ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,0/10
3,7 k
MA NOTE
Après avoir purgé une peine de prison qui devait être destinée à son partenaire, un truand retrouve ce dernier à la tête d'une boîte de nuit huppée et sans aucune intention de partager les b... Tout lireAprès avoir purgé une peine de prison qui devait être destinée à son partenaire, un truand retrouve ce dernier à la tête d'une boîte de nuit huppée et sans aucune intention de partager les bénéfices.Après avoir purgé une peine de prison qui devait être destinée à son partenaire, un truand retrouve ce dernier à la tête d'une boîte de nuit huppée et sans aucune intention de partager les bénéfices.
Jorge Rigaud
- Maurice
- (as George Rigaud)
Bobby Barber
- Newsboy
- (uncredited)
Brooks Benedict
- Nightclub Patron
- (uncredited)
John Bishop
- Ben
- (uncredited)
Charles D. Brown
- Police Lt. Hollaran
- (uncredited)
Gino Corrado
- George
- (uncredited)
James Davies
- Masseur
- (uncredited)
Jean Del Val
- Henri--Chef
- (uncredited)
Jimmie Dundee
- Hijack Driver
- (uncredited)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis was the first film in which Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster were teamed. In total, they made seven films together.
- Gaffes(at around 1h 27 mins) The main characters are travelling back to the city. After they pay the toll-booth attendant to cross a bridge, the car they are travelling in is seen speeding along beneath some elevated railway tracks. However, it is seen driving on the left side of the road, rather than the right side, for the USA. Some signage in the background is also reversed. An editing error (i.e., footage got spliced in upside down) or it was deliberately put in this way to give the viewer the impression the car was travelling west to east.
- Citations
Nick Palestro: For a buck, you'd double-cross your own mother.
Skinner: Why not? She'd do the same to me.
- ConnexionsEdited into Les Cadavres ne portent pas de costard (1982)
- Bandes originalesDon't Call It Love
Lyrics by Ned Washington
Music by Allie Wrubel
Dubbed by Trudy Stevens (uncredited)
[Kay (Lizabeth Scott) sings the song at the club]
Commentaire en vedette
No need to recap the plot. There's one key scene unlike anything in the rest of 40's noir. Frankie (Lancaster) invades Dink's (Douglas) office to muscle in on what he's owed of Dink's big operation. But Frankie's a gangster of the uncomplicated 1930's, while Dink's a white-collar criminal of the coming 1950's. So. By the time Dink's accountant Dave (Corey) is through answering each of Frankie's threats with another layer of corporate ownership that can't possibly be divided, Frankie's reduced to a bundle of quivering frustration. In short, Dave has beaten all Frankie's assembled thugs with what amounts to a maze of legalese. As a result, piles of paper prove ultimately more powerful than gangs of gunmen in what amounts to a great unexpected scene.
All in all. The movie's decent 40's noir, long on atmosphere but too long on talk, at least to my liking. I suspect the screenplay was tailored to showcase producer Wallis's top 3 new stars, especially Scott who gets a lot of romantic dialog along with sultry screen time. The overall result is a movie composed of too many under-blended showcase scenes- - some quite good-- that nevertheless don't really gel into a compelling whole. It's the kind of movie where the stars are more memorable than the story.
Scott and Douglas, for example, really shine. Scott does some of the best acting of her career as the conflicted glamour girl. But I especially like Douglas's slimy version of a smooth-talking mastermind who's so self-assured, you can't wait to see him get what he's got coming. Douglas's early career specialized in such compromised types, a revelation to those only familiar with his later, more heroic, career. For his part, Lancaster does well enough with his distinctive looks, but Frankie is a less showy role than the other two.
Anyway, one thing for sure—producer Wallis certainly had an eagle eye for new talent, as this movie more than demonstrates.
All in all. The movie's decent 40's noir, long on atmosphere but too long on talk, at least to my liking. I suspect the screenplay was tailored to showcase producer Wallis's top 3 new stars, especially Scott who gets a lot of romantic dialog along with sultry screen time. The overall result is a movie composed of too many under-blended showcase scenes- - some quite good-- that nevertheless don't really gel into a compelling whole. It's the kind of movie where the stars are more memorable than the story.
Scott and Douglas, for example, really shine. Scott does some of the best acting of her career as the conflicted glamour girl. But I especially like Douglas's slimy version of a smooth-talking mastermind who's so self-assured, you can't wait to see him get what he's got coming. Douglas's early career specialized in such compromised types, a revelation to those only familiar with his later, more heroic, career. For his part, Lancaster does well enough with his distinctive looks, but Frankie is a less showy role than the other two.
Anyway, one thing for sure—producer Wallis certainly had an eagle eye for new talent, as this movie more than demonstrates.
- dougdoepke
- 16 sept. 2011
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is I Walk Alone?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 14 Jahre Sing-Sing
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 122 $ US
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was I Walk Alone (1947) officially released in India in English?
Répondre