CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.3/10
15 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Candyman llega a Nueva Orleans y posa su mirada en una joven cuya familia quedó arruinada por el asesino inmortal años antes.Candyman llega a Nueva Orleans y posa su mirada en una joven cuya familia quedó arruinada por el asesino inmortal años antes.Candyman llega a Nueva Orleans y posa su mirada en una joven cuya familia quedó arruinada por el asesino inmortal años antes.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaBernard Rose originally conceived a sequel to his 1992 hit Candyman (1992) as not featuring the eponymous character at all but instead continuing to explore the nature of urban horror myths. This was quickly scotched when the producers figured that audiences would show up because they wanted to see Candyman eviscerate his victims.
- ErroresAs Annie's brother falls down the steps, he is obviously replaced by a stuntman with long hair.
Opinión destacada
I think the original Candyman is a very good horror film and builds upon the mythos of such urban legends as "Bloody Mary" and so on and so forth. It didn't feature the best acting in the world but it was suitable and the atmosphere was very scary.
The sequel, "Candyman II: Farewell to the Flesh," is as most horror sequels typically are -- inferior and less scary. It's like "Halloween II," "Friday the 13th Part II" and "Psycho II": not as good as the original! Yet for what it is, "Candyman II" is quite entertaining, and still manages to remain rather atmospheric. The film takes place in New Orleans around the Mardi Gras and it's got some good scary segments. Some aren't so scary but are fun to watch. We know what's going to happen but it's still entertaining.
No this isn't expertly made but it isn't mind-numbingly bad as some of the genre are. Basically it's loads of blood but it also retains its creepy cinematography and the direction is better than expected.
Overall this kept me entertained, which is all I expected in the first place.
The sequel, "Candyman II: Farewell to the Flesh," is as most horror sequels typically are -- inferior and less scary. It's like "Halloween II," "Friday the 13th Part II" and "Psycho II": not as good as the original! Yet for what it is, "Candyman II" is quite entertaining, and still manages to remain rather atmospheric. The film takes place in New Orleans around the Mardi Gras and it's got some good scary segments. Some aren't so scary but are fun to watch. We know what's going to happen but it's still entertaining.
No this isn't expertly made but it isn't mind-numbingly bad as some of the genre are. Basically it's loads of blood but it also retains its creepy cinematography and the direction is better than expected.
Overall this kept me entertained, which is all I expected in the first place.
- MovieAddict2016
- 17 jun 2005
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 6,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 13,940,383
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 6,046,825
- 19 mar 1995
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 13,940,383
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Candyman 2: el terror (1995) officially released in India in Hindi?
Responda