A Space Adventure Hour
- El episodio se transmitió el 31 jul 2025
- TV-PG
- 48min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.5/10
2.9 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaWhen La'An tests a prototype holodeck with a fictional case only she can solve, the consequences of failure get greater and greater, with the Enterprise hanging in the balance.When La'An tests a prototype holodeck with a fictional case only she can solve, the consequences of failure get greater and greater, with the Enterprise hanging in the balance.When La'An tests a prototype holodeck with a fictional case only she can solve, the consequences of failure get greater and greater, with the Enterprise hanging in the balance.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Opiniones destacadas
There seems to be a trend these days to bash films and TV because it's not EXACTLY what the person wanted. It's not McDonalds where you get the same thing every time when you order a burger, this is a living, breathing thing that doesn't always match what people demand. I guess I've mellowed in my old age because my only expectation is to be entertained, and I'll be honest, this is what SNW does. From the very opening I was chuckling and we see a VERY on the nose reason why SNWs Jim Kirk isn't a carbon copy of TOS - Paul Wesley does a fantastic job of being "Shatner" in the episodes opening. The episode finishes with outtakes and he botches the Riker Manoeuvre badly, which really made me laugh as Jonathan Frakes directed the episode. The actors get to have fun playing characters that are not their usual roles, with Anson Mount and Jess Bush really standing out. I enjoyed this episode and the further development of Scotty coupled with the reason why holodecks aren't installed on the TOS Enterprise. My advice - kick back, relax and just enjoy the show ^-_-^
The heady playfulness of parodying TOS with a mystery essentially investigating the cancellation of TOS is brilliant. The hazy period references, the riff on the old theremin theme with a jazzy lounge singer, the Shatner/Roddenberry analogs and '60s costumes are so funny and character names are hilarious. Using this show as a vehicle to play with TOS mythology through Pike and co is a great concept.
This is a hit-or-miss "meta" episode that also explains why Kirk's Enterprise didn't have a holodeck, which is kind of a neat thing to work into canon.
The sets and costumes for the goofy show-within-a-show are fun but Paul Wesley's Shatner impression - if that's what he was doing - fell short. And it's not that hard to mimic.
On the other hand, Anson Mount is always the star of these goofy episodes, because they give him a chance to show his considerable acting chops. He did the best job with his obsequious character from fantasy medieval episode. And this time he appears to be playing a Gene Roddenberry character? Not sure if it's accurate - are people familiar with Roddenberry's mannerisms - but it's fun and it works.
To top it all off, there's a holodeck mystery whose solution is reasonably clever. Not a bad example of SNW's goofball episodes. Works better than previous ones.
The sets and costumes for the goofy show-within-a-show are fun but Paul Wesley's Shatner impression - if that's what he was doing - fell short. And it's not that hard to mimic.
On the other hand, Anson Mount is always the star of these goofy episodes, because they give him a chance to show his considerable acting chops. He did the best job with his obsequious character from fantasy medieval episode. And this time he appears to be playing a Gene Roddenberry character? Not sure if it's accurate - are people familiar with Roddenberry's mannerisms - but it's fun and it works.
To top it all off, there's a holodeck mystery whose solution is reasonably clever. Not a bad example of SNW's goofball episodes. Works better than previous ones.
I don't care too much about canon or tradition that must be adhered to but I do care about entertaining sci-fi. This episode and the rest of this season seem to be written and directed by committee. The actors themselves are doing a good job and showing different aspects of their personality but the sci fi part is lacking. Decent drama almost sitcom like, something you can watch at 7pm on a Tuesday night back in the day but does not satisfy the adventure itch.
This is definitely one of my favourite episodes! Not sure what kill joy here isn't enjoying something fun and light-hearted. The acting is brilliant, the characters are engaging and this episode was just hilarious. Even while creating a throw back type episode they still manage to move the storyline forward with an exciting ending! Strange New worlds has been the only Star Trek since TNG I genuinely look forward to watching. They don't try to add excessive amounts of misery and darkness trying to appear unique or edgy. I always finish the episodes looking forward to the next. Please please don't cancel this show ahead of time. Far too many Sci-fi shows get cancelled. SNW is up there with TNG in my books.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresThe opening post-credits scene shows the Enterprise in front of the neutron star it is studying. The lines of the star's magnetic fields are clearly visible, however they should not be. Since this is an "outside" view of the star and the Enterprise, and not a sensor image seen on a screen, those lines would not be present as they cannot be seen by the naked eye. Just as the magnetic fields of the Earth and the Sun are not visible to the naked eye. A neutron star does have a vastly more powerful magnetic field, anywhere between a billion to a quadrillion times that of the Sun's, as such it is theorized the field lines might be visible to the naked eye when interacting with charged particles like from gases in a nebula, but this star is not in a nebula.
- ConexionesReferenced in Jon Del Arroz: Strange New Worlds Had The WORST Episode Of Star Trek EVER! (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 48min
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta