What Is a Woman?
- 2022
- 1h 35min
Es la pregunta que no hay manera de hacer. El documental que no quieren que veas.Es la pregunta que no hay manera de hacer. El documental que no quieren que veas.Es la pregunta que no hay manera de hacer. El documental que no quieren que veas.
Gert Comfrey
- Self - Gender Affirming Therapist
- (as Gert Comfrey MTS LMFT)
Marci Bowers
- Self - Gender Confirmation Surgeon
- (as Dr. Marci Bowers)
Michelle Forcier
- Self - Pediatrician, Professor
- (as Michelle Forcier MD)
Patrick Grzanka
- Self - Professor, Women Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Tennessee
- (as Dr. Patrick Grzanka)
Miriam Grossman
- Self - Adolescent and Adult Psychiatrist
- (as Miriam Grossman MD)
Rodrigo Lehtinen
- Self - Executive Director, National Center for Transgender Equality
- (as Rodrigo-Heng Lehtinen)
Mark Takano
- Self - D - California
- (as Rep. Mark Takano)
Scott Newgent
- Self - Founder, TReVoices
- (as Scott [Kellie] Newgent)
Sara Stockton
- Self - Clinical Supervisor
- (as Sara Stockton MA LMFT)
Jordan B. Peterson
- Self - Clinical Psychologist, Author
- (as Dr. Jordan Peterson)
Debra Soh
- Self - Author, The End of Gender
- (as Dr. Debra Soh)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDue to controversy, the reviews for the film were hidden on Letterboxd, with blurb reading, "Due to a high volume of moderation traffic, reviews for this title are hidden at this time. Reviews remain visible on members' profiles, with the exception of those removed for violating our Community Policy."
- Citas
Matt Walsh: One of the drugs used is Lupron, right? Which has actually been used to chemically castrate sex offenders?
Self - Pediatrician, Professor: You know what? I'm not sure we should continue with this interview because it seems like it's going in a particular direction.
- ConexionesFeatured in Daily Wire Backstage: What is a Woman? PREMIERE (2022)
- Banda sonoraMan! I Feel Like a Woman!
Performed by Shania Twain
Reseña destacada
So, its fairly well produced, it looks good (certainly comparable to other documentaries out there.) All of the technical aspects of the film are in order. Nothing truly stands out as exceptional, but everything is very much professional.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
- jerrycoliver
- 2 jun 2022
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is What Is a Woman??Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 35 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Hindi language plot outline for What Is a Woman? (2022)?
Responde