Andy y su equipo de guerreros inmortales continúan su misión de proteger a la humanidad. Esta vez, un nuevo y formidable enemigo amenaza el tejido mismo de la Vieja Guardia.Andy y su equipo de guerreros inmortales continúan su misión de proteger a la humanidad. Esta vez, un nuevo y formidable enemigo amenaza el tejido mismo de la Vieja Guardia.Andy y su equipo de guerreros inmortales continúan su misión de proteger a la humanidad. Esta vez, un nuevo y formidable enemigo amenaza el tejido mismo de la Vieja Guardia.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Veronica Ngo
- Quynh
- (as Veronica Ngô)
Kamil Nozynski
- Louis
- (as Kamil Nożyński)
Christophe Tek
- Watch Officer
- (as Christophe R. Tek)
Peter Arpesella
- Officer
- (voz)
- (sin créditos)
Todd Cattell
- Booker
- (voz)
- (sin créditos)
Jacob Katana
- Korean Pedestrian (Businessman)
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
Far from the first one. While it was not any kind of masterpiece, it was entertaining and presented an interesting group of characyers.
This second part is dull as hell. It starts ok and then it (and the audience) falls asleep. Pretty much half of the movie is about manifesting drama out of nothing by lingering on facial expressions for waaaay toooo loooong (stare at face, stare at the opposing face, don't say a word, just stare, repeat with the next scene, and no movement do not move while this happens, stop the world from revolving so everyone can stare and really analyse those expressions in detail). The actors do ok but in my opinion they are very limited by this style of directing where every line on dialogue is delivered when the world basically stops during thesw scenes (this seems to be very common these days). I do not need to stare at faces or hear their names repeated every other sentence. This just feels lifeless and kind of unnatural.
While some of all this babbling provides more backstory and perhaps a hint of world building, it is a very small part of the movie. Some things are also repeated like six times in a row when they were already obvious. "So there's this myth that tells about a thing that happens when a specific immortal does this other thing to another immortal." (points to a random book with a couple of colorfull images). The othe guy basically replies, "Aah... so that happened because they did that things in the last movie". Oh yeah dudes, please repeat it again, please, I didn't already figure it out ages ago. I literally skipped ahead in some scenes because they took waaayyyy tooo looong. I would have much rather seen much more of the lore and spent much more times digging up the past, like actually researching things instead of just walking into this cool ancient library which apparently contained all the lore and history of the immortals. There was even this whole encyclopedia set about The Old Guard and it was stolen, which we see in a useless dreamclip - useless because it just shows them being taken and nothing about why or how that moment came to be, and also the librarian says this afterwards just to make sure that we got it. The whole movie kind of skips over everything that would have served as a great basis for a real sequel. Could have even been a prequel that would have given much more context and depth to everything. Now this is all super simple and apparently just a matter of walking into a library that almost no one knew existed (except the main character and the librarian, obviously).
There is rather little action and most and when it starts the movie actually ends. Someone probably yelled "We're running out of film in two minutes!" and they just cut it short in the middle of a scene almost. Perhaps the third one is supposed to give Uma Thurman's cahracter some substance because here she is pretty much useless. And maybe it will explore the past more in general. Who knows. I'll still watch it but I won't be expecting it wven nearly as much as I did this.
This second part is dull as hell. It starts ok and then it (and the audience) falls asleep. Pretty much half of the movie is about manifesting drama out of nothing by lingering on facial expressions for waaaay toooo loooong (stare at face, stare at the opposing face, don't say a word, just stare, repeat with the next scene, and no movement do not move while this happens, stop the world from revolving so everyone can stare and really analyse those expressions in detail). The actors do ok but in my opinion they are very limited by this style of directing where every line on dialogue is delivered when the world basically stops during thesw scenes (this seems to be very common these days). I do not need to stare at faces or hear their names repeated every other sentence. This just feels lifeless and kind of unnatural.
While some of all this babbling provides more backstory and perhaps a hint of world building, it is a very small part of the movie. Some things are also repeated like six times in a row when they were already obvious. "So there's this myth that tells about a thing that happens when a specific immortal does this other thing to another immortal." (points to a random book with a couple of colorfull images). The othe guy basically replies, "Aah... so that happened because they did that things in the last movie". Oh yeah dudes, please repeat it again, please, I didn't already figure it out ages ago. I literally skipped ahead in some scenes because they took waaayyyy tooo looong. I would have much rather seen much more of the lore and spent much more times digging up the past, like actually researching things instead of just walking into this cool ancient library which apparently contained all the lore and history of the immortals. There was even this whole encyclopedia set about The Old Guard and it was stolen, which we see in a useless dreamclip - useless because it just shows them being taken and nothing about why or how that moment came to be, and also the librarian says this afterwards just to make sure that we got it. The whole movie kind of skips over everything that would have served as a great basis for a real sequel. Could have even been a prequel that would have given much more context and depth to everything. Now this is all super simple and apparently just a matter of walking into a library that almost no one knew existed (except the main character and the librarian, obviously).
There is rather little action and most and when it starts the movie actually ends. Someone probably yelled "We're running out of film in two minutes!" and they just cut it short in the middle of a scene almost. Perhaps the third one is supposed to give Uma Thurman's cahracter some substance because here she is pretty much useless. And maybe it will explore the past more in general. Who knows. I'll still watch it but I won't be expecting it wven nearly as much as I did this.
My god why?
I am a lover of entertainment. I respect the films by what they are. That is why i love(d) fast and the furious franchise, mission: impossible, heck, i loved the other guys and movies like that. And i loved the first movie, the old guard.
But what is this? Half a movie? And so poorly paced, made, no momentum, no passion or ideas.... how does netflix do it? How can it aim and achoe the worst possible outcome?? That is why alghoritms are no match for criativity and art. Aiming at everyone, the please no one. It sucks.
I wish they let writera write and produce good content. Look at Apple. They are killing it!
I am a lover of entertainment. I respect the films by what they are. That is why i love(d) fast and the furious franchise, mission: impossible, heck, i loved the other guys and movies like that. And i loved the first movie, the old guard.
But what is this? Half a movie? And so poorly paced, made, no momentum, no passion or ideas.... how does netflix do it? How can it aim and achoe the worst possible outcome?? That is why alghoritms are no match for criativity and art. Aiming at everyone, the please no one. It sucks.
I wish they let writera write and produce good content. Look at Apple. They are killing it!
What was that? Where did the second half of the film go? My five points are lenient, as I like the first movie, the story, and the actors. I was really excited about this film and also curious to see what would become of Quynh after lying at the bottom of the sea for 500 years and dying about 4 million times. That must do something to you. But no! After 45 minutes, I was wondering when the film would finally start. It was so slow, and ultimately the story is just boring. Just as disappointing as Highlander 2 ;-). And shortly before the end, I realized that this film has no ending, and Netflix had simply ripped me off.
I quite enjoyed the original film and was excited when this came out.
Unfortunately, it's chock full of lazy writing with some mediocre acting sprinkled in. It dragged on and on, and when things started to look interesting, the movie ended! I wouldn't event call that a cliffhanger - that would imply something interesting that didn't conclude. This was not interesting. This left a bad taste in the mouth.
There were a couple really lame attempts at humor that fell flat.
You just get the impression they were bent on making this sequel into 2 parts. This being a primer for a finale. Except this is a terrible ad for that finale.
Someone called this the "typical sequel" and sadly, that's true. This was badly made.
5/10 is generous for this flick.
Unfortunately, it's chock full of lazy writing with some mediocre acting sprinkled in. It dragged on and on, and when things started to look interesting, the movie ended! I wouldn't event call that a cliffhanger - that would imply something interesting that didn't conclude. This was not interesting. This left a bad taste in the mouth.
There were a couple really lame attempts at humor that fell flat.
You just get the impression they were bent on making this sequel into 2 parts. This being a primer for a finale. Except this is a terrible ad for that finale.
Someone called this the "typical sequel" and sadly, that's true. This was badly made.
5/10 is generous for this flick.
Sorry, but as this is a sequel, I have to compare to the first one. And boy oh boy, what an utter disappointment. So many shortcuts, so many empty and void characters. They could have made something good with Uma's arrival but no, just an empty movie. Oh, and the fight choreography is definitely not up to the first one. Also way less violent than the first. And the story in itself is not bad per se, but the way it is shown is just plain déjà-vu. Also, the way some characters interact with each other feels fake, too many inconsistencies.
My advice, go watch the first one and stay at that, you'll spent better your time.
My advice, go watch the first one and stay at that, you'll spent better your time.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilming was temporarily disrupted due to a fire at Cinecittà Studios, the fire destroyed a historic Florence set and "threatened the Big Brother house." It was quickly put out.
- ErroresThe men in the group are captured after they are frozen with liquid N2. Even with gallons of liquid N2 being poured onto them, they would not freeze solid as shown. Objects only freeze solid when submerged for several seconds to minutes. Since they are warm, they would need several minutes submerged in liquid N2 to freeze solid. By just pouring the liquid N2 over them, they would get surface burns, but would still be able to step away from the N2, alive and well.
- ConexionesFollows La vieja guardia (2020)
- Bandas sonorasMake It Look Easy
Written by Gin Wigmore and Tim Myers
Performed by Gin Wigmore
Courtesy of Concord Music Publishing
Courtesy of Roundhill Music and Palladium Records
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Old Guard 2?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The Old Guard 2
- Locaciones de filmación
- Riva Di Solto, Bergamo, Italia(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta