Dos nuevos críticos de cine, así como el reputado crítico Roger Ebert, reseñan películas recién estrenadas.Dos nuevos críticos de cine, así como el reputado crítico Roger Ebert, reseñan películas recién estrenadas.Dos nuevos críticos de cine, así como el reputado crítico Roger Ebert, reseñan películas recién estrenadas.
Explorar episodios
Fotos
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIgnatiy Vishnevetsky is 16 inches taller than his co-host, Christy Lemire. Lemire's seat is raised slightly higher than Vishnevetsky's to allow the two to be at eye level during the show.
- ConexionesFollows Siskel & Ebert & the Movies (1986)
Opinión destacada
Ebert Presents at the Movies fails to live up to the Siskel and Ebert pedigree that is its main selling point. In a number of areas, ranging from the charisma of its hosts to Roger Ebert's level of involvement. Even the theme music falls flat.
The first and most damaging problems is the new hosts' lack of charisma. Neither brings much edge or appeal to their critiques, an issue exacerbated by the fact that they tend to agree. A LOT. What made the original Siskel and Ebert such a great show was that the two critics held at times very different views, and clashed to a certain degree. The new critics lack the frisson that made them great.
Furthermore, the segments involving Roger Ebert are rather weak. Often, they just feature him reiterating the column he wrote about the reviewed movie. Even making allowances for his disability, this seems a rather weak approach. A better tactic would be for him to react to the review of the two hosts. (At times, they seem to dislike movies that Ebert has given great reviews.)
Even the theme music falls flat. The original series had an energetic saxophone theme, whereas this just uses the theme from The Third Man.
The first and most damaging problems is the new hosts' lack of charisma. Neither brings much edge or appeal to their critiques, an issue exacerbated by the fact that they tend to agree. A LOT. What made the original Siskel and Ebert such a great show was that the two critics held at times very different views, and clashed to a certain degree. The new critics lack the frisson that made them great.
Furthermore, the segments involving Roger Ebert are rather weak. Often, they just feature him reiterating the column he wrote about the reviewed movie. Even making allowances for his disability, this seems a rather weak approach. A better tactic would be for him to react to the review of the two hosts. (At times, they seem to dislike movies that Ebert has given great reviews.)
Even the theme music falls flat. The original series had an energetic saxophone theme, whereas this just uses the theme from The Third Man.
- TheExpatriate700
- 14 abr 2011
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución27 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Ebert Presents: At the Movies (2010) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda