PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,2/10
1,8 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaBen Kinnear and Mike Paddock are two undercover detectives with way too much publicity.Ben Kinnear and Mike Paddock are two undercover detectives with way too much publicity.Ben Kinnear and Mike Paddock are two undercover detectives with way too much publicity.
- Premios
- 7 nominaciones en total
Danielle McAlpine Johnson
- Promotional Blonde 1
- (as Danielle McAlpine)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDirector Tony Martin had a rule that everyone who worked on the movie had to be seen on screen. Only the focus puller refused, but Martin got lucky when the reflection of that particular crew member is seen in the security guard's window during the Northey/XL9000 scenes. Martin decided not to use optical effects to remove the focus puller so that his rule was obeyed by everyone. Martin reveals this in the DVD commentary.
- Créditos adicionalesThe characters, entities, events and scenes depicted in this film are fictitious. Any similarities to actual persons, living or dead, or to actual entities or events are purely coincidental. Except for the bit where dog bit the sprinkler. That really happened.
- Versiones alternativasDeleted scene included on the DVD:
- Just before the scene with Ben and Julie at the pub, there was a short (29sec) scene where Ben meets Julie at the Melbourne Tribune and makes a half-arsed apology. There follows a joke at the expense of Jerry Maguire (1996).
- ConexionesFeatured in Over Easy: On Location with 'Bad Eggs' (2003)
- Banda sonoraWhere or When
Performed by Frank Sinatra with Count Basie and His Orchestra
Reseña destacada
There are a number of Australian movies around that tend to play up the typical Australian bloke or "sheila" image which quite frankly, make me want to curl up and die in embarrassment. (One of the previews I saw with this movie does nothing to make me think otherwise, a movie called Take Away). Then there are movies like Bad Eggs.
Bad Eggs tends not to try and have a laugh at us Aussies, rather, it aims (and for the most part, succeeds) in going for main stream comedy which could well work for international audiences.
If you can get past the so called "acting"(they are mostly stand up comedians, not thespians)you may end up enjoying a very witty movie, which contains quite a few sight gags, which are very funny. (The one in which the security guard is watching a send up of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? is quite hilarious)
"Imagine what you could do, with that cash bonanza of $478 dollars".
Even if you are not an Aussie, you should still find plenty to laugh at with this movie.
This is without doubt "Champagne comedy"
Bad Eggs tends not to try and have a laugh at us Aussies, rather, it aims (and for the most part, succeeds) in going for main stream comedy which could well work for international audiences.
If you can get past the so called "acting"(they are mostly stand up comedians, not thespians)you may end up enjoying a very witty movie, which contains quite a few sight gags, which are very funny. (The one in which the security guard is watching a send up of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? is quite hilarious)
"Imagine what you could do, with that cash bonanza of $478 dollars".
Even if you are not an Aussie, you should still find plenty to laugh at with this movie.
This is without doubt "Champagne comedy"
- slugerama
- 2 ago 2003
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Bad Eggs?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 4.800.000 AUD (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 1.468.982 US$
- Duración1 hora 38 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Bad Eggs (2003) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde