ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,7/10
2,9 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn eccentric scientist helps a fugitive from the law become invisible, unwittingly giving him the power to exact revenge on his former friends.An eccentric scientist helps a fugitive from the law become invisible, unwittingly giving him the power to exact revenge on his former friends.An eccentric scientist helps a fugitive from the law become invisible, unwittingly giving him the power to exact revenge on his former friends.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Leyland Hodgson
- Sir Frederick Travers
- (as Leland Hodgson)
Jimmy Aubrey
- Wedderburn - the Innkeeper
- (uncredited)
Billy Bevan
- Police Sergeant
- (uncredited)
Ted Billings
- Bettor in Pub
- (uncredited)
Lillian Bronson
- Norma - the Maid
- (uncredited)
Leonard Carey
- The Police Constable
- (uncredited)
Russell Custer
- Pub Patron
- (uncredited)
Janna DeLoos
- Nellie
- (uncredited)
Tom Dillon
- Ned Towle - Darts Expert
- (uncredited)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is generally considered to be Universal's last entry in the 'Invisible Man' series. Seven years later the studio spoofed the series with Deux nigauds et l'homme invisible (1951).
- GaffesWhen Robert Griffin is giving himself the blood transfusion he is pumping the syringe but not working the two valves that directs the blood from one body to another like what the doctor did earlier in the movie.
- Citations
Dr. Peter Drury: In this house, you've got to believe what you can't see.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Classic Nightmares: The Invisible Man's Revenge (1958)
Commentaire en vedette
Generally speaking, the horror films from the "New Universal" period (1937-1946) aren't as good as the ones from the era when Carl Laemmle, Sr. and Jr., were still in control of the studio (though "Son of Dracula," a moody masterpiece, is not only the best in Universal's vampire cycle but the finest vampire film ever made in the U.S.). "The Invisible Man's Revenge" isn't the equal of the peerless 1933 Laemmle-era original, but it's certainly better than the previous run of "New Universal" Invisible Man movies. Jon Hall, relatively dull as the hero in "Invisible Agent," proves surprisingly effective as a full-throated villain (in this version he's a psychotic madman BEFORE becoming invisible); Leon Errol's dry wit is several cuts above the usual un-funny "comic relief" in these films; Lester Matthews and Gale Sondergaard make a nice guilt-ridden couple for the Invisible Man to have his titular revenge on; Alan Curtis and Evelyn Ankers are certainly more than competent as the romantic leads; John Carradine is in good form as the rather dotty scientist with the invisibility formula; and the direction by Ford Beebe, usually a name associated with Universal serials, is convincingly Gothic and well-paced. Universal was on the downgrade as a horror studio by then (and their only further foray into invisible man-dom would be an Abbott and Costello vehicle in 1953) and some of the effects work is sloppy, but on the whole this film is convincing and vividly atmospheric. Incidentally, in "The Face of Marble" from Monogram two years later (another underrated film with a fine sense of atmosphere even though its plot doesn't make a lick of sense even by the meager standards of horror fantasies!), John Carradine also played a mad scientist who had a dog named Brutus.
- mgconlan-1
- 31 oct. 2008
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Invisible Man's Revenge?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- La venganza del hombre invisible
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 1 669 226 $ US
- Durée1 heure 18 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Spanish language plot outline for The Invisible Man's Revenge (1944)?
Répondre