PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,3/10
11 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.A virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.A virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Shruti Haasan
- Pavazhamani
- (as Shruti K. Haasan)
Thambi Ramaiah
- Kodangi
- (as Thambi Ramayya)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesSri Devi regrets signing on for this movie.
- Versiones alternativasThe UK release was cut, the distributor chose to remove sight of both a blood spurt and a bloody incision across the front of a throat-cutting victim's neck in order to obtain a 12A classification. An uncut 15 classification was available.
- ConexionesReferenced in Amar Akbar Anthony (2015)
Reseña destacada
Too much emphasis on the ingredients that went in to the film, but too little care for the end result? At least that's how I felt watching the movie. The best analogy I could give is trying to create a dish out of other tasty dishes like biryani, payasam, dosa etc., by mixing and mashing them together. By ingredients here, I mean all the characters like Lilliput, talking turtle, one eyed monster, the star cast, Visual effects etc., It's as if the makers were focused primarily on adding as much to the mix as possible.
It's a visual extravaganza for sure, but in the end isn't as engaging as one intend it to be, not by a long shot. I can't pin-point any single aspect because it fails on so many levels. For one the talent of so much star cast seemed to have been wasted. Is it the script? Is it the less than stellar songs and BGM? Is it the mismatch between the stars and the script? You decide. What I can say is that it failed to keep me engaged. Goes to show, just throwing in huge sum of money for extravagant sets, visual effects, big stars is not enough to create a successful movie.
Having said all of this I still gave it 4 stars for the bold attempt, which even though is a failed one. I really wished for this movie to match the hype surrounding it because at the end of the day I want our movie makers to think outside the box and such movies are hard to come by these days. I hope the makers can at least get the money they spent on it back, because I don't want the industry to get discouraged from making such movies.
It's a visual extravaganza for sure, but in the end isn't as engaging as one intend it to be, not by a long shot. I can't pin-point any single aspect because it fails on so many levels. For one the talent of so much star cast seemed to have been wasted. Is it the script? Is it the less than stellar songs and BGM? Is it the mismatch between the stars and the script? You decide. What I can say is that it failed to keep me engaged. Goes to show, just throwing in huge sum of money for extravagant sets, visual effects, big stars is not enough to create a successful movie.
Having said all of this I still gave it 4 stars for the bold attempt, which even though is a failed one. I really wished for this movie to match the hype surrounding it because at the end of the day I want our movie makers to think outside the box and such movies are hard to come by these days. I hope the makers can at least get the money they spent on it back, because I don't want the industry to get discouraged from making such movies.
- dimalatikrit
- 1 oct 2015
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Puli?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 1.800.000.000 INR (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 1.387.272 US$
- Duración2 horas 35 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Puli (2015) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde