CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.1/10
63 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
La película de un productor corre peligro cuando su estrella se larga, por lo que decide crear digitalmente una actriz para sustituirla, convirtiéndose de la noche a la mañana en un éxito qu... Leer todoLa película de un productor corre peligro cuando su estrella se larga, por lo que decide crear digitalmente una actriz para sustituirla, convirtiéndose de la noche a la mañana en un éxito que todos creen que es una persona real.La película de un productor corre peligro cuando su estrella se larga, por lo que decide crear digitalmente una actriz para sustituirla, convirtiéndose de la noche a la mañana en un éxito que todos creen que es una persona real.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Rachel Roberts
- Simone
- (as Simone)
Carole Androsky
- Premiere Audience Member
- (as Carol Androsky)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAfter seeing the photorealism of the computer generated actors in Final Fantasy: El espíritu en nosotros (2001), the producers started to lean toward the idea of having Simone actually be a computer generated actress. However, after heavy opposition from the Screen Actor's Guild, claiming in so many words that replacement of actors in ALL movies would be the next logical step, the idea was scrapped.
- ErroresUnder present Academy rules a performer can be nominated for only one performance in any acting category. This rule is broken deliberately - Simone is so wonderful that the Academy is prepared to break its own rules for her.
- Créditos curiososDespite the fact he has an important role in the film, Elias Koteas who plays Hank is not credited.
- Versiones alternativasIn the initial August 2002 theatrical release, Rachel Roberts, the actress who portrays "most aspects" of Simone, is uncredited. According to an Associated Press interview with Roberts published after the film's release, this will be changed in the video release so that Roberts is credited.
- ConexionesFeatured in Great Movie Mistakes 2: The Sequel (2011)
- Bandas sonorasAdagio for Strings
Written by Samuel Barber
Performed by Dale Warland Singers
Courtesy of American Choral Catalogue
Opinión destacada
Ever since I first saw Gattaca, I've been looking for other films directed by Andrew Niccol. This being one of them, and so far, one of the only ones(but I certainly hope he makes more films in the future... he has some very interesting ideas), I simply had to watch. I was not disappointed. Like Gattaca, this is science fiction; however, Gattaca is more of a all-out sci-fi film, and S1m0ne only has some elements of science fiction. Before I comment on the sci-fi, I must comment on the great humor in the film. This is the first of Niccol's films(Truman Show, Gattaca and then this) I've seen that has comedy(in the form of satire, that is). Truly great comedy, as well. You know why? Because it's real. It's stuff that we can recognize, stuff that we know from ourselves, from the people around us. The comedy mostly revolves around how easily everyone is tricked, how quick they are to believe in something without any proof. I believe it was Voltaire who said: "If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent one". We want to be deceived, we want to be tricked, we want to have something to hope for and believe in. I mean, let's be honest; that is the very basis for why religion exists, and why people claim to spot UFOs. People need to believe in something... and they believe in Simone. Despite what her maker has her do, despite no one ever having met her in person, people love her. They need to. They need someone, something to believe in. The many scenes of Viktor covering up Simone not being real, creating the illusion of her in various forms to satisfy other people's urge to see her, meet her, talk to her may be somewhat slapstick in their nature, but they only emphasize how ludicrous and easily bought the everyday man is. They want to believe it so badly, they simply can't accept anything else. This seems to be what most critics of this film are missing. Their refusal to accept it is simply them denying human nature. As Pacino's character realizes near the end: "She's indestructible". It is not possible to remove her, because the public won't accept it. She must exist. I noticed a lot of references to the story of Frankenstein in this film. It is basically the 21st century's version of Frankenstein, with some computer-based science fiction elements and set in Hollywood. I have never seen a film that so openly mocks the superficiality of Hollywood, and for that reason alone, anyone should see it. The plot is very good, though it develops at a somewhat uneven pace... in fact, the pacing seems a tad off. The acting is mostly very good. The special effects are top-notch... they were in 2002, and they still are. This could have been better, but it was still very good. I recommend this to anyone who is interested from reading the plot outline, people who enjoyed Gattaca and fans of science fiction as commentary on real issues. 7/10
- TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews
- 15 jun 2005
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is S1m0ne?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 10,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 9,688,676
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 3,813,463
- 25 ago 2002
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 19,576,023
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 57 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta