Noé es elegido por Dios para emprender una misión trascendental antes de que un diluvio apocalíptico limpie el mundo.Noé es elegido por Dios para emprender una misión trascendental antes de que un diluvio apocalíptico limpie el mundo.Noé es elegido por Dios para emprender una misión trascendental antes de que un diluvio apocalíptico limpie el mundo.
- Premios
- 1 premio y 19 nominaciones en total
Nick Nolte
- Samyaza
- (voz)
Mark Margolis
- Magog
- (voz)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAccording to writer, producer, and director Darren Aronofsky, the animals seen in this movie are "slightly tweaked designs of real existing animals." No real animals were used in the production at all.
- PifiasAll the animals are sedated and are all seen lying down. An elephant normally only sleeps for about four hours a day. If an elephant were to lie on its side for more than a day (for example) the weight of its internal organs would cause them to rupture and fail.
- Citas
Tubal-cain: I have men at my back, and you stand alone and defy me?
Noah: I'm not alone.
- Créditos adicionalesBesides the title of the movie, there are no opening credits
- ConexionesEdited into Doom and Salvation (2022)
Reseña destacada
Noah (2014)
Ugh. The poor actors, pouring their hearts into this bloated, irrelevant movie. Yeah, the story is really good, at least the parts that we all know so well—the flood, the feeling of starting over, the human angst, or even the idea that there was another (evil) civilization before the flood which is now lost.
Director Darren Aronofsky is of course a creative force with a lot of admirers, and his films are always at least interesting. He took a lot of money here and used some innovative special effects, and he tried to take a slim story (Noah and the Ark) and make it an over-long epic movie, which is daring enough.
But it's not enough to spend a lot on special effects. Not enough to say profound nothings in serious intonations. Not enough to base the story on a great fable (or a bit of history if you're really going to think the flood happened the way it's portrayed) as if you can coattail your way into profit. Or respectability.
Cameron Crowe does a good job being a rugged survivalist in the wastelands that are supposedly the Mideast. (If it looks like Iceland, it's because it is.) His wife is Jennifer Connelly, who is given lines of script to read that make her superfluous (like she'll offer a good suggestion and Crowe, as Noah, says no, let's do it this way instead). Misogyny in action. The kids are archetypally pretty and do a fine job being that, and being there.
I sound almost bitter. It's just (largely) a boring waste. Of course there are, often, redeeming moments—dream sequences that are well done, or scenery that is visually beautiful. I like the idea of Noah struggling with his own values and issues. But this isn't enough to make the long movie work beyond its grandiose effects. Maybe the most interesting thing to happen is that an actual flood, from Hurricane Sandy, interrupted some of the filming in New York where the ark model had been built.
You know whether you like this kind of movie—the Avatar, Prometheus, Braveheart epics —and whether you'll like this one. Those are my least favorite kinds of movies, and this one went frankly the farthest into that overwrought territory. Good luck!
Ugh. The poor actors, pouring their hearts into this bloated, irrelevant movie. Yeah, the story is really good, at least the parts that we all know so well—the flood, the feeling of starting over, the human angst, or even the idea that there was another (evil) civilization before the flood which is now lost.
Director Darren Aronofsky is of course a creative force with a lot of admirers, and his films are always at least interesting. He took a lot of money here and used some innovative special effects, and he tried to take a slim story (Noah and the Ark) and make it an over-long epic movie, which is daring enough.
But it's not enough to spend a lot on special effects. Not enough to say profound nothings in serious intonations. Not enough to base the story on a great fable (or a bit of history if you're really going to think the flood happened the way it's portrayed) as if you can coattail your way into profit. Or respectability.
Cameron Crowe does a good job being a rugged survivalist in the wastelands that are supposedly the Mideast. (If it looks like Iceland, it's because it is.) His wife is Jennifer Connelly, who is given lines of script to read that make her superfluous (like she'll offer a good suggestion and Crowe, as Noah, says no, let's do it this way instead). Misogyny in action. The kids are archetypally pretty and do a fine job being that, and being there.
I sound almost bitter. It's just (largely) a boring waste. Of course there are, often, redeeming moments—dream sequences that are well done, or scenery that is visually beautiful. I like the idea of Noah struggling with his own values and issues. But this isn't enough to make the long movie work beyond its grandiose effects. Maybe the most interesting thing to happen is that an actual flood, from Hurricane Sandy, interrupted some of the filming in New York where the ark model had been built.
You know whether you like this kind of movie—the Avatar, Prometheus, Braveheart epics —and whether you'll like this one. Those are my least favorite kinds of movies, and this one went frankly the farthest into that overwrought territory. Good luck!
- secondtake
- 2 ago 2014
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 125.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 101.200.044 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 43.720.472 US$
- 30 mar 2014
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 359.200.044 US$
- Duración2 horas 18 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta