Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Guía de episodios
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
IMDbPro

The Jury: Murder Trial

  • Miniserie de TV
  • 2024–
  • 3h
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.0/10
299
TU CALIFICACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
476
4,501
The Jury: Murder Trial (2024)
Reality TV

¿Hasta qué punto podemos confiar en nuestro sistema judicial? Este experimento sin precedentes sigue un juicio por asesinato en la vida real ante dos jurados. ¿Llegarán al mismo veredicto? P... Leer todo¿Hasta qué punto podemos confiar en nuestro sistema judicial? Este experimento sin precedentes sigue un juicio por asesinato en la vida real ante dos jurados. ¿Llegarán al mismo veredicto? Proyectado durante 4 días consecutivos.¿Hasta qué punto podemos confiar en nuestro sistema judicial? Este experimento sin precedentes sigue un juicio por asesinato en la vida real ante dos jurados. ¿Llegarán al mismo veredicto? Proyectado durante 4 días consecutivos.

  • Creación
    • Harry Smyth
    • Will Stanbridge
    • Ed Kellie
  • Elenco
    • Sam Alexander
    • Georgia Hughes
    • Andrew Piper
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.0/10
    299
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    476
    4,501
    • Creación
      • Harry Smyth
      • Will Stanbridge
      • Ed Kellie
    • Elenco
      • Sam Alexander
      • Georgia Hughes
      • Andrew Piper
    • 8Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 3Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Ganó 1 premio BAFTA
      • 3 premios ganados en total

    Episodios8

    Explorar episodios
    DestacadoLos mejor calificados

    Fotos9

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 5
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal88

    Editar
    Sam Alexander
    Sam Alexander
    • John Reisdale
    • 2024
    Georgia Hughes
    Georgia Hughes
    • Sophie Fairlow
    • 2025
    Andrew Piper
    • Prosecution Barrister (Ryan Thomas)
    • 2024
    Richard Huw
    • Judge Justice Kingswood
    • 2025
    Christopher Simpson
    Christopher Simpson
    • Xavier Ahmad QC
    • 2024
    Alexandra Gilbreath
    Alexandra Gilbreath
    • Diana Bakersfield
    • 2025
    James Allen
    James Allen
    • Judge Eberdale
    • 2024
    Charlotte Pyke
    Charlotte Pyke
    • Jennifer Ward
    • 2025
    Charles Humphreys
    Charles Humphreys
    • Ryan Hargrove
    • 2025
    Edward Wolstenholme
    Edward Wolstenholme
    • Mr. Michael Day
    • 2024
    Jenny Coates
    • 2024
    Cristina Pagani
    Cristina Pagani
    • Junior Defence Barrister
    • 2025
    Roxanne Vella
    • Junior Prosecuting Barrister
    • 2025
    Eliza Flores
    • 2024
    Sofia Price
    Sofia Price
    • Court Clerk
    • 2025
    Benjamin Van Parys
    • Clerk Assistant
    • 2025
    David Hubert
    • 2024
    Mair Terry
    • Security Guard
    • 2025
    • Creación
      • Harry Smyth
      • Will Stanbridge
      • Ed Kellie
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios8

    7.0299
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    6gilleliath

    tell us something we don't know

    Of course, C4 can never just show something trashy for entertainment, so this is therefore an 'experiment' supposedly showing how the dynamics of a jury work. Yet it is in two respects completely unrealistic. First, the juries were obviously not selected randomly but in accordance with 'BBC diversity'. Actually the white blokes included are middle-aged white van men, and the whole thing seems set up as a deliberate microcosm of the culture wars. And second, they may reproduce the words spoken in the real-life trial, but what they can't reproduce (of course) is the general impression made by the witnesses - and, as the jurors' comments make clear, *that is what they mainly go by*. Did the real defendant have such mother-me eyes? Did he burst into tears quite so much? We don't know. Yer man gives it his all, though, I must say that.

    Indeed it is clear that most people made up their minds pretty early on, and did this according to their existing prejudices. Two eps in, we haven't really seen any discussion, as such, at all; those who hold minority views are keeping quiet. Almost nothing that anybody has said - and least of all the barristers who are paid so much to present a case - has actually had any bearing on how it should be judged. Any fictional defence lawyer, Saul Goodman or Kim Wexler say, would rapidly have made mincemeat of the prosecution's feeble efforts. So if the show proves one thing, it is that people don't decide things on reason. But we already knew that...

    Curiously, and in contrast to TV whodunnits, there has been very little focus on the actual MO of the killing. Yet this seems of crucial importance. The guy, having already strangled the woman, and not sure if she is already dead, then finishes her off with a big club hammer that happens to be handy. Why reach for that at all, if the strangling was just 'loss of control'? And okay, he's a sort of blacksmith, but what is the hammer doing on the kitchen table? Nobody in the juries has spotted this anomaly. I suspect him of a pre-meditation that would invalidate the 'loss of control' defence - for whatever that was ever worth.

    ETA: no change in the last ep, in which the juries had to decide their verdicts: every single person went by their general impression of the guy and the case, as seen through the lens of their own previous experiences; not by the specific facts of the killing which were the only things relevant. Added to that, we saw those with minority views in both juries cave in fairly rapidly to the social pressure to agree with the others, in spite of having been apparently adamant in their original opinions. One or two of these seemed to feel they'd been cheated, when they realised there was another jury that had returned the contrary verdict and that therefore their own previous views were defensible. But they had no-one to blame but themselves and their lack of backbone.

    All in all it was pretty depressing, whether considered as illustrating how the jury system works or its wider implications about how beliefs form and spread in society. Interesting, but not exactly fun.
    5IzzyB-7

    The jury trial

    I really hope our uk jury system isn't like thia ,they don't go on facts but .feelings and personal experiences. They one minute think one way and on a word of another they change .I hate to think that's what our jury is like ..the people on Lucy trial in Liverpool half the jury are not intelligent enough to be deciding someone fate ..already there verdict should be thrown out becuaw there not going on by facts.
    3mikeingram-03413

    Could be better

    I appreciate that the intention of this program was to determine whether two independent juries could come up with two different results. However, surely the experiment needed more control procedures to try and reduce (elimination not being possible) the impact of factors that would not be present within the original trial.

    What I felt was that the experiment showed how two groups of differing people could come up with different results based upon interaction that would not be present within the court and trial system.

    The fact that the people chose to go on a TV program, rather than the non optional reality of being put on jury duty, also shows that ego and playing to the camera were very present factors. I appreciate that the real pressure of being on jury duty could not be replicated, but the process and procedures could have been better simulated.

    For me it was an interesting experiment but value degraded to make it a more watchable program.
    2catkittenwoman

    Suspicious

    This, to me, seems to be false. Why are they wearing the same clothes for a week or more? They must be uncomfortable at least.

    There is a lack of real diversity in both juries and . They seem to have made their minds up at the beginning.

    The juries forgot that the defendant is an actor and took what he said and displayed emotionally as fact without questioning it. (Yes I know it's dramatised) WHY is there a lump hammer in the kitchen? The jury failed to question this at all. Most artists keep their equipment where they work. Not in the kitchen All in , disappointing. Could do better next time-if there is a next time!
    1roxmewild

    Not realistic trial = worthless conclusion

    I watched this trial and am currently watching the latest offering based at the old courts in St George's hall Liverpool. Nothing has changed and my review is on this trial and the current. Firstly at beginning prior to start the narrator says will the jury come to the right decision this in itself is wrong If they meant would the jury come to the same decision as original trial then that narrative is acceptable.

    The jurors based a lot of decisions on how the witnesses and accused appeared and responded on the stand wich in a role play using actors can not be considered! Jurors do not discuss murder trials until ALL the evidence and witnesses etc has been presented and both defence and prosecution have given their closing arguments. The Jury only then deliberate. Verdict is reached by the weight of evidence not on personal experiences of the jurors not by assumption Only by facts presented .

    For all the above reasons is why this reality based show Fails and Any decisions made cannot be Compared to the Real case! To be honest I found it annoying for all these reasons. For clarity I have served on a Jury and have based my review on that knowledge.

    Más como esto

    Operation Dark Phone: Murder by Text
    8.0
    Operation Dark Phone: Murder by Text
    Unforgivable
    7.5
    Unforgivable
    Destination X
    6.1
    Destination X
    The Jury
    The Jury
    The Jury: Death on the Staircase
    7.6
    The Jury: Death on the Staircase
    24 Hours in Police Custody
    8.4
    24 Hours in Police Custody
    The Jury
    7.6
    The Jury
    The Fortune Hotel
    7.2
    The Fortune Hotel
    Breathtaking
    7.6
    Breathtaking
    In Flight
    6.3
    In Flight
    The British Airways Killer
    6.9
    The British Airways Killer
    Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax
    6.6
    Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax

    Intereses relacionados

    Kim Kardashian in The Kardashians (2022)
    Reality TV

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Errores
      In British courts, barristers do not typically wander around the court during proceedings in the same way as attorneys might do in American courtrooms. The layout and practices in courtrooms can vary between jurisdictions, but there are some general differences between the British and American legal systems.

      In the United Kingdom, barristers (advocates) usually address the court from a designated area, such as the bar table. They may move within this area but do not typically walk around the courtroom during the presentation of cases.

      In this presentation the barrister moved around the court room.

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 26 de febrero de 2024 (Reino Unido)
    • País de origen
      • Reino Unido
    • Sitio oficial
      • Screendog
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • East Sussex, Inglaterra(location)
    • Productora
      • ScreenDog Productions
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 3h(180 min)
    • Color
      • Color

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar páginaAgregar episodio

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.