"La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre"
Ronald Reagan
- Self - U.S. President
- (material de archivo)
Michio Kaku
- Self - Professor of Theoretical Physics
- (material de archivo)
Carol Rosin
- Self - speaker, author, educator
- (material de archivo)
Ellison Onizuka
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Joseph Spencer
- Self - CIA Whistleblower, Man in black - [1989 archive]
- (material de archivo)
Judith A. Resnik
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Cady Coleman
- Self - American NASA astronaut
- (material de archivo)
- (as Catherine Grace Coleman)
Michael J. Smith
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Opiniones destacadas
"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
While I'm not sure about the conclusion, this movie is really well done, for such a low budget film. I think anyone who honestly, approaches the work, with an open mind, will at least be intrigued, and come away questioning everything they thought they new.
The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.
The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.
I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.
Great job!
The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.
The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.
I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.
Great job!
Remember, these "brilliant" flat earthers want you to believe the Challenger astronauts who died just got moved but didn't change their names. Seriously?
Utter garbage from con artists. Not even anything different from before. They just regurgitate the same nonsense from video to video and expect their tinfoil hat followers to stand in awe of their brilliance.
Go watch SciManDan's recap of these on YouTube for a better understanding of how terrible it really is.
Get back to us when you flat earthers find a working map of Flatopia... one with a scale so it's useful. Until then we all know the saying... Gotta lie to flerf.
Utter garbage from con artists. Not even anything different from before. They just regurgitate the same nonsense from video to video and expect their tinfoil hat followers to stand in awe of their brilliance.
Go watch SciManDan's recap of these on YouTube for a better understanding of how terrible it really is.
Get back to us when you flat earthers find a working map of Flatopia... one with a scale so it's useful. Until then we all know the saying... Gotta lie to flerf.
Level With Me - goes into how nasa is scamming billions of tax dollars then lies pushing their outer space agenda for an fake alien invasion which I understood years ago is possible. Level With Me is amazing putting together the nasa lies & how they fake everything they do at the same time msm uses fear mongering to set up the fake alien invasion more & more everyday. Sorry to the powers at be, too many people understand the nonsense from cv19 & more than ever don't trust anything the msm pushes. I also recommend watching "The Next Level" and "Level" the prior sequels explaining Flat Earth & how we believe the nonsense globe model just because it's taught at school from generation to generation only recently.
While this one is an improvement for not having a droning narrator spout baseless assertions for an hour, it's only a slight improvement in that it has a variety of speakers choppily cut together spouting baseless assertions and accusations for an hour. It closes with another appeal to conspiracy and some weak fear-mongering.
As a factual "documentary" it fails on every front, and is more reminescent of 1980's public-access infomercials from various cults (look up the Heaven's Gate VHS tapes for an example).
You could argue that this entire series is a successful record of the wide-ranging baseless conspiracy theories of the early-21st century's flat earth cult. It is fascinating how these ideas find something to resonate with in the vast echo-chambers of social media and the way the resulting mishmash of vague untested ideas, factually incorrect memes, and conspiracy theories tie together for the "true believers" (who are, ironically, urging other people to questions the liars). In that sense, this film and the others in the series might be worthwhile for current and future social scientists who are researching the way online cults form.
For everyone else, this is a bad-faith attempt at a "documentary" that's nearly unwatchable. Believe the bad reviews, save your time, and watch anything else.
As a factual "documentary" it fails on every front, and is more reminescent of 1980's public-access infomercials from various cults (look up the Heaven's Gate VHS tapes for an example).
You could argue that this entire series is a successful record of the wide-ranging baseless conspiracy theories of the early-21st century's flat earth cult. It is fascinating how these ideas find something to resonate with in the vast echo-chambers of social media and the way the resulting mishmash of vague untested ideas, factually incorrect memes, and conspiracy theories tie together for the "true believers" (who are, ironically, urging other people to questions the liars). In that sense, this film and the others in the series might be worthwhile for current and future social scientists who are researching the way online cults form.
For everyone else, this is a bad-faith attempt at a "documentary" that's nearly unwatchable. Believe the bad reviews, save your time, and watch anything else.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Level with Me?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 45,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 7min(67 min)
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta