CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.8/10
4.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Cuatro geólogos buscan diamantes en el desierto de Siberia.Cuatro geólogos buscan diamantes en el desierto de Siberia.Cuatro geólogos buscan diamantes en el desierto de Siberia.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Innokentiy Smoktunovskiy
- Konstantin Sabinin
- (as I. Smoktunovskiy)
Tatyana Samoylova
- Tanya
- (as T. Samoylova)
Vasiliy Livanov
- Andrey
- (as V. Livanov)
Evgeniy Urbanskiy
- Sergey Stepanovich
- (as Ye. Urbanskiy)
Galina Kozhakina
- Vera
- (as G. Kozhakina)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIn 1995 the film was restored by and shown in United States upon the financial support from Francis Coppola.
- Citas
Andrey: Sergei, you've fallen in love with a girl who loves someone else, and that man loves her. From the moral standpoint it's wrong.
Sergey Stepanovich: I don't give a damn about your bookish morale. I'm in love.
Andrey: That's an egoist speaking.
- ConexionesFeatured in Fejezetek a film történetéböl: A szovjet film 1953-1970 (1990)
Opinión destacada
Loss, purpose, and redemption, all in this harrowing adventure and visual tour-de-force by usual suspects Kalatozov/ Urusevsky.
An expedition of diamond hunters is dropped in the Siberian plateau with the mission of discovering a rumoured diamond vein. In the course of the movie diamonds acquire a further symbolic aspect as the purpose in life. As the expedition is befallen by a raging fire and forced to make a hazardous escape through burning logs, saving the map which points to the location of the much sought-after diamonds becomes a struggle to preserve purpose and meaning in a world that defies it. As the surviving members of the expedition stagger through the charred landscape, amidst billows of smoke and torrents of rain, nothing there to answer their pleas and curses but the echo of their voices, the world seems indifferent to their plight.
The star of the movie however is Urusevsky's cinematography. Kalatozov fails to harness his tremendous visual talent as he did in THE CRANES ARE FLYING, certain scenes flailing for attention but lacking the dramatic pull to justify them, but still someone who likes movies for their pictorial quality, for the endless possibilities of capturing images with a photographic lens and moving inside a thridimensional canvas; such a person will be left in awe and admiration of what Urusevsky achieves. His rapid tracking shots through branches of trees, as though the nature conspires to ensnare the protagonists, the amazing clarity of the closeups, the maize of hand-held shots thrusting the viewer right there in the middle of the action, the beautiful dutch angles transforming the geography of the landscape into something that can only exist for and by the camera.
Although the plot has its heart in the right place, much like its predecessor, it suffers from being too overwrought and from lapsing into moments of melodrama. Plot threads that are emphasized early on, like Sergei's unrequisite love and the growing tension with Tanya, are never really resolved and come to a screeching halt when the fire erupts. Traditional Soviet values, like the leader's dream of a Diamond City and the portrayal of civilization as a collective good, don't chime with my sensibilities. The score is often jarring and obtrusive but that's 50's cinema for you.
Overall this is a visually marvellous film aimed at the cinephiles who can appreciate such things.
An expedition of diamond hunters is dropped in the Siberian plateau with the mission of discovering a rumoured diamond vein. In the course of the movie diamonds acquire a further symbolic aspect as the purpose in life. As the expedition is befallen by a raging fire and forced to make a hazardous escape through burning logs, saving the map which points to the location of the much sought-after diamonds becomes a struggle to preserve purpose and meaning in a world that defies it. As the surviving members of the expedition stagger through the charred landscape, amidst billows of smoke and torrents of rain, nothing there to answer their pleas and curses but the echo of their voices, the world seems indifferent to their plight.
The star of the movie however is Urusevsky's cinematography. Kalatozov fails to harness his tremendous visual talent as he did in THE CRANES ARE FLYING, certain scenes flailing for attention but lacking the dramatic pull to justify them, but still someone who likes movies for their pictorial quality, for the endless possibilities of capturing images with a photographic lens and moving inside a thridimensional canvas; such a person will be left in awe and admiration of what Urusevsky achieves. His rapid tracking shots through branches of trees, as though the nature conspires to ensnare the protagonists, the amazing clarity of the closeups, the maize of hand-held shots thrusting the viewer right there in the middle of the action, the beautiful dutch angles transforming the geography of the landscape into something that can only exist for and by the camera.
Although the plot has its heart in the right place, much like its predecessor, it suffers from being too overwrought and from lapsing into moments of melodrama. Plot threads that are emphasized early on, like Sergei's unrequisite love and the growing tension with Tanya, are never really resolved and come to a screeching halt when the fire erupts. Traditional Soviet values, like the leader's dream of a Diamond City and the portrayal of civilization as a collective good, don't chime with my sensibilities. The score is often jarring and obtrusive but that's 50's cinema for you.
Overall this is a visually marvellous film aimed at the cinephiles who can appreciate such things.
- chaos-rampant
- 18 feb 2009
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Letter Never Sent?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Letter Never Sent
- Locaciones de filmación
- Mosfilm Studios, Moscú, Rusia(Studio)
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 36 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was La carta que no se envió (1960) officially released in India in English?
Responda