I Was That, Too
- El episodio se transmitió el 10 abr 2025
- TV-14
- 43min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
8.6/10
541
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una mujer embarazada busca la ayuda de Olympia para divorciarse de su esposo, quien proviene de una familia que son clientes de la firma.Una mujer embarazada busca la ayuda de Olympia para divorciarse de su esposo, quien proviene de una familia que son clientes de la firma.Una mujer embarazada busca la ayuda de Olympia para divorciarse de su esposo, quien proviene de una familia que son clientes de la firma.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Fotos
Aaron Harris
- Alfie Kingston
- (as Aaron D. Harris)
Opiniones destacadas
What did I just watch? I agree with utterly stupid and ridiculously stupid. They've both said everything that needed saying about this poorly written and acted episode. One of the worst episodes of television I've ever suffered through. Who approved this? How is it rated so high? This episode rating is proof they are paying for good reviews. I was really enjoying this show, but I don't know if I continue after this, I'll just be thinking about this nonsense every time. Now I need to go apologize to every friend I've recommended watch this show.
Also, not sure why a review needs to contain so many characters.
Also, not sure why a review needs to contain so many characters.
Tension is sustained throughout this "Matlock" segment where the series' central story arc takes a major turn, via a confrontation between Olympia and Matlock.
Also adding to the dead-serious mood is the new case for Olympia, representing a pregnant woman (Eliza Bennett) in a potential custody battle for the impending child, against a controlling, abusive husband. The key wrinkle in the matter: he is represented by Olympia's firm, putting her into conflict with her boss.
Mattie is instrumental in working on this new case in a race against time, while also having to dramatically hold her own against Olympia on the warpath. It's a very well-written drama that adds dimensions to both leading characters, and right on cue delivers yet another terrific cliffhanger ending.
Also adding to the dead-serious mood is the new case for Olympia, representing a pregnant woman (Eliza Bennett) in a potential custody battle for the impending child, against a controlling, abusive husband. The key wrinkle in the matter: he is represented by Olympia's firm, putting her into conflict with her boss.
Mattie is instrumental in working on this new case in a race against time, while also having to dramatically hold her own against Olympia on the warpath. It's a very well-written drama that adds dimensions to both leading characters, and right on cue delivers yet another terrific cliffhanger ending.
Ep 17 leans into confrontation over courtroom drama, with Olympia and Matty forced into a raw exchange that peels back secrets and resentments. It's bold in concept, but not every moment lands. The intensity sometimes tips into overstatement, making parts of the conflict feel a touch forced rather than naturally earned.
The divorce case at the centre is sensitive and carries weight, yet a few turns feel shoehorned to fit the season's broader arc rather than arising organically. Still, it provides a platform for Skye P. Marshall, who delivers with conviction, and for Kathy Bates, who balances vulnerability with a steely calm.
While not as tightly balanced as earlier standouts, this episode does push the characters forward. Even with uneven notes, it keeps the tension simmering as we approach the final stretch of the season.
The divorce case at the centre is sensitive and carries weight, yet a few turns feel shoehorned to fit the season's broader arc rather than arising organically. Still, it provides a platform for Skye P. Marshall, who delivers with conviction, and for Kathy Bates, who balances vulnerability with a steely calm.
While not as tightly balanced as earlier standouts, this episode does push the characters forward. Even with uneven notes, it keeps the tension simmering as we approach the final stretch of the season.
This show has turned completely stupid. The writers couldn't leave well enough alone so everyone apparently has lost their mind.
No lawyer would act like Olympia acted in the beginning of this episode. The story had jumped so far out of its own universe that it's ridiculous. Poorly written, poorly executed, it's like it was written by A. I.
Really? Locking a person in an office? Stealing their phone?
The only good thing was the reference to "Misery".
There is nothing realistic about this episode. Nothing at all. The side case, the judge, none of it.
I have loved this series thus far. With this episode it has just gotten really stupid. I am so disappointed.
No lawyer would act like Olympia acted in the beginning of this episode. The story had jumped so far out of its own universe that it's ridiculous. Poorly written, poorly executed, it's like it was written by A. I.
Really? Locking a person in an office? Stealing their phone?
The only good thing was the reference to "Misery".
There is nothing realistic about this episode. Nothing at all. The side case, the judge, none of it.
I have loved this series thus far. With this episode it has just gotten really stupid. I am so disappointed.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMattie made mention of the Sacklers, which was the family which controlled the former company known as Purdue Pharma, the originators of the "Opium Crisis".
- ConexionesFeatured in The 77th Primetime Emmy Awards (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta