Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds
T3.E1
Todos los episodiosTodo
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Hegemony, Part II

  • El episodio se transmitió el 16 jul 2025
  • TV-PG
  • 48min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.8/10
2.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Anson Mount in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds (2022)
AcciónAventuraCiencia Ficción

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaPike risks it all, taking the Enterprise on a daring rescue mission behind enemy lines, while the landing party attempts an escape from a deadly enemy.Pike risks it all, taking the Enterprise on a daring rescue mission behind enemy lines, while the landing party attempts an escape from a deadly enemy.Pike risks it all, taking the Enterprise on a daring rescue mission behind enemy lines, while the landing party attempts an escape from a deadly enemy.

  • Dirección
    • Chris Fisher
  • Guionistas
    • Gene Roddenberry
    • Akiva Goldsman
    • Alex Kurtzman
  • Elenco
    • Anson Mount
    • Ethan Peck
    • Jess Bush
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.8/10
    2.6 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Chris Fisher
    • Guionistas
      • Gene Roddenberry
      • Akiva Goldsman
      • Alex Kurtzman
    • Elenco
      • Anson Mount
      • Ethan Peck
      • Jess Bush
    • 27Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 7Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Fotos2

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal19

    Editar
    Anson Mount
    Anson Mount
    • Captain Christopher Pike
    Ethan Peck
    Ethan Peck
    • Spock
    Jess Bush
    Jess Bush
    • Nurse Christine Chapel
    Christina Chong
    Christina Chong
    • La'an Noonien-Singh
    Celia Rose Gooding
    Celia Rose Gooding
    • Nyota Uhura
    Melissa Navia
    Melissa Navia
    • Lt. Erica Ortegas
    Babs Olusanmokun
    Babs Olusanmokun
    • Dr. M'Benga
    Martin Quinn
    Martin Quinn
    • Lieutenant Montgomery Scott
    Rebecca Romijn
    Rebecca Romijn
    • Una Chin-Riley
    Adrian Holmes
    Adrian Holmes
    • Admiral Robert April
    Melanie Scrofano
    Melanie Scrofano
    • Captain Batel
    Dan Jeannotte
    Dan Jeannotte
    • Lieutenant George Samuel 'Sam' Kirk
    Carol Kane
    Carol Kane
    • Pelia
    Rong Fu
    Rong Fu
    • Jenna Mitchell
    Matia Jackett
    Matia Jackett
    • Nurse Bo
    Alex Kapp
    Alex Kapp
    • USS Enterprise Computer
    • (voz)
    Ava Cheung
    Ava Cheung
    • Young La'an
    • (material de archivo)
    • (sin créditos)
    Cameron Roberts
    Cameron Roberts
    • Manu
    • (material de archivo)
    • (sin créditos)
    • Dirección
      • Chris Fisher
    • Guionistas
      • Gene Roddenberry
      • Akiva Goldsman
      • Alex Kurtzman
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios27

    7.82.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    8machrf

    They should have asked Harper...

    How to get rid of the magog eggs. Oh wait, these are not the Magog. I don't know if I mind the crossover or not. I do think they could have come up with something better. I also think they could have done far better with Andromeda than they did and they could have continued with other series and moives. But we get to enjoy Star Trek even if they shift quality and dedication to what Star Trek is in each series. I have grown to like this series more and more even with its mistakes. And they did make this work without a tesseracting machine which is a plus. I would have to rate this series up there either as the second or third best. How they are doing such a better job over the Crying Burnham show is beyond me. How can there be two recent series that are polar opposites in the same universe?
    8Macfeetie

    Great episode.

    Very entertaining. Filled with action and high stakes drama. Plus, a cool new take on classic original series characters.

    It was an excellent follow up to a very compelling cliffhanger from the previous season. For me personally, the best episodes are ones that go all out with dynamic space battles and power struggles with other beings.

    Good job.
    5alex-322029310

    Cheap Cliffhanger Resolution

    After all the tension buildup in the last episode, unfortunately this has been slightly on the disappointing end.

    As someone else posted here, there were too many parallel problems cramped into a single episode, leading to a rushed resolution that sounded like lazy pretense even for a Sci-Fi world like Star Trek.

    And just as an example: beaming people from an alien ship using alien transporter codes? What was that? And just using transporter codes, how did they avoid beaming the already digested folk?

    Of course there were some references to other Star Trek tropes, like shield modulation frequency etc., but not executed elegantly.

    It's a weak start for the season, but let's see what comes next.
    8nerrdrage

    Starfleet is competent, and lucky

    There's a persistent criticism in fandom about Star Trek series that depict Starfleet as too emotional, not following orders, just not very military in this quasi-military organization and I agree with that to some extent.

    That certainly isn't the problem in this episode, where Our Heroes must mount a rescue mission, deal with a medical crisis, and fend off possible invasion, while thinking on their feet at a quick pace.

    I loved the opening sequence where Pike is taking suggestions on creative ideas for dealing with the crisis at hand, batting away some and finally glomming onto the likely option. The other crises are also handled via quick, intelligent, creative thinking, which is only possible if the writers are creative and intelligent too.

    Sure, the solutions are fake technology but they have plausibility, not just "re-route the frazzleblaster up the yin-yang" technobabble that Star Trek is infamous for.

    However the need to wrap this all up in an hour (or 40 minutes to leave room for ads) means that the overall solution to the Gorn problem comes a bit out of left field and seems pretty convenient.

    And the fast pace means that some "resolution" scenes that show people being rescued, patients being revived, etc must be dropped. The minute the characters devise the solution, the assumption is, the solution is implemented without the emotional catharsis of actually seeing it happen.

    But overall this is what I want to see from Star Trek. This series is just so much more smartly written than other recent series on Paramount+.
    lor_

    Executive decisions

    This extremely tense, well-paced episode concerning the war with the Gorn revolves around Pike's ability to make so many split-second executive decisions that determine the fate not only of the Enterprise and its crew but the entire Federation.

    I'm surprised at the torrent of criticism in reviews posted here which critically miss the point. Somehow Hitchcock is considered a genius of film suspense, but his movies depend on many instances of what he termed the MacGuffin -basically a black box plot device used to propel the story without revealing exactly how key elements work.

    Here, in Davy Perez's screenplay, we have dozens of scientific ideas or concepts submitted by Pike's crew (or Spock to Nurse Chapel in sick bay to save their ailing collelague) for him to act upon. Any one of which are crucial to survival and victory, but for which the details are irrelevant -the viewer cannot be expected to understand the scientific basis for all this.

    So taken as entertainment, this is just what the doctor ordered - an action-packed, at times frightening sci-fi adventure. The relationships between the crew members are easy to identify with, and contributions to the success of the mission are well-distributed among them.

    Intereses relacionados

    Bruce Willis in Duro de matar (1988)
    Acción
    Still frame
    Aventura
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in El imperio contraataca (1980)
    Ciencia Ficción

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      One of the treatment methods Spock suggests for Captain Batel is microscopic debulking, which is a real life surgical procedure used in treating cancer and other malignant growths, the Mohs surgery being an example. First chemotherapy and radiation are used to shrink the tumor as small as possible. Then a surgeon removes the remaining macroscopically visible tumorous tissue, then focuses on removing any remaining microscopic cancer cells that could cause the tumor to regrow. This process involves removing thin layers of tissue under where the visible tumor was removed, examining them under a microscope, and repeating the process until all cancerous cells are removed. This greatly decreases the chances of recurrence, and is especially useful in treating aggressive types of cancer that reoccur like basal cell carcinomas or squamous cell carcinomas.
    • Errores
      At the beginning of S3:E1 Pike asks Uhura to repeat April's orders that were originally given in the final moments of S2:E10. Uhura reiterates the orders: "rendezvous with the fleet", Pike says "... but he didn't say 'immediately'" and uses this as a loophole to proceeds with his own plans - but in S2:E10 when Uhura conveys April's orders they do in fact include "immediately".
    • Conexiones
      Referenced in TrekCulture: WTH Just Happened? Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 3.1 - Hegemony Pt 2 (Full Spoiler Discussion) (2025)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 16 de julio de 2025 (México)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 48min
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Dolby Atmos
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.