It is unclear how the plot can be end-to-end if the artistic lines are not connected, and it is unclear how this can be called an almanac if the episodes are within the same story - this was a small digression, and now about the film.
Indeed, the beginning is interesting, intriguing, shrouded in mysticism and religious meanings, and I really liked this beginning, probably all fans of mystical stories will agree with me. The first episode is not only intriguing, but also surprising with unexpected twists. In general, my impressions of the first episode are only positive, the only thing that was a little lacking was big emotional plans in moments of denial. The first episode ends with a mysterious cliffhanger of the world of the dead and the director continues the narrative with additional illogical storylines. These two additional stories contain elements of absurd arthouse, in which what is happening, to a greater and then to a lesser extent, resembles the somnambulized fantasy of childhood traumas. The second episode is aimed at a teenage audience who is struggling to entertain the quirks of a crazy girl and her dissociative disorder. There is an ugly image in this episode, which the director associates with destruction and the concept of "thanatos". But there is a provocative and disgusting reason - the bathroom scene - that highlights the director's sexual deviations.
The third episode no longer entertains, but strains with absurd action, suicidal themes and problems of adolescent cruelty - involvement in these problems deserves special praise, but how the director mixes and presents these meanings is no longer so unambiguous and not so clear, it's all about the motives of the mother. The mother's character is depersonalized and disoriented, the reasons for this behavior are not explained and are not connected with the main theme of afterlife justice. The only connection of the third episode is the magical transformation of the door into a wall. This plot solution hints at the unreality of what is happening, but I don't see any point in it except for the usual manipulation or, if you like, mystical speculation for the sake of a magical flair. Doors in this film are generally a specific fetish of the director, I do not remember a film with so many doors. Through the doors, the director submits the plot of all the episodes, they flash in almost every scene, but do not create a clear picture and are not connected with the finale, and the finale is an important part not only of the film, but also of any dramatic work.
What the viewer eventually gets: the first unfinished fascinating episode, and two subsequent, completely unrelated plots, which are more like separate short films - and it takes a significant effort of will to watch them. The finale, well, is quite okay, if you save the first episode and the ending, and cut the other two, then nothing will change except for a shortened timekeeping, which does not go beyond the short film. In fact, the film consists of three short films, in which there are meaningless characters: a postman and a neighbor, and do not forget two dozen doors, which also embody inanimate characters.
In cinema, everything should be meaningful and necessary, but this collection has its own unique atmosphere, unknown to the viewer, but so close to the director-screenwriter.
Two things are very successful in the film: the initial intrigue of the first episode, and the voicing of socially acute themes of the third episode with a dramatic and terrible scene of teenage cruelty.
