La Communauté de l'Anneau se lance dans un voyage pour détruire l'Anneau Unique et mettre fin au règne de Sauron sur la Terre du Milieu.La Communauté de l'Anneau se lance dans un voyage pour détruire l'Anneau Unique et mettre fin au règne de Sauron sur la Terre du Milieu.La Communauté de l'Anneau se lance dans un voyage pour détruire l'Anneau Unique et mettre fin au règne de Sauron sur la Terre du Milieu.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 3 nominations au total
Christopher Guard
- Frodo
- (voice)
William Squire
- Gandalf
- (voice)
Michael Scholes
- Sam
- (voice)
Simon Chandler
- Merry
- (voice)
Dominic Guard
- Pippin
- (voice)
Norman Bird
- Bilbo
- (voice)
Michael Graham Cox
- Boromir
- (voice)
- (as Michael Graham-Cox)
Anthony Daniels
- Legolas
- (voice)
David Buck
- Gimli
- (voice)
Peter Woodthorpe
- Gollum
- (voice)
Fraser Kerr
- Saruman
- (voice)
Philip Stone
- Theoden
- (voice)
Michael Deacon
- Wormtongue
- (voice)
André Morell
- Elrond
- (voice)
- (as Andre Morell)
Alan Tilvern
- Innkeeper
- (voice)
Annette Crosbie
- Galadriel
- (voice)
John Westbrook
- Treebeard
- (voice)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPredominantly filmed with live actors in black-and-white and rotoscoped, each animation cel drawn over a film frame of an actor. However, several sequences do not use rotoscoping.
- GaffesThe name of the wizard of Isengard fluctuates between "Saruman" and "Aruman" throughout the movie.
- Autres versionsThe version screened on British TV in the 1980s contains more music than the recently-released VHS and DVD version.
- ConnexionsEdited from Aleksandr Nevskiy (1938)
Commentaire en vedette
I'm fond of this film and it vexes me that so many "reviewers" rank it below the Peter Jackson trilogy. A filmed novel is always interpretive; in particular an animated film relies on the artist's vision and should be judged on its own terms. Speaking as a purist, this is a finer homage to Tolkien than the updated version. While this film has its flaws it stays truer to the source, especially so far as the characters are concerned.
In the Jackson version Tolkien's Frodo is barely recognizable: from the first scenes he is portrayed as a weakling, constantly wavering, manipulated by forces around him and never standing on his own two feet (this is physically and metaphorically true.) You wonder why fate chose this limp biscuit to carry the one ring to the Cracks of Doom. Jackson unforgivably rewrites Tolkien and robs Frodo of his finest moment when he allows Arwen to rescue him from the Ringwraiths...Bakshi's version respects the original, presenting a Frodo who demands the wraiths "Go back and trouble me no more!" Bakshi sustains Frodo's character as Tolkien conceived it. We see his decline as the weight of his burden increases. Frodo is so pivotal to Lord of the Rings you wonder why Jackson took such liberties (he does so with numerous characters)since character development propels the plot to its inevitable conclusion. Bakshi's film better explores the companionship between Legolas and Gimli in a few judicious scenes that are completely lacking in Jackson's version. Similarly we see Boromir horsing with Pippin and Merry, furthering the idea of fellowship. For my liking the camaraderie is more developed in the animated version than the live action.
Tolkien's poetry is an important ingredient in the novels and Bakshi makes tribute to this in one of my favorite scenes: when Frodo sings the "Merry Old Inn" song, minutes before stumbling into Strider. The cheery tune is chillingly juxtaposed with the darker theme music when seconds later, invisible to his friends but visible to the wraiths, Frodo is dangerously exposed. This is one of the most atmospheric portions of the film and chills me whenever I see it.
The well documented budget/time restrictions limit this film's final impact but had it been completed it may have resonated with more viewers. As it is, it's worth a look. Even its detractors admit that Peter Jackson derived much of his inspiration from this prototype.
In the Jackson version Tolkien's Frodo is barely recognizable: from the first scenes he is portrayed as a weakling, constantly wavering, manipulated by forces around him and never standing on his own two feet (this is physically and metaphorically true.) You wonder why fate chose this limp biscuit to carry the one ring to the Cracks of Doom. Jackson unforgivably rewrites Tolkien and robs Frodo of his finest moment when he allows Arwen to rescue him from the Ringwraiths...Bakshi's version respects the original, presenting a Frodo who demands the wraiths "Go back and trouble me no more!" Bakshi sustains Frodo's character as Tolkien conceived it. We see his decline as the weight of his burden increases. Frodo is so pivotal to Lord of the Rings you wonder why Jackson took such liberties (he does so with numerous characters)since character development propels the plot to its inevitable conclusion. Bakshi's film better explores the companionship between Legolas and Gimli in a few judicious scenes that are completely lacking in Jackson's version. Similarly we see Boromir horsing with Pippin and Merry, furthering the idea of fellowship. For my liking the camaraderie is more developed in the animated version than the live action.
Tolkien's poetry is an important ingredient in the novels and Bakshi makes tribute to this in one of my favorite scenes: when Frodo sings the "Merry Old Inn" song, minutes before stumbling into Strider. The cheery tune is chillingly juxtaposed with the darker theme music when seconds later, invisible to his friends but visible to the wraiths, Frodo is dangerously exposed. This is one of the most atmospheric portions of the film and chills me whenever I see it.
The well documented budget/time restrictions limit this film's final impact but had it been completed it may have resonated with more viewers. As it is, it's worth a look. Even its detractors admit that Peter Jackson derived much of his inspiration from this prototype.
- cdunbar-3
- 30 juill. 2006
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Everything New on Max in December
Everything New on Max in December
Looking for something different to add to your Watchlist? Take a peek at what movies and TV shows are coming to streaming this month.
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Lord of the Rings
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 4 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 30 471 420 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 626 649 $ US
- 19 nov. 1978
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 30 477 175 $ US
- Durée2 heures 12 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le seigneur des anneaux (1978) officially released in India in English?
Répondre