PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,6/10
2,4 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaFilmed before a live audience at a North London TV studio.Filmed before a live audience at a North London TV studio.Filmed before a live audience at a North London TV studio.
Ian Anderson
- Self - Jethro Tull
- (metraje de archivo)
Glenn Cornick
- Self - Jethro Tull
- (metraje de archivo)
Clive Bunker
- Self - Jethro Tull
- (metraje de archivo)
Tony Iommi
- Self - Jethro Tull
- (metraje de archivo)
Pete Townshend
- Self - The Who
- (metraje de archivo)
Roger Daltrey
- Self - The Who
- (metraje de archivo)
Keith Moon
- Self - The Who
- (metraje de archivo)
John Entwistle
- Self - The Who
- (metraje de archivo)
Jesse Ed Davis
- Self - Taj Mahal's Guitarist
- (metraje de archivo)
Gary Gilmore
- Self - Taj Mahal's Bassist
- (metraje de archivo)
Chuck Blackwell
- Self - Taj Mahal's Drummer
- (metraje de archivo)
Marianne Faithfull
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
John Lennon
- Self - The Dirty Mac
- (metraje de archivo)
Eric Clapton
- Self - The Dirty Mac
- (metraje de archivo)
Keith Richards
- Self - The Dirty Mac and The Rolling Stones
- (metraje de archivo)
Mitch Mitchell
- Self - The Dirty Mac
- (metraje de archivo)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesFor a fortnight in 1968, future Black Sabbath founder Tony Iommi briefly joined Jethro Tull as lead guitarist. This was his only public appearance with the band, but the performance was mimed - he never played live with Jethro Tull.
- Citas
Mick Jagger: You've heard of Oxford Circus, you've heard of Piccadilly Circus, and this is the Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus, and we've got sights and sounds and marvels to delight your eyes and ears, and you'll be able to see the very first one of those in a few moments.
- Créditos adicionalesSPECIAL THANKS Everyone's Mum...
- ConexionesEdited into The Who : The Kids Are Alright (1979)
- Banda sonoraEntry of the Gladiators
Written by Julius Fucík
Reseña destacada
Filmed live in 1968 as an intended television special but kept from the public eye due to the Rolling Stones' own dissatisfaction with their performance over a span of two nights, "Rock N' Roll Circus" showcases the Stones at the height of their game. Although I admit they have performed better in terms of musical companionship and melody, there is no denying the amount of energy they exude here.
The standout for me is the reggae-infused "Sympathy for the Devil" which sounds like the drunken plea of society's virus. The original came across as a taunt, and this rendition of the song is helpless and a desperate outcry - in a good way, of course.
Mick Jagger's vocals have been better and his voice is a bit off - I guess the guys were totally wasted and stoned out of their minds around this time. But watching them on stage, it's hard to deny they were one of the great rock n' roll bands. They're really not given enough credit for their fusion of blues and mainstream rock - at the time of their emergence, a lot of critics compared them to The Beatles - a comparison both understandable and equally unfair. They did write a few Britpop songs early on, but they always had a bluesy edge that the Beatles - despite their superiority in musical influence and range - never had.
If you're into the Stones, this is a must-see. If you're *really* into the Stones, it's probably a must-own. And if you aren't into the Stones at all, I'd recommend starting off with their double-album Forty Licks (a Greatest Hits compilation).
The standout for me is the reggae-infused "Sympathy for the Devil" which sounds like the drunken plea of society's virus. The original came across as a taunt, and this rendition of the song is helpless and a desperate outcry - in a good way, of course.
Mick Jagger's vocals have been better and his voice is a bit off - I guess the guys were totally wasted and stoned out of their minds around this time. But watching them on stage, it's hard to deny they were one of the great rock n' roll bands. They're really not given enough credit for their fusion of blues and mainstream rock - at the time of their emergence, a lot of critics compared them to The Beatles - a comparison both understandable and equally unfair. They did write a few Britpop songs early on, but they always had a bluesy edge that the Beatles - despite their superiority in musical influence and range - never had.
If you're into the Stones, this is a must-see. If you're *really* into the Stones, it's probably a must-own. And if you aren't into the Stones at all, I'd recommend starting off with their double-album Forty Licks (a Greatest Hits compilation).
- MovieAddict2016
- 13 ago 2006
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Рок-н-ролльный цирк Роллинг Стоунз
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 5 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus (1996) officially released in India in English?
Responde