CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.7/10
6.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaThe journey of a man from the slums of Mumbai to the world of underground extreme sports.The journey of a man from the slums of Mumbai to the world of underground extreme sports.The journey of a man from the slums of Mumbai to the world of underground extreme sports.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Opiniones destacadas
Review: Crackk (2024)
Crackk offers a rollercoaster of action-packed sequences, showcasing innovative concepts rarely seen in Bollywood. The camera work deserves applause for capturing the adrenaline-fueled moments with perfection. Among the four action sequences, the long-awaited showdown between Arjun and Vidyut in the climax stands out, delivering a thrilling experience.
However, the film isn't without its flaws. Vidyut's accent, haircut, and dressing style may be distracting, accompanied by subpar acting. Despite being a favorite, Amy Jackson's role falls flat, while Arjun Rampal shines with his usual brilliance in both acting prowess and looks. Bijoy Anand delivers commendable performance, but the repetitive ghostly appearances of Ankit Mohan become tiresome. Nora Fatehi's portrayal is average at best.
The first half of the film could have been tighter, enhancing the overall pacing and engagement. Nevertheless, Crackk remains a worthwhile watch primarily due to its high-octane action sequences. If you're a fan of adrenaline-pumping thrills, this movie won't disappoint.
Crackk offers a rollercoaster of action-packed sequences, showcasing innovative concepts rarely seen in Bollywood. The camera work deserves applause for capturing the adrenaline-fueled moments with perfection. Among the four action sequences, the long-awaited showdown between Arjun and Vidyut in the climax stands out, delivering a thrilling experience.
However, the film isn't without its flaws. Vidyut's accent, haircut, and dressing style may be distracting, accompanied by subpar acting. Despite being a favorite, Amy Jackson's role falls flat, while Arjun Rampal shines with his usual brilliance in both acting prowess and looks. Bijoy Anand delivers commendable performance, but the repetitive ghostly appearances of Ankit Mohan become tiresome. Nora Fatehi's portrayal is average at best.
The first half of the film could have been tighter, enhancing the overall pacing and engagement. Nevertheless, Crackk remains a worthwhile watch primarily due to its high-octane action sequences. If you're a fan of adrenaline-pumping thrills, this movie won't disappoint.
Recently watched the movie, and I have to say it left me with worst feelings. The acting was below the line, nothing extraordinary but not terrible either. I'd rate it around a 1 out of 10.
Now,the music and sound effects good. They were ordinary,there were unnecessary typical Bollywood songs. 3 out of 10 there.
As for the action, it was decent, but it didn't blow me away. I'd say it's about a 3 out of 10. The story was weak, definitely different from what I expected,even movie Luck(2009) was better for story point of view. However, there were moments where it felt a bit cluttered with unnecessary subplots. I'd give the story a 3 out of 10.
On the visual side, the cinematography was fake amd tiddy. The scenes were shot good but fake graphics were included. The movie felt sped up a bit, I'd rate it around an 4 out of 10.
Overall, I'd say the movie was not so good. It had lows aling with some highs , but it's not worth to watch if you're into something a bit different than your usual bollywood movies.
Now,the music and sound effects good. They were ordinary,there were unnecessary typical Bollywood songs. 3 out of 10 there.
As for the action, it was decent, but it didn't blow me away. I'd say it's about a 3 out of 10. The story was weak, definitely different from what I expected,even movie Luck(2009) was better for story point of view. However, there were moments where it felt a bit cluttered with unnecessary subplots. I'd give the story a 3 out of 10.
On the visual side, the cinematography was fake amd tiddy. The scenes were shot good but fake graphics were included. The movie felt sped up a bit, I'd rate it around an 4 out of 10.
Overall, I'd say the movie was not so good. It had lows aling with some highs , but it's not worth to watch if you're into something a bit different than your usual bollywood movies.
"To make a great film, you need three things - the script, the script, and the script," emphasized Alfred Hitchcock.
Unfortunately, the narrative of this particular movie fails to captivate. The characters are thinly sketched, lacking the depth necessary to truly resonate with the audience. Even the protagonist's motivations seem to lack authenticity, leaving viewers disconnected from the story.
To ensnare the audience's attention, Makers resorted to a bombardment of action, seemingly unaware of its incongruity with the tale at hand, employing it as a desperate lifeline to sustain intrigue.
In conclusion, Vidyut's open challenge to Tiger, who epitomizes the trend towards mindless action movies.
Unfortunately, the narrative of this particular movie fails to captivate. The characters are thinly sketched, lacking the depth necessary to truly resonate with the audience. Even the protagonist's motivations seem to lack authenticity, leaving viewers disconnected from the story.
To ensnare the audience's attention, Makers resorted to a bombardment of action, seemingly unaware of its incongruity with the tale at hand, employing it as a desperate lifeline to sustain intrigue.
In conclusion, Vidyut's open challenge to Tiger, who epitomizes the trend towards mindless action movies.
Don't waste your time guys.
No story line at all. Every thing is so random. Individual scenes put together without thinking about it. The amount of low quality CGI used is laughable.
Voiceover is also horrible.. just avoid it and save some time.
Vidyut is such a let down. Has no acting skills. We that explains why he does these kind of films. Nora fatehi, plz stay out of acting or atleast learn acting.
Feel sorry for Arjun as he might have felt after seeing this movie. Why in the world did he agree to this absolutely cra* of a movie.
Watch this movie of you would like to laugh at utter nonsense.
No story line at all. Every thing is so random. Individual scenes put together without thinking about it. The amount of low quality CGI used is laughable.
Voiceover is also horrible.. just avoid it and save some time.
Vidyut is such a let down. Has no acting skills. We that explains why he does these kind of films. Nora fatehi, plz stay out of acting or atleast learn acting.
Feel sorry for Arjun as he might have felt after seeing this movie. Why in the world did he agree to this absolutely cra* of a movie.
Watch this movie of you would like to laugh at utter nonsense.
We could have done without the Gully boy act, which made Vidhyut's character look fake and sound phony. Vidhyut needs to pick scripts which does not require much acting, as that is his Achilles heel. He excels in the action & stunt dept and should stick to that. Amy Jackson and Nora Fatehi were just eye candies, picked solely for the glamour and attitude aspect. Arjun Rampal acting skill has always been mediocre and amply displayed it in this movie. He too was picked solely for looks. The Death Race scenario has been done to death in Hollywood, and in the Bollywood movie "Luck". For stunt junkies this movie would be perfect, for the more mature and discerning viewers not so much.
¿Sabías que…?
- Versiones alternativasFollowing the film's commercial disappointment, the makers changed the climax by removing 15 minutes of footage for the digital release.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Crakk: Jeetega... Toh Jiyegaa?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Crakk - Jeethegaa Toh Jiyegaa!
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 164,304
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 2h 34min(154 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta