Añade un argumento en tu idiomaThe true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.The true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.The true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.
Danika Gould
- Sandra
- (as Danika Galindo)
Sean Gibson
- Bertie
- (sin acreditar)
Mariella Jacqueline
- Title Sequence Girl
- (sin acreditar)
Adam Trash
- Ronnie
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesInspired partly by the 1959 book "The Power of Sexual Surrender" by Marie N. Robinson, M.D.
Reseña destacada
This period movie set in the 1960's documents the sad lifestyle for call girls ensconced in a Hollywood hotel.
The plot is thin, consisting of having the girls each describe their thoughts and memories while bathing or adjusting their lingerie. One of them has a typewriter and proceeds to type while her derriere is prominently visible clad only in her underwear.
If we were in a hidden camera secreted in their boudoirs, you could argue the whole purpose of this movie is voyeurism.
Character development is minimal. So there is no bond between the actors and the audience. The seedier side of the girls' profession and risks they take is glossed over. The only "John" appears late in the sequence and is an equally sad person. The rating for this flick is accurate.
The production quality is claustrophobic and unimaginative with no outdoor shots. The camerawork and direction is adequate.
The script was very boring. There are basically several scenes, which are repeated, like a girl bathing with a soapy rotary dial phone on the edge of the bath tub.
For fans of 1960's big hairstyles and make up, this is a parade of several women coiffing, applying and adjusting their appearances. Otherwise, fast forward through the movie to take in any attractive eye candy that appeals to you.
The plot is thin, consisting of having the girls each describe their thoughts and memories while bathing or adjusting their lingerie. One of them has a typewriter and proceeds to type while her derriere is prominently visible clad only in her underwear.
If we were in a hidden camera secreted in their boudoirs, you could argue the whole purpose of this movie is voyeurism.
Character development is minimal. So there is no bond between the actors and the audience. The seedier side of the girls' profession and risks they take is glossed over. The only "John" appears late in the sequence and is an equally sad person. The rating for this flick is accurate.
The production quality is claustrophobic and unimaginative with no outdoor shots. The camerawork and direction is adequate.
The script was very boring. There are basically several scenes, which are repeated, like a girl bathing with a soapy rotary dial phone on the edge of the bath tub.
For fans of 1960's big hairstyles and make up, this is a parade of several women coiffing, applying and adjusting their appearances. Otherwise, fast forward through the movie to take in any attractive eye candy that appeals to you.
- ade531001
- 3 ene 2020
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Big Hair, Long Lashes?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 10 minutos
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Big Hair, Long Lashes (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde