christian-63768
ene 2020 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas3
Clasificación de christian-63768
In Jurassic World: Rebirth, dinosaurs roar, people scream, and originality is declared extinct. Again.
This latest entry in the franchise doesn't so much evolve as it loops-gracefully, beautifully, and utterly pointlessly. Yes, the dinosaurs look great (they always do). The jungles are lush, the explosions are big, and the camera never misses a chance to swoop dramatically over a CGI creature doing something predictably terrifying. But behind the spectacle? A story so familiar it might've been cloned from a 2015 script... which itself was cloned from 1993.
The characters are mostly there to gawk, run, and make suspiciously bad decisions. There's the usual evil biotech guy, the plucky kid, the brooding scientist, and a new dino hybrid that's even "more dangerous" than the last one (yawn). Any deeper themes-ethics, hubris, survival-are quickly trampled underfoot by the franchise's relentless devotion to... well, itself.
It looks fantastic and says absolutely nothing. Rebirth is less a resurrection and more a very expensive cinematic rerun. Life may find a way-but this franchise clearly hasn't.
This latest entry in the franchise doesn't so much evolve as it loops-gracefully, beautifully, and utterly pointlessly. Yes, the dinosaurs look great (they always do). The jungles are lush, the explosions are big, and the camera never misses a chance to swoop dramatically over a CGI creature doing something predictably terrifying. But behind the spectacle? A story so familiar it might've been cloned from a 2015 script... which itself was cloned from 1993.
The characters are mostly there to gawk, run, and make suspiciously bad decisions. There's the usual evil biotech guy, the plucky kid, the brooding scientist, and a new dino hybrid that's even "more dangerous" than the last one (yawn). Any deeper themes-ethics, hubris, survival-are quickly trampled underfoot by the franchise's relentless devotion to... well, itself.
It looks fantastic and says absolutely nothing. Rebirth is less a resurrection and more a very expensive cinematic rerun. Life may find a way-but this franchise clearly hasn't.
Enya Baroux's On ira is a tender, darkly humorous road movie about death, secrets, and strained family ties. Hélène Vincent shines as Marie, a terminally ill grandmother secretly traveling to Switzerland for assisted suicide, dragging along her clueless son Bruno and rebellious granddaughter Anna under the false promise of an inheritance.
What unfolds is a bittersweet journey marked by awkward humor, buried resentments, and emotional thawing. Baroux resists melodrama, letting the characters speak through silence and discomfort. The film is grounded, visually unflashy, and all the more affecting for it.
With strong performances, especially from Vincent and David Ayala as the gentle caregiver Rudy, On ira explores mortality with grace and wit. Quiet, offbeat, and deeply human-it lingers long after the credits roll.
What unfolds is a bittersweet journey marked by awkward humor, buried resentments, and emotional thawing. Baroux resists melodrama, letting the characters speak through silence and discomfort. The film is grounded, visually unflashy, and all the more affecting for it.
With strong performances, especially from Vincent and David Ayala as the gentle caregiver Rudy, On ira explores mortality with grace and wit. Quiet, offbeat, and deeply human-it lingers long after the credits roll.
Luc Besson's *Dracula* tries to be bold and artistic but ends up as an over-stylized, slow-moving mess. While the visuals are striking, they can't hide the film's self-indulgent pacing and lack of real scares. The story drags, weighed down by pretentious themes and melodramatic performances. Dracula himself is more mopey than menacing, and the supposed emotional depth feels forced. Strangely, the film borrows heavily in tone and aesthetic from Patrick Süskind's *Perfume*-the same obsessive atmosphere, the same brooding romanticism-but without the narrative clarity or psychological sharpness. Besson's ambition to "reimagine" the legend results in a film that's more style than substance. Despite its glossy presentation, this version of *Dracula* is cold, derivative, and ultimately forgettable.