Récit en trois parties du pire attentat terroriste commis en Norvège dans lequel plus de soixante-dix personnes ont été tuées. Le 22 juillet se penche sur le désastre, les survivants, le sys... Tout lireRécit en trois parties du pire attentat terroriste commis en Norvège dans lequel plus de soixante-dix personnes ont été tuées. Le 22 juillet se penche sur le désastre, les survivants, le système politique norvégien et les avocats qui ont travaillé sur cette affaire horrible.Récit en trois parties du pire attentat terroriste commis en Norvège dans lequel plus de soixante-dix personnes ont été tuées. Le 22 juillet se penche sur le désastre, les survivants, le système politique norvégien et les avocats qui ont travaillé sur cette affaire horrible.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
- Prime Minister Aide #1
- (as Marit Adeleide Andreassen)
- Simon Sæbø
- (as Thor-Harald Normann)
- Breivik's Mother
- (as Hilde Olausson)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesCaused great controversy in Norway when it became known that a film was being made about the attacks by Anders Behring Breivik. A campaign generating over 20.000 signatures against the film was established.
- GaffesWhen Viljar is at the hospital on Svalbard, a sign saying "Matsalur" is visible. This is Icelandic for "cafeteria", showing that this part of the movie was filmed on Iceland.
- Citations
Judge Wenche Arntzen: Can you tell us what happened to you on Utøya, Viljar?
Viljar: Yes.
[has a flashback in his head]
Viljar: He tried to... he tried to kill me. I remember... seeing him... and then running away... trying to find somewhere to hide, and protecting my little brother. I remember being shot. Five times. When I was lying on the beach, I was... all alone. In a kind of pain I couldn't imagine.
Judge Wenche Arntzen: But now you are here.
Viljar: But everything's different. I've had to relearn how to use my body. Learn how to walk again. How to feed myself again. I have little use of my left arm, and I'm... I'm blind on one eye. But that's, uh... that's a relief.
Judge Wenche Arntzen: A relief. How do you mean?
Viljar: [laughs shakily] A relief, in a way that at least now I don't have to look at him.
[some of the people in the audience laugh briefly]
Viljar: But of course it's not that simple. I... I have a fragment of his bullet lodged in my brain that could kill me at any time. And I don't look like the person I used to anymore, I... My body, it's... it's broken. And the worst is that he... he killed Anders and Simon, my best friends. Stopping them from making their mark on the world, and... and they would have made it a better place. And I... I miss them every day. I'm sorry, I... I didn't... I didn't want to cry. I so much didn't want to cry in front of him. I... I wanted to stay strong. Because I do this for them. So they will not be forgotten. And when you shot them and left me alone on the beach, I didn't know if I was living or dying. And I've been stuck there ever since. But now... I realize that I got a choice. Because I still have a family... and friends... and memories. Dreams. Hope. And love. And he doesn't. He's... completely alone. And he's going to rot there in prison, whereas I... I survived. And I choose to live.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Front Row: Episode #3.7 (2018)
- Bandes originalesHun er forelska i lærer'n
Written by Dag Ingebrigtsen and Torstein Flakne
We know Greengrass for directing excellent action-thrillers based on actual events (other than three Bourne films): United 93, Captain Phillips and Bloody Sunday are all accounts set in narrow time frames, that focus mainly on the action and have a documentaristic style.
When I first heard of '22 July', I thought it would be another action-thriller, focusing mostly or esclusively on the attack itself. The title seemed to suggest this too. I particularly liked United 93, so I really hoped for this film to follow that style. When, at the 30 minutes mark, the part focusing on the actual attack ended, I felt a bit disappointed.
Around three quarters of the film focus on the aftermath of the event, probably to differentiate it from another film being released this year that is also about the 22 July terrorist attack, but focuses solely on the events that occured on the island. This choice allows however some depth to the film, and introduces some deeper political subthemes that an action-thriller film would have not been able to tackle. A central theme of the movie, for instance, is right-wing extremism, a very actual topic in Europe and western society of nowadays.
The entire film is composed by two parallel narratives, one focusing on the perpetrator and the other on one of the victims. The two narratives have two meeting points, when the two characters they're focused on meet for the first time, and towards the end of the film. The parallelism is very strong in most of the scenes of the film, another remarkable aspect.
I particularly appreciated the choice of using norvegian actors for all the roles, an element that added realism. The actor portraying the terrorist did a particularly good performance.
So, don't expect to watch a thriller, but rather a "based on real events" film directed by maybe the best living filmmaker that had a past in war-reporting journalism.
- Come-and-Review
- 9 oct. 2018
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
- How long is 22 July?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Norway
- Lieux de tournage
- Siglufjörður, Iceland(Svalbard, Norway)
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 20 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée2 heures 23 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1