PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,5/10
3,7 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una luminaria se estrella contra la Luna, provocando que cambie su órbita y se dirija directamente hacia la Tierra.Una luminaria se estrella contra la Luna, provocando que cambie su órbita y se dirija directamente hacia la Tierra.Una luminaria se estrella contra la Luna, provocando que cambie su órbita y se dirija directamente hacia la Tierra.
- Premios
- 1 premio y 4 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDavid James Elliott and Steven Culp have also starred in the military legal series JAG: Alerta roja (1995).
- PifiasThere are several scenes, particularly at the start of the movie that ignore the fact that the world has multiple time zones. It's not night everywhere.
Reseña destacada
I'm offering this movie a 5 because I feel generous. I mean at least, the kids were looking through the correct side of the telescope and they even depicted a meteor shower relatively accurately. Well, except that the full moon would have made watching a meteor shower much more difficult and that it appeared to be night time, simultaneously, everywhere on Earth. erroneously
Oh my... and did they really need to get a religious debate going in the first few minutes? Really? Was it necessary? Anyhow, this with all the other scientific talk... was mostly nonsense. BTW, Astronomers don't use telescopes to watch meteor showers! Another ridiculous moment is when Natasha Henstridge character kept stating she didn't understand something she clearly should have understood (hint: when an object takes on significantly more mass - Kepler's law clearly states what will happen. It is as if she and the other scientists are unaware of basic physics).
The meteorite hits were rather anticlimactic (read quite unrealistic).
What else did they get right (which helped earn the 5 out of 10)? - Meteorites vs Meteors (right) - Meteorites are not magnetic (mostly true)
Bottom line, this is just a story. Certainly, the events depicted could happen but the reality would be very different. I would have given this story a 7 out of 10 if it had ended at part 1. Part 2, while rather emotional, played out like any other disaster movie with a rather predictable ending.
Oh my... and did they really need to get a religious debate going in the first few minutes? Really? Was it necessary? Anyhow, this with all the other scientific talk... was mostly nonsense. BTW, Astronomers don't use telescopes to watch meteor showers! Another ridiculous moment is when Natasha Henstridge character kept stating she didn't understand something she clearly should have understood (hint: when an object takes on significantly more mass - Kepler's law clearly states what will happen. It is as if she and the other scientists are unaware of basic physics).
The meteorite hits were rather anticlimactic (read quite unrealistic).
What else did they get right (which helped earn the 5 out of 10)? - Meteorites vs Meteors (right) - Meteorites are not magnetic (mostly true)
Bottom line, this is just a story. Certainly, the events depicted could happen but the reality would be very different. I would have given this story a 7 out of 10 if it had ended at part 1. Part 2, while rather emotional, played out like any other disaster movie with a rather predictable ending.
- connelly-shawn
- 24 jun 2009
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Impact have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Impacto (2009)?
Responde