Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA guy and four of his friends visit his crippled uncle, a taxidermist who lives with his housekeeper next to a movie set. Pretty soon people start being killed in the manner they are in the ... Tout lireA guy and four of his friends visit his crippled uncle, a taxidermist who lives with his housekeeper next to a movie set. Pretty soon people start being killed in the manner they are in the script of the movie being filmed next door.A guy and four of his friends visit his crippled uncle, a taxidermist who lives with his housekeeper next to a movie set. Pretty soon people start being killed in the manner they are in the script of the movie being filmed next door.
- Gene
- (as Jude Gerard)
- Uncle Ive
- (as Ted Lehman)
- Evil Spirit
- (as Dana Evanson)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- Citations
[first lines]
Ms Camden: Who's down there?
Thorn: Just me, Ms. Camden.
Ms Camden: Mr. Thorn, what business have you in the cellar?
Thorn: Settin' traps, ma'am.
Ms Camden: I realize you are new around here. However, your responsibilities lie outside of the house. I suggest that you return to yours at once.
Thorn: Yes, ma'am.
- Générique farfeluLenny Delducca is on the beginning of the movie credited as "Lenny Delducca", on the end of the movie as "Lenny Delduca".
- ConnexionsReferences Bambi (1942)
- Bandes originalesNight of Our Lives
Written and Performed by Azha
Lyrics by Azha and John Gonzalez
Produced by John Gonzalez
The practical effects are perhaps a tad modest stood next to those of other contemporary fare, but they still look good enough; the stunts are more plainly admirable. The same quite goes for the art direction. Thomas Dewier's direction, and the acting, aren't exactly the top of the line, but if nothing else, I've certainly seen worse. The broad concept is definitely one that we've seen before - a piece of media, in this case a film script, that causes death and destruction around it - and have again since, but there's no rule that says other filmmakers can't explore their own renditions of an idea. The details of the writing that flesh out that concept, included but not limited to how the script in this instance came into being, are much more questionable; the plot feels a little thin, stretching to make itself work. Some specific moments are extra dubious, like a dream sequence that fills a few minutes in the latter half. Be that as it may, I think the end result is still suitably solid, and I see the hard work that all involved put into the final product.
Still, however much earnest effort was being applied, the fact remains that 'Death by dialogue' is just kind of weak. Though some aspects are much less sure-footed, I don't think anything here is altogether bad; rather, it's just that nothing here bears enough strength - not even in combination - to really make an especially good impression. It never attains the vibrancy to be distinctly striking, is never discretely fun enough to meaningfully come off as a lark like some of its more cheeky brethren, and is probably longer than it should've been. The feature just somewhat languishes in the unremarkable middle - mildly enjoyable, but not entirely convincing, and with shortcomings more evident than any major value. I wonder if I'm not being too harsh; on the other hand, maybe I'm being too generous. I think it's still passably worthwhile as something very light to have on in the background on a lazy day, something that neither requires nor inspires viewer investment. Suffice to say, however, that if you're looking for something more wholehearted and committed, more thrilling, or more impactful, you're best served by passing up 'Death by dialogue' and looking elsewhere.
- I_Ailurophile
- 18 oct. 2023
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Couleur