CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.5/10
7.9 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Charles es un mujeriego y Elaine una cazafortunas. El dúo aprende humanidad cuando se ven obligados a formar equipo y a perseguir a dobles robóticos de sí mismos.Charles es un mujeriego y Elaine una cazafortunas. El dúo aprende humanidad cuando se ven obligados a formar equipo y a perseguir a dobles robóticos de sí mismos.Charles es un mujeriego y Elaine una cazafortunas. El dúo aprende humanidad cuando se ven obligados a formar equipo y a perseguir a dobles robóticos de sí mismos.
Nicholas Rutherford
- Ted Jr.
- (as Nick Rutherford)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaEmma Roberts was originally cast in the lead role until being replaced by Shailene Woodley.
- ErroresCharles and Elaine argue over who gets to sleep in the single armchair, when the house, owned by his rich stepfather, surely had a bedroom. They simply could have retrieved a mattress and put in near the fire to stay warm. Although a rich person would more than likely have a heating system for such a house.
- Citas
Charles Cameron: Best day of my life.
Elaine: Who says that when a womanizer and a gold digger get together things don't turn out well for either of them?
- Bandas sonorasBoll Weevil
Written by Charley Patton (as Charlie Patton)
Performed by Drew Taubenfeld, Brian Whelan, and David Steele
Opinión destacada
What we have here seems like a silly sci-fi romcom, it even works as such. But upon closer inspection you'll realize most of the jokes are aimed not at the characters on screen but rather at us, the viewers. The characters themselves are well written and well performed cartoons with single characteristic driving each of them, not with a fully developed character, they should have if they're to pass as relatable humans. Which means - what we're watching is in-fact a satire not a romcom. But since satire is often confused with comedy and comedy does sell better, it does make sense to disguise it as a silly rom-com.
Do have a closer look, you'll see the point is our never-ending quest for leisurely carefree living with as little regard as possible to anyone but us. So what would happen if we did get robots to do all our dirty jobs. What if we could build them to look exactly like us. Yes that would be illegal but when did the law stop anyone with enough money from breaching it. So this "what's if", is the starting point of this very clever movie. I won't tell you any more on the plot. Ill only mention the single major fault of this movie - a forced ending meant to suite its rom-com disguise. I'd rate it much higher without this forced end. Still, it's a fun clever movie worth your time.
Do have a closer look, you'll see the point is our never-ending quest for leisurely carefree living with as little regard as possible to anyone but us. So what would happen if we did get robots to do all our dirty jobs. What if we could build them to look exactly like us. Yes that would be illegal but when did the law stop anyone with enough money from breaching it. So this "what's if", is the starting point of this very clever movie. I won't tell you any more on the plot. Ill only mention the single major fault of this movie - a forced ending meant to suite its rom-com disguise. I'd rate it much higher without this forced end. Still, it's a fun clever movie worth your time.
- ayoreinf
- 31 may 2023
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Robots?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 225,065
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 33 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Robots (2023) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Responda