Cacería En Venecia

Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) has retired and is living in Venice where he is visited by his old friend Ariadne Oliver (Tina Fey) who asks him to come to a seance held in a palatial Venetian house by top medium played by Michelle Yeoh who is seeking to speak with the spirit of a girl who apparently killed herself jumping from the building. Oliver wants Poirot to expose Yeoh as a fraud or start believing in the afterlife. He attends and there is a murder.

Branagh's third go at a Poirot story and depending on your fondness for these things, potentially the best. It is very different from the previous 2 mysteries in that whilst the usual interviews and ripping up of alibis takes place, there is a very distinct supernatural element here, which may or may not be real. What Branagh does though is use this to create a much darker and decidedly well crafted spooky story (he should definitely make a straight ghost story) which is looking both for a murderer and proof that the ghostly bit is true or false. So whilst the gloss and usual extravagant beautifully dressed characters might be missing there is still a great mystery to enjoy. I hope he does another one.

A Haunting in Venice is the third installment of Kenneth Branagh's adaptation of Agatha Christie's novels, featuring the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot. Set in post-World War II Venice, the film follows Poirot as he investigates a murder at a seance in a haunted palazzo, where he faces a surprise from his own past.

The film boasts an impressive cast, including Branagh himself as Poirot, Michelle Yeoh as the medium Joyce Reynolds, Jamie Dornan as the doctor Leslie Ferrier, Tina Fey as the mystery writer Ariadne Oliver, and Kelly Reilly as the opera singer Rowena Drake. However, none of the characters are likable or charming, and that makes it a bit challenging as the story requires a lot of patience. The film attempts to be eerie, but the camera work and the actors do not seem to be believable or convincing, despite its atmospheric setting and stellar location views of Venice.

The plot is loosely based on Christie's novel Hallowe'en Party, but with several changes and additions that make it more complex and modern. The film explores themes such as guilt, revenge, faith, and justice, and touches on the historical and social context of post-war Italy. The twist is detailed but not too convoluted, however, not very believable. The film also relies too much on CGI effects and jump scares, which undermine the suspense and mystery.

A Haunting in Venice is not a bad film, but it is not a great one either. It is a decent adaptation of Christie's work, but it lacks the charm and wit of the original. It is a film that tries to do too much, but fails to deliver on its promises. I liked it, but not very much. I gave it just a 6/10 rating.

This is my first foray into these Branagh Poirots having grown up with David Suchet on TV as him, so he had some big little Belgian shoes to fill.

Branagh brings enough intrigue and quirkiness to the character to make him his own, but in this film he is massively lost in the shadows of Tina Fey whose very presence steals any scene.

Whilst I didn't know the story/plot, it kept me guessing throughout, but some poorly executed shots and weak CGI moments gave the film an element of cheap horror film, and this jarred with the characters.

Yeoh's character was all too brief in her screen time, but she gave a great performance all the same. The main child actor - Jude Hill gives us a wonderfully intense, matter-of-fact, and sinisterly creepy Leopold. I hope to spot Jude flexing this skill in more films in future.

Wouldn't watch again, and likely wouldn't have gone to see it in the cinema if it wasn't because of friends wanting to watch it.

Whereas the last two Branagh Agatha Christie adaptations were movies I sort of liked at first and started to realise were "meh" over time, this latest entry is one that I recognised as mediocre upon first viewing.

Granted, it was really refreshing to see that this time, the filmmakers clearly put effort into the locations and production design. The film looks authentic and gorgeous, as opposed to its predecessors that were over reliant on unnecessary CGI backgrounds.

The story does have some interesting ideas and compelling character interactions, but they unfortunately take a back seat half the time. For the other half, we get a lot of weak attempts at horror and red herring plot points that really do amount to nothing.

I don't know what happened with the performances, but half of them are pretty great and the others are...well, awful. The actors clearly didn't agree on what kind of movie they were in, with some thinking it ought to be straight drama and others thinking they should play it corny.

Like the previous films, this is a middling whodunnit, with all the rote machinations you expect from the genre, nothing shocking, nothing gripping, but nothing so bad as to tank the experience.

It's the definition of mediocre.

This is an interesting film if you're not an Agatha Christie & Hercule Poirot fan. But for me it completely lacked the unique charm of Poirot, his methods and his personality. KB is a great actor but in this film he is as far from being Poirot as can be. Maybe that was intentional but for me it just didn't work. Tina Fey was a nice surprise although my image of Ariadne Oliver was quite different. The pace of the action is not at all balanced and is difficult to follow. It is not bad film, I would definitely recommend it instead of hundreds others but it doesn't do justice to Agatha Christie's marvellous writing.