Añade un argumento en tu idiomaThis anti-porn short film shows a flood tide of filth engulfing the country in the form of newsstand obscenity.This anti-porn short film shows a flood tide of filth engulfing the country in the form of newsstand obscenity.This anti-porn short film shows a flood tide of filth engulfing the country in the form of newsstand obscenity.
- Reparto principal
Damian O'Flynn
- The Judge
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAt one point announcer George Putnam, arguing for the banning of "obscene" materials, says, "This is a nation of laws". The uncredited producer of this film, Charles Keating--the founder of an "anti-pornography" organization called Citizens for Decent Literature, which actually produced the film--was on President Richard Nixon's Presidential Commission on Obscenity and Pornography in 1969. He is the same Charles Keating who, as president of Lincoln Savings & Loan in the late 1980s, was convicted of multiple counts of wire fraud, racketeering and conspiracy due to his involvement in financial shenanigans which led to the collapse of Lincoln Savings, which ultimately cost the US government over $3 billion and which resulted in more than 23,000 depositors losing most or all of the money they had deposited in Lincoln Savings. He served 4-1/2 years in prison before being released in 1996.
- Citas
George Putnam: Hello there. I'm George Putnam. I'd like to begin with a fact, a simple yet shocking fact. It is this - a floodtide of filth is engulfing our country in the form of newsstand obscenity and is threatening to pervert an entire generation of our American children.
- Créditos adicionalesThe opening credits say "with George Putnam, outstanding news reporter"
- ConexionesFeatured in Heavy Petting (1989)
Reseña destacada
Presented and narrated by veteran newscaster and later right-wing pundit George Putnam (A registered Democrat FYI) and funded by fraudster/anti-porn crusader Charles Keating this production is what is often described as the "Reefer Madness of Porn". Various ludicrous postulates of the most alarmist nature are asserted as pure facts.
The censorship brigade which. by the time this was shot and cut. likely shared membership lists with the Temperance Union and other flaky outfits. The sheer panic that somebody might be getting sexual fulfillment literally anywhere probably horrified them enough to get them to watch this silliness over and over.
Even a prude (I'm one of those guys who complains to convenience store owners about porn being in full or partial view of minors) like me was disturbed by the moral arrogance and conspiracy theorist-style paranoia not merely present in the actual production but the forces behind it's conception.
The idea of it all being subversive was of course absurd in most of the examples presented. But the attitude, which at the time was so prevalent. meant that it was an underground industry which mafiosi produced for massive profit which financed other illegal enterprises. The notion that it was a gateway to depravity was only true because it had been driven underground into the clutches of organized crime.
Featured are nudist magazines which were of course just pornography masquerading as lifestyle magazines - a silly pretense employed to vend porn which fooled no one. Along with that are muscle and fitness magazines which in some cases they really were just that, but in other cases were openly gay erotica.
With it's paranoic's homophobic stance and junk science we get an idea of not only of the kind of prudery so dominant before the Sexual Revolution but the kind of virulent prejudice that now appears to have been an inseparable.
Keating, later convicted of fraud, racketeering and conspiracy used his public stance as defender of morality to hide behind. The anti-porn stance was an utterly brilliant way to win the confidence of crazy old ladies with money which they were only to happy to let him make off with in his various scams.
Keating testified before congress that he believed pornography was part of a communist conspiracy. All part of his narrative. All part of his scam.
I'm only guessing that most of the money put up for this production was spent on Putnam's services and his cachet as a news gatherer/presenter. Shot inside an office, with a map of the United States as backdrop and picture cards as props, his voice and presence are the one aspect that aren't bush league.
The censorship brigade which. by the time this was shot and cut. likely shared membership lists with the Temperance Union and other flaky outfits. The sheer panic that somebody might be getting sexual fulfillment literally anywhere probably horrified them enough to get them to watch this silliness over and over.
Even a prude (I'm one of those guys who complains to convenience store owners about porn being in full or partial view of minors) like me was disturbed by the moral arrogance and conspiracy theorist-style paranoia not merely present in the actual production but the forces behind it's conception.
The idea of it all being subversive was of course absurd in most of the examples presented. But the attitude, which at the time was so prevalent. meant that it was an underground industry which mafiosi produced for massive profit which financed other illegal enterprises. The notion that it was a gateway to depravity was only true because it had been driven underground into the clutches of organized crime.
Featured are nudist magazines which were of course just pornography masquerading as lifestyle magazines - a silly pretense employed to vend porn which fooled no one. Along with that are muscle and fitness magazines which in some cases they really were just that, but in other cases were openly gay erotica.
With it's paranoic's homophobic stance and junk science we get an idea of not only of the kind of prudery so dominant before the Sexual Revolution but the kind of virulent prejudice that now appears to have been an inseparable.
Keating, later convicted of fraud, racketeering and conspiracy used his public stance as defender of morality to hide behind. The anti-porn stance was an utterly brilliant way to win the confidence of crazy old ladies with money which they were only to happy to let him make off with in his various scams.
Keating testified before congress that he believed pornography was part of a communist conspiracy. All part of his narrative. All part of his scam.
I'm only guessing that most of the money put up for this production was spent on Putnam's services and his cachet as a news gatherer/presenter. Shot inside an office, with a map of the United States as backdrop and picture cards as props, his voice and presence are the one aspect that aren't bush league.
- JasonDanielBaker
- 13 jun 2012
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Извращение ради прибыли
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración29 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta