Andy and Whitehurst talking outside as they stand at attention just before Shelton steps into the picture;
- Tyler telling Andy how bad his hair looks after they get haircuts.
- Shelton catches Andy & Desilva kissing in woods during wargames.
- After death of garbage man, scene in which Andy is sitting in class, contemplatively, teacher snaps him back into it.
- ConexionesFeatured in Empire of the Censors (1995)
- Banda sonoraSolveig's Song
Composed by Edvard Grieg (as Edvard Greig)
Arranged by Walter Warren (as W. Warren)
Courtesy of Corelli/Jacobs Music
Reseña destacada
While it is not my favourite genre, there is an appreciation for the horror genre. Mainly watched 'Child's Play 3' having decided to recently watch and review all the films in the 'Child's Play'/Chucky series, having been intrigued for a long time by Chucky's horror icon status, a deserved distinction.
Do feel that the character himself is better than the films. The 'Child's Play'/Chucky films are very variable, with the first film being by far the best. None of the sequels are as good, though don't consider them unwatchable. 'Child's Play 3' has been deemed one of the, sometimes the, worst in the series. For me it is definitely the worst of the initial trilogy and although the title for worst is debatable it is a lesser one to me.
There are faults in 'Child's Play 3'. The story is predictable with no originality and too much of it is complete nonsense. Aside from with Chucky, the dialogue is really cheesy and with two exceptions the acting is lacking, Justin Whalin being especially annoying. The romance was a pointless distraction, there seemingly to pad out time, and a few of the characters behave idiotically.
Like the second film there is a rushed feel here, there is a sense of a relatively tight budget (although the film looks good still) and even tighter time constraints. Also felt that whereas the first 'Child's Play' avoided going the cheesy, goofy and formulaic route that it could easily have done considering the premise, 'Child's Play 3' did feel formulaic and too much of it failed to escape the unintentionally.
However, 'Child's Play 3' looks slick and suitably ominous and the special effects don't disappoint, they blend very well, look eerily life-like and move easily. The music is more ambitious and even more haunting here, it fits very well. While lacking the panache of Tom Holland's in the first 'Child's Play', John Lafia's direction is more than competent. Chucky's lines are like in the first two films, darkly witty and clever with one-liners that are smart, frighteningly sarcastic and entertainingly twisted. In terms of individual scenes, the climax comes off best, being a lot of fun
'Child's Play 3' does have entertainment value and some creepiness, with the attack scenes/kills and set pieces being creative and genuinely unsettling. Chucky is a character impossible to forget, the writers and effects team had the time of their lives clearly (as well as Brad Dourif of course). Wasn't crazy about the acting here, but will say that Andrew Robinson has an unsettling ball as his character. The biggest acting plus though, like the previous two films, is Dourif, the personification of malevolence and is also wickedly funny.
In conclusion, watchable but not great by any stretch. 5/10 Bethany Cox
Do feel that the character himself is better than the films. The 'Child's Play'/Chucky films are very variable, with the first film being by far the best. None of the sequels are as good, though don't consider them unwatchable. 'Child's Play 3' has been deemed one of the, sometimes the, worst in the series. For me it is definitely the worst of the initial trilogy and although the title for worst is debatable it is a lesser one to me.
There are faults in 'Child's Play 3'. The story is predictable with no originality and too much of it is complete nonsense. Aside from with Chucky, the dialogue is really cheesy and with two exceptions the acting is lacking, Justin Whalin being especially annoying. The romance was a pointless distraction, there seemingly to pad out time, and a few of the characters behave idiotically.
Like the second film there is a rushed feel here, there is a sense of a relatively tight budget (although the film looks good still) and even tighter time constraints. Also felt that whereas the first 'Child's Play' avoided going the cheesy, goofy and formulaic route that it could easily have done considering the premise, 'Child's Play 3' did feel formulaic and too much of it failed to escape the unintentionally.
However, 'Child's Play 3' looks slick and suitably ominous and the special effects don't disappoint, they blend very well, look eerily life-like and move easily. The music is more ambitious and even more haunting here, it fits very well. While lacking the panache of Tom Holland's in the first 'Child's Play', John Lafia's direction is more than competent. Chucky's lines are like in the first two films, darkly witty and clever with one-liners that are smart, frighteningly sarcastic and entertainingly twisted. In terms of individual scenes, the climax comes off best, being a lot of fun
'Child's Play 3' does have entertainment value and some creepiness, with the attack scenes/kills and set pieces being creative and genuinely unsettling. Chucky is a character impossible to forget, the writers and effects team had the time of their lives clearly (as well as Brad Dourif of course). Wasn't crazy about the acting here, but will say that Andrew Robinson has an unsettling ball as his character. The biggest acting plus though, like the previous two films, is Dourif, the personification of malevolence and is also wickedly funny.
In conclusion, watchable but not great by any stretch. 5/10 Bethany Cox
- TheLittleSongbird
- 12 dic 2018
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Child's Play 3?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Chucky, el muñeco diabólico 3
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 13.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 14.960.255 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 5.718.940 US$
- 2 sept 1991
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 20.560.255 US$
- Duración1 hora 30 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Muñeco diabólico 3 (1991) officially released in India in English?
Responde