Una pareja de modelos se une a un crucero para los súper ricos.Una pareja de modelos se une a un crucero para los súper ricos.Una pareja de modelos se une a un crucero para los súper ricos.
- Nominado a 3 premios Óscar
- 25 premios ganados y 81 nominaciones en total
Zlatko Buric
- Dimitry
- (as Zlatko Burić)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaCharlbi Dean unexpectedly died shortly after the film's release from sepsis, which was caused by the bacteria called Capnocytophaga. This was complicated by the fact that she had lost her spleen several years before in a car accident. She was just 32.
- ErroresFirst time we see Therese, she has right sided hemiplegia and aphasia both consistent with a left brain infarct. When she is pulled to shore, her hemiplegia switches sides and for the rest of the movie she has left hemiplegia.
- Citas
Clementine: [picking up a live grenade] Winston, look. Isn't this one of ours?
- Versiones alternativasRelease in two versions, one for general worldwide release, and an edited cut for People's Republic of China. Respective runtimes are "2h 27m (147 min)" and "2h 13m (133 min) (Mainland China Censored Version) (China)".
- Bandas sonorasBorn Free
Written by M.I.A. (as Maya Arulpragasam), Dave Taylor, Alan Vega, Martin Rev and John Hill
Performed by M.I.A.
© Concord Copyrights London Ltd, Saturn Strip Ltd, Switch Werd Music/Rodeoman Music © WC Music Corp. administered by Warner Chappell Music Scandinavia P 2010
Licensed courtesy of XL Recordings Ltd
Opinión destacada
First of all, there is no earthly reason this movie needs to be 2 hours and 27 minutes. None. 147 minutes of beating home with sledgehammer efficiency, the prevalence of socio-economic injustice, the perverse obsession with the superficial over the substantial, and gender inequity. The exposing and mocking of which, I am 100% supportive! But the execution is so lazy and repetitive that, even though the core message is admirable, this can hardly be considered enjoyable, much less enlightening.
Now, I love a slow burn. I like long films. And I definitely like films that have something to say. But in all honesty, this film could have been cut by 1/3rd and spared the audience a lot of pain. Every scene is too long, starting from the very first one. There certainly is a message of gender-reversed exploitation to be made, but how long does it really need to take? And the awkwardness of Carl and Yaya's evening is excruciatingly drawn out, exacerbated by the dull and fractional dialogue (though this could be mitigated by the characters being dull and fractional themselves). Even the aftermath of the Captain's Dinner is gratuitously long and boring (I won't even bring in 'disgusting', because that frankly isn't even the issue.) It must be meant for an audience unfamiliar with subtlety in film, but there's no way that target audience has the attention span for such a drawn out film.
Only the 3rd chapter (which deep down somewhere, I knew *had* to be coming, though I'd hoped credits would role at the end of Chapter 2) was even remotely interesting. Two hours of laborious setup to reveal what we already knew in the first place, and had been very obviously foreshadowed from the first moments on the yacht. Take a bit of The Menu and add some Lord of the Flies, but the total is less than the sum of its parts.
Now, I love a slow burn. I like long films. And I definitely like films that have something to say. But in all honesty, this film could have been cut by 1/3rd and spared the audience a lot of pain. Every scene is too long, starting from the very first one. There certainly is a message of gender-reversed exploitation to be made, but how long does it really need to take? And the awkwardness of Carl and Yaya's evening is excruciatingly drawn out, exacerbated by the dull and fractional dialogue (though this could be mitigated by the characters being dull and fractional themselves). Even the aftermath of the Captain's Dinner is gratuitously long and boring (I won't even bring in 'disgusting', because that frankly isn't even the issue.) It must be meant for an audience unfamiliar with subtlety in film, but there's no way that target audience has the attention span for such a drawn out film.
Only the 3rd chapter (which deep down somewhere, I knew *had* to be coming, though I'd hoped credits would role at the end of Chapter 2) was even remotely interesting. Two hours of laborious setup to reveal what we already knew in the first place, and had been very obviously foreshadowed from the first moments on the yacht. Take a bit of The Menu and add some Lord of the Flies, but the total is less than the sum of its parts.
- bjhex1
- 26 feb 2023
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Triangle of Sadness?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Triangle of Sadness
- Locaciones de filmación
- Chiliadou beach, Evoia, Grecia(group stranded on the beach)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- EUR 10,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,608,096
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 214,602
- 9 oct 2022
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 26,214,659
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 27 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.40 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the streaming release date of El Triángulo De La Tristeza (2022) in Australia?
Responda