CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.5/10
9.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
En el sombrío paisaje del delta del Mississippi, un boxeador a mano limpia intenta saldar sus deudas en un último y desesperado intento por salvar la casa familiar de su moribunda madre adop... Leer todoEn el sombrío paisaje del delta del Mississippi, un boxeador a mano limpia intenta saldar sus deudas en un último y desesperado intento por salvar la casa familiar de su moribunda madre adoptiva.En el sombrío paisaje del delta del Mississippi, un boxeador a mano limpia intenta saldar sus deudas en un último y desesperado intento por salvar la casa familiar de su moribunda madre adoptiva.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The movie's alright. Nothing so special about it but also it's not bad either. Since it's not a blockbuster or whatever I didn't put too much expectation on it so I feel like it's a decent one to just casually watch. Of course you are not getting crazy deep thoughts out of the movie. It tells a story and that's it, which for me is easy to understand (I haven't read the book, though).
There was action and fighting which I think was good enough with some being really nice, still I do need a little bit more action. The emotions were there and I appreciate that they tried to establish something but for me it's quite a bit over the top as it seems there was only a way to show the emotional connection so it kinda gets repetitive over time. Apart from that, everything else was fine, the characters had their roles, the color and lightning in some scenes were good which pleased my eyes.
Aaron Eckhart did his job well as always. The child actor (Michael A. Waycaster) was pretty good.
Solid 6.5 for me but props to some really nice scenes I'll give it a 7.
There was action and fighting which I think was good enough with some being really nice, still I do need a little bit more action. The emotions were there and I appreciate that they tried to establish something but for me it's quite a bit over the top as it seems there was only a way to show the emotional connection so it kinda gets repetitive over time. Apart from that, everything else was fine, the characters had their roles, the color and lightning in some scenes were good which pleased my eyes.
Aaron Eckhart did his job well as always. The child actor (Michael A. Waycaster) was pretty good.
Solid 6.5 for me but props to some really nice scenes I'll give it a 7.
And not even Aaron Eckhart is very good. Well, he is in a way but I sure do not believe in his character one bit. And the girl playing the Lady with tattoos is just plain a horrible actress. I think the only believable person / character is the Circus Director. The story is simple and the efforts to infuse this with "heartfelt moments" are just lengthy and tragic: In fact the whole middle part of the movie is more or less these slow and horribly boring heartfelt moments. The bare knuckle fighting that was advertised did not even try to be believable and in any case he constantly used brass knuckles.
Jack Boucher (Aaron Eckhart) is a bare knuckle fighter struggling with hallucinations after years of underground fights. He gets kidnapped by a lowlife for his large debt to Big Momma Sweet (Marianne Jean-Baptiste). He manages to crash the truck and escape. A traveling carnival happens upon the crash site. Annette (Bella Thorne) is the tattooed erotica lady.
This is an amazing performance from Eckhart. The plot is a bit of a mess. I put half of it to the unstable mind of Jack Boucher. The other half is still a mess. There is some good atmosphere, but the plot construction is wrong. I actually watched this and Michael Farris Smith's other movie Desperation Road back to back. There is a connecting style between the two gothic southern crime drama. I like the style, but this writing is not good enough.
This is an amazing performance from Eckhart. The plot is a bit of a mess. I put half of it to the unstable mind of Jack Boucher. The other half is still a mess. There is some good atmosphere, but the plot construction is wrong. I actually watched this and Michael Farris Smith's other movie Desperation Road back to back. There is a connecting style between the two gothic southern crime drama. I like the style, but this writing is not good enough.
I really don't have much to say about this one but the fact that so many are giving it bad reviews is why I am writing this so that it can boost the ratings.
Like alot have said, it's not an A list movie. There's nothing extra ordinary here. It's just a simple story of an ex fighter turned drunk who owes big momma and has to find a way to pay back. That's it.
However, unlike most people, I think it's a beautiful picture. I loved most of the acting and there were a few moments of laughter. I wouldn't say it's an amazing movie, but I won't rubbish it either. Just a good ol Sunday afternoon kinda movie.
Like alot have said, it's not an A list movie. There's nothing extra ordinary here. It's just a simple story of an ex fighter turned drunk who owes big momma and has to find a way to pay back. That's it.
However, unlike most people, I think it's a beautiful picture. I loved most of the acting and there were a few moments of laughter. I wouldn't say it's an amazing movie, but I won't rubbish it either. Just a good ol Sunday afternoon kinda movie.
Who would have thought that this adaptation was interesting to be carried out?
Who can think that Bella Thorne could act?
What wrong has Aaron Eckhart done to go from playing an iconic Batman character to this impossible to sustain parody in 15 years?
Surely these are questions that will never have answers.
This film, based on a book, deals with the life of a boxer from the underworld and his (not very credible) story of overcoming and suffering.
Gambler, alcoholic, absent father and addict, a combination that leads to a plot that is difficult to grasp wherever you try.
You can watch it in the background on a Saturday afternoon and not much more.
I return to one of my initial questions: what wrong has Aaron Eckhart done? At 56 years old, it seems that his career is over if he doesn't make some good decision regarding leading roles...
Who can think that Bella Thorne could act?
What wrong has Aaron Eckhart done to go from playing an iconic Batman character to this impossible to sustain parody in 15 years?
Surely these are questions that will never have answers.
This film, based on a book, deals with the life of a boxer from the underworld and his (not very credible) story of overcoming and suffering.
Gambler, alcoholic, absent father and addict, a combination that leads to a plot that is difficult to grasp wherever you try.
You can watch it in the background on a Saturday afternoon and not much more.
I return to one of my initial questions: what wrong has Aaron Eckhart done? At 56 years old, it seems that his career is over if he doesn't make some good decision regarding leading roles...
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAlthough Aaron Eckhart has an affinity for horses, he's never won a triple crown event.
- ErroresBig Mama's branding iron couldn't be made red hot by holding it against a little travel iron that couldn't get red hot itself. To brand human skin, an iron doesn't have to be red hot any way nor does it have to be held against the skin for more than a few seconds.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Rumble Through the Dark?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Гул крізь темряву
- Locaciones de filmación
- Natchez, Mississippi, Estados Unidos(Exterior fight scenes)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 56min(116 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta