PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,8/10
5,2 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Es el fin del mundo y se acerca una inundación. Afortunadamente para Dave y su hijo Finny, un par de Nestrianos torpes, se ha construido un Arca para salvar a todos los animales.Es el fin del mundo y se acerca una inundación. Afortunadamente para Dave y su hijo Finny, un par de Nestrianos torpes, se ha construido un Arca para salvar a todos los animales.Es el fin del mundo y se acerca una inundación. Afortunadamente para Dave y su hijo Finny, un par de Nestrianos torpes, se ha construido un Arca para salvar a todos los animales.
- Premios
- 2 premios y 1 nominación en total
Dermot Magennis
- Dave
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Callum Maloney
- Finny
- (English version)
- (voz)
Tara Flynn
- Hazel
- (English version)
- (voz)
Paul Tylak
- Obesey
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Alan Stanford
- Lion
- (English version)
- (voz)
Aileen Mythen
- Mrs. Griffin
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Patrick FitzSymons
- Tanglefoot
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Billy Dobson
- Animals
- (English version)
- (voz)
Chris Evans
- Stayput
- (USA English version)
- (voz)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAlso known as 'Two By Two' in some countries.
- Créditos adicionalesThe first portion of the credits is accompanied by a 2D animated sequence showing what the characters get up to after the flood.
- Versiones alternativasGoogle Play Exclusive Version: Martin Sheen replaces Alan Stanford - Lion (voice) and Amy Grant replaces Tara Flynn - Hazel (voice) Total run time is approx 81 minutes vs approx 86 minutes.
- ConexionesFollowed by ¡Upsss! 2 ¿Y ahora dónde está Noé? (2020)
- Banda sonoraI Got You
Performed by Tara Lee
Composed by Stephen McKeon & Tara Lee
Reseña destacada
Commencing the movie defense in 3... 2... 1!
I, like probably many others, thought this was a generic animated motion picture "for the entire family". I was so wrong. So very wrong. Not only was it not generic; it was way better than expected. After all, it was so good, I am giving it a 9!
Okay, let's start with the premise. It is very simple. A single mother and a single father are separated from their daughter and son (respectively), and need to get back together. The daughter is a hunter-type animal who works alone, and the son is a timid-type animal with a natural gift for building things, and a love for warm hugs. It is one of THOSE movies, with the moral being "we need to work together!" It is, as I said, simple, and not terribly original.
Now, the reason I give this movie a 9 out of 10. Despite the simple old-as-dirt moral, the way it is HANDLED is great. Morals take a backseat, while the front seat gets firmly occupied by the action, the gags, and the dialogue. It is like the movie team were given complete creative freedom to come up with as many interesting scenes as possible, and they done all of them. The timing of the action is great, the lines are great, the voice acting is great, and not a single "funny" moment felt forced (to me anyway, some people are much more picky). Actually, this movie reminds me a lot of Penguins of Madagascar, in the way it's structured (simple moral, but runs on non-stop gags).
The animation has to be mentioned somewhere, so might as well mention it here. It is really good. The only parts where I thought things looked "imperfect", was every time tree branches were used. This animated movie does not have the best looking branches out there. Wood aside, all the textures and atmospheric effects are perfectly fine. And in my books "perfectly fine" equates to "nothing being wrong". The animation itself deserves a 9 as well.
You are probably asking at this point: "But what about the Ark? What about Noah? How are those elements used?" Well, I did not mark this review as containing spoilers, and I am not delivering any. Let's just say, the way the "Ark" part of the story is handled, is the most creative way I ever it seen it handled in any movie. And I'll leave it at that.
I won't spoil the ending either, but I will tell you that I did not see it coming. That was some truly great cartoon writing, and I was pleasantly surprised. Now, to reassure you somewhat, I wasn't born yesterday, and seen and read hundreds of stories. I have frames of reference, and I have developed that thing called "taste". The ending of this movie was GOOD. Trust me on that.
Last, but not least, the movie's title. It was changed for every country it was released in, if I am not mistaken. And it is funny, albeit in a sad way. It can instill the wrong impression upon the potential audience (aka, you), that the people who made this movie did not have any idea what they did. I assure you, the naming problem in no way reflects the actual content, because the movie is great. After all, if it wasn't, I wouldn't give it a 9 out of 10.
Watch it. Now. Don't be afraid. It's really good.
I, like probably many others, thought this was a generic animated motion picture "for the entire family". I was so wrong. So very wrong. Not only was it not generic; it was way better than expected. After all, it was so good, I am giving it a 9!
Okay, let's start with the premise. It is very simple. A single mother and a single father are separated from their daughter and son (respectively), and need to get back together. The daughter is a hunter-type animal who works alone, and the son is a timid-type animal with a natural gift for building things, and a love for warm hugs. It is one of THOSE movies, with the moral being "we need to work together!" It is, as I said, simple, and not terribly original.
Now, the reason I give this movie a 9 out of 10. Despite the simple old-as-dirt moral, the way it is HANDLED is great. Morals take a backseat, while the front seat gets firmly occupied by the action, the gags, and the dialogue. It is like the movie team were given complete creative freedom to come up with as many interesting scenes as possible, and they done all of them. The timing of the action is great, the lines are great, the voice acting is great, and not a single "funny" moment felt forced (to me anyway, some people are much more picky). Actually, this movie reminds me a lot of Penguins of Madagascar, in the way it's structured (simple moral, but runs on non-stop gags).
The animation has to be mentioned somewhere, so might as well mention it here. It is really good. The only parts where I thought things looked "imperfect", was every time tree branches were used. This animated movie does not have the best looking branches out there. Wood aside, all the textures and atmospheric effects are perfectly fine. And in my books "perfectly fine" equates to "nothing being wrong". The animation itself deserves a 9 as well.
You are probably asking at this point: "But what about the Ark? What about Noah? How are those elements used?" Well, I did not mark this review as containing spoilers, and I am not delivering any. Let's just say, the way the "Ark" part of the story is handled, is the most creative way I ever it seen it handled in any movie. And I'll leave it at that.
I won't spoil the ending either, but I will tell you that I did not see it coming. That was some truly great cartoon writing, and I was pleasantly surprised. Now, to reassure you somewhat, I wasn't born yesterday, and seen and read hundreds of stories. I have frames of reference, and I have developed that thing called "taste". The ending of this movie was GOOD. Trust me on that.
Last, but not least, the movie's title. It was changed for every country it was released in, if I am not mistaken. And it is funny, albeit in a sad way. It can instill the wrong impression upon the potential audience (aka, you), that the people who made this movie did not have any idea what they did. I assure you, the naming problem in no way reflects the actual content, because the movie is great. After all, if it wasn't, I wouldn't give it a 9 out of 10.
Watch it. Now. Don't be afraid. It's really good.
- ManWithGoodTaste
- 26 jul 2015
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is All Creatures Big And Small?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- All Creatures Big and Small
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 8.400.000 € (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 22.783.699 US$
- Duración1 hora 27 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was ¡Upsss! ¿Dónde está Noé...? (2015) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde