CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.9/10
12 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una relación íntima entre un humano y un androide pone a prueba los límites de la naturaleza humana.Una relación íntima entre un humano y un androide pone a prueba los límites de la naturaleza humana.Una relación íntima entre un humano y un androide pone a prueba los límites de la naturaleza humana.
- Premios
- 9 premios ganados y 7 nominaciones en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAt 4:18 the Social Engineer refers to Asimov's laws which follow: First Law: A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. Second Law: A robot must obey orders given to it except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence as long as that protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. The laws were published in science fiction writer Isaac Asimov's 1950 collection "I, Robot".
- Citas
Milutin: I activated Nimani. She looks very lifelike, once you typed in whatever you wanted. Her behavior is not natural. It's just a setup after setup. She does everything you want, but you don't have to fight for it. Don't get to deserve it, just a series of submissions. I don't think you can have a relationship without any refusal, any struggle.
- ConexionesReferences Solaris (1972)
Opinión destacada
Two words: huh & ytho (yes, you have the right image in your head)
85 mins was waaaay too long for this screenplay. I will say the visuals (although 75% repetitive and irrelevant) and the sound/score were the best features of this film. Lastly, it was the awesome directing (his first major film) by novice director Lazar Bodroza, and outstanding cinematography by Kosta Glusica, that offered some redemption for the terrible writing/screenplay by (apparently) seasoned writer Dimitrije Vojnov .
The writing/screenplay had many issues and flawed this film drastically. This was pretty much a Sci-Fi + Soft-Porn = Sci-Porn? Perhaps a good new genre, but not from this film. Then, a spaceship so huge with large empty spaces and basically a computer center in the middle? Unconvincing. Add to the misery completely irrelevant graphic/CGI shots, cheesy command computer dialogue, and consistent high-school puppy love drama. I understand it was a low budget international film, and even moreso for that reason it should have been a short film 20-30 mins long, instead of the slowly paced dragged out long and repetitive sex and boring irrelevant dialogue scenes that made it an unbearable 85 mins. I feel the 'message(s)' this film was trying to tell would have been more effective and obvious as a short, and probably should have been re-made/cut/edited-down as such, seeing this film is based on Zoran Neskovic's 1980's short story.
The acting was between decent and bland, both by Sebastian Cavazza and porn star (yes, you read that right) Stoya.
Would I recommend it? Only if played on a big screen muted with your favorite playlist during a party - only for the visuals. Would I see it again? See previous answer.
A disappointing and underwhelming 4/10 from me
85 mins was waaaay too long for this screenplay. I will say the visuals (although 75% repetitive and irrelevant) and the sound/score were the best features of this film. Lastly, it was the awesome directing (his first major film) by novice director Lazar Bodroza, and outstanding cinematography by Kosta Glusica, that offered some redemption for the terrible writing/screenplay by (apparently) seasoned writer Dimitrije Vojnov .
The writing/screenplay had many issues and flawed this film drastically. This was pretty much a Sci-Fi + Soft-Porn = Sci-Porn? Perhaps a good new genre, but not from this film. Then, a spaceship so huge with large empty spaces and basically a computer center in the middle? Unconvincing. Add to the misery completely irrelevant graphic/CGI shots, cheesy command computer dialogue, and consistent high-school puppy love drama. I understand it was a low budget international film, and even moreso for that reason it should have been a short film 20-30 mins long, instead of the slowly paced dragged out long and repetitive sex and boring irrelevant dialogue scenes that made it an unbearable 85 mins. I feel the 'message(s)' this film was trying to tell would have been more effective and obvious as a short, and probably should have been re-made/cut/edited-down as such, seeing this film is based on Zoran Neskovic's 1980's short story.
The acting was between decent and bland, both by Sebastian Cavazza and porn star (yes, you read that right) Stoya.
Would I recommend it? Only if played on a big screen muted with your favorite playlist during a party - only for the visuals. Would I see it again? See previous answer.
A disappointing and underwhelming 4/10 from me
- Top_Dawg_Critic
- 14 mar 2019
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is A.I. Rising?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 25 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for A.I. Rising (2018)?
Responda