Dorothy, l'héritière du trône d'Oz, doit le reprendre à l'abject Premier Ministre Kruel avec l'aide de trois ouvriers agricoles.Dorothy, l'héritière du trône d'Oz, doit le reprendre à l'abject Premier Ministre Kruel avec l'aide de trois ouvriers agricoles.Dorothy, l'héritière du trône d'Oz, doit le reprendre à l'abject Premier Ministre Kruel avec l'aide de trois ouvriers agricoles.
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Oliver Hardy
- Woodsman
- (as Oliver N. Hardy)
- …
Spencer Bell
- Cowardly Lion
- (as G. Howe Black)
- …
Rosalind Byrne
- Herald Trumpeter
- (uncredited)
Chester Conklin
- Undetermined Role
- (unconfirmed)
- (uncredited)
Wanda Hawley
- Undetermined Role
- (unconfirmed)
- (uncredited)
Jean Johnston
- Little Girl in open & close
- (uncredited)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMany theatres that booked the film never received it because its production caused Chadwick Pictures to go bankrupt, and distribution ceased long before it was intended to.
- GaffesThe plane that brings Kruel's emissaries from Oz to Kansas is a triplane in midair but a biplane when it lands.
- Citations
Prime Minister Kruel: Do your stuff, Wizzy!
- Autres versions2005 DVD release on Warner Brothers (as a bonus feature with the 1939 version) alternates between sepia tone-colored images and blue-tinted images.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Wiz on Down the Road (1978)
Commentaire en vedette
This movie was reportedly the one that sunk Larry Semon's career. Instead of the usual short films he was known for, Semon decided to do something "important" and made this (for the time) long film adaptation of THE WIZARD OF OZ,....or at least that's what the title indicates it should be. The story, it seems, bears little similarity to either the 1939 movie or the books. In fact, apart from a few names here and there, it is pretty much unrecognizable as the story about Dorothy and Oz. Instead, it was just an excuse to string along a lot of familiar and not especially funny gags--like I have seen in several other Larry Semon films, the big stunt is his swinging from tower to tower. A neat stunt the first time you see it, but not when it's old material and has nothing to do with the plot.
Overall, I consider this movie a wasted effort. I know that Semon COULD be funny--like he was in his short films. But here, it's just a confusing and dreary mess. Likewise, having Oliver Hardy in the film SHOULD have been an asset, but he was pretty much wasted as well. While not exactly a classic, the 1910 short silent version was much better and stuck closer to the original story and the 1939 version is a classic. This one is better off staying forgotten or seen by the morbidly curious as the project that may have ultimately destroyed Semon's career.
PS--In addition to being a terrible movie, there is a Black man named "Snowflake" that likes to eat watermelon! Ugghh!!!
Overall, I consider this movie a wasted effort. I know that Semon COULD be funny--like he was in his short films. But here, it's just a confusing and dreary mess. Likewise, having Oliver Hardy in the film SHOULD have been an asset, but he was pretty much wasted as well. While not exactly a classic, the 1910 short silent version was much better and stuck closer to the original story and the 1939 version is a classic. This one is better off staying forgotten or seen by the morbidly curious as the project that may have ultimately destroyed Semon's career.
PS--In addition to being a terrible movie, there is a Black man named "Snowflake" that likes to eat watermelon! Ugghh!!!
- planktonrules
- 12 oct. 2006
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 35 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Wizard of Oz (1925) officially released in India in English?
Répondre