ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,2/10
3,6 k
MA NOTE
Les adolescents Libby et Kit passent innocemment une soirée à faire des blagues au hasard. Ces appels ont des conséquences meurtrières.Les adolescents Libby et Kit passent innocemment une soirée à faire des blagues au hasard. Ces appels ont des conséquences meurtrières.Les adolescents Libby et Kit passent innocemment une soirée à faire des blagues au hasard. Ces appels ont des conséquences meurtrières.
Sara Lane
- Kit Austin
- (as Sarah Lane)
Sara Anderson
- Jill Adams
- (uncredited)
Russ Bender
- Police Sgt. Harris
- (uncredited)
Dee Carroll
- Telephone Operator
- (uncredited)
John Crowther
- Tommy Kane
- (uncredited)
Douglas Evans
- Tom Ward
- (uncredited)
Janet Hamill
- Linda Carson
- (uncredited)
Tom Hatten
- Gerald Nyes
- (uncredited)
Glen Vernon
- John Adams
- (uncredited)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJoan Crawford was approached for this film one month after she left Hush... Hush, Sweet Charlotte (1964) due to an "ailment" that prevented her from working (which is believed to have actually been sick of working with her arch enemy Bette Davis). Therefore, William Castle requested that Crawford's doctors sign a statement attesting that she was completely well before giving her the role.
- GaffesDuring the struggle in the shower with Marek and his wife, her hair goes back and forth from wet, dry, then back to wet again.
- Citations
[repeated line]
Libby Mannering, Kit Austin: I saw what you did, and I know who you are.
- Générique farfeluClosing credit (over picture of phone lines): "The End of the Line."
- ConnexionsFeatured in Coming Soon (1982)
Commentaire en vedette
Yes, good old William Castle is on the loose again, with a low budget and a creepy plot...and Joan Crawford, whose salary probably used up most of Castle's available cash.
You know you're in trouble from the first few scenes, with corny eyeball-shaped framing devices, then the intrusion of Van Alexander's completely out-of-place bouncy score, with its recurring principal theme of "Ninny nanny noo-noo." (Most of his credits are for 60s sitcoms, and it shows.) Then we're treated to exteriors of the Mannering house which are nothing more than Thomas Kincade- style paintings. (Virtually the whole film was shot on a sound stage, except for some rear projections.)
The plot itself is clichéd, but decently "executed." The casting is a problem, with Joan Crawford at age 60 trying to be the hypotenuse in a love triangle between 50-year-old John Ireland and some young bimbo (or we should say, ex-bimbo). Not much choice there. The two teenage girls are straight out of 60s sitcom land, and the younger sister joins the ranks of "most annoying child actors." There are some tense moments, including a ripoff of the shower scene from "Psycho" (except with a naked man instead of Janet Leigh).
And since we're already knee-deep in 60s sitcoms with the trite score and giggly teenaged actors, we're given an ending that would have been right in place on Dobie Gillis or the Patty Duke Show. Except with a dead body.
You know you're in trouble from the first few scenes, with corny eyeball-shaped framing devices, then the intrusion of Van Alexander's completely out-of-place bouncy score, with its recurring principal theme of "Ninny nanny noo-noo." (Most of his credits are for 60s sitcoms, and it shows.) Then we're treated to exteriors of the Mannering house which are nothing more than Thomas Kincade- style paintings. (Virtually the whole film was shot on a sound stage, except for some rear projections.)
The plot itself is clichéd, but decently "executed." The casting is a problem, with Joan Crawford at age 60 trying to be the hypotenuse in a love triangle between 50-year-old John Ireland and some young bimbo (or we should say, ex-bimbo). Not much choice there. The two teenage girls are straight out of 60s sitcom land, and the younger sister joins the ranks of "most annoying child actors." There are some tense moments, including a ripoff of the shower scene from "Psycho" (except with a naked man instead of Janet Leigh).
And since we're already knee-deep in 60s sitcoms with the trite score and giggly teenaged actors, we're given an ending that would have been right in place on Dobie Gillis or the Patty Duke Show. Except with a dead body.
- LCShackley
- 6 sept. 2009
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- I Saw What You Did
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 22 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Tuer n'est pas jouer (1965) officially released in India in English?
Répondre