Un ancien agent de la CIA, John Creasy, est embauché comme garde du corps pour une fille en Italie, qui devient la fille qu'il n'a jamais eue. Quand elle est enlevée, sa rage se déchaîne, et... Tout lireUn ancien agent de la CIA, John Creasy, est embauché comme garde du corps pour une fille en Italie, qui devient la fille qu'il n'a jamais eue. Quand elle est enlevée, sa rage se déchaîne, et il se lance dans une sanglante vengeance.Un ancien agent de la CIA, John Creasy, est embauché comme garde du corps pour une fille en Italie, qui devient la fille qu'il n'a jamais eue. Quand elle est enlevée, sa rage se déchaîne, et il se lance dans une sanglante vengeance.
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesTony Scott was originally slated to direct, but the studio balked because at the time they felt he was not accomplished enough to pull off the project. He would go on to direct the second adaptation L'homme en feu (2004).
- GaffesIn the second scene in the bedroom, Sam is at the window talking to Creasy and wearing a white top with a wavy edge to the sleeves. She's then seen getting onto her bed and the top now has smooth edges to the sleeves.
- Citations
[last title card]
Title Card: "Guys like us ain't got nobody in the world...... but not us, Lenny said." John Steinbeck "Of Mice and Men"
- ConnexionsFeatured in Sven Uslings Bio: Sämsta filmer 2019 Del 1: Plats 20-11 (2020)
- Bandes originalesSomeone to Watch Over Me
Words and Music by George Gershwin (as George) and Ira Gershwin
Published by 'WB Music Corp. [us]' All Rights Reserved
It's definitely not an usual revenge flick. It seems more focused on its characters and drama really but this of course is not necessarily a bad thing. It actually makes this movie a pretty refreshing and original one within its genre. And having said that, it's not like the movie is all drama. It of course is still being filled with plenty of straightforward action, in its second.
And you would think that this is when the movie becomes truly good and interesting. However in this case I have to say I liked the first half, so its drama and buildup, better than the second, more action filled, one. I just liked the story and far slower pace of the movie its first half way better. It was a genuinely good movie, while its action part comes across as far more standard and the story suddenly got pushed to the background. Besides, director Élie Chouraqui was obviously far more at ease with telling a story than at handling the action really. It's still good and fun enough action all but it just still feels like the second half of the movie is doing a good job at destroying what the first half of the movie had been building up. In that regard this movie is totally the opposite of its remake, in which the second half and all of its action parts were its highlights.
With its pacing and buildup this definitely feels more like a foreign movie, which is not all that surprising really, considering that it had a French director at the helm. But this approach is actually what makes the movie work out as something special and refreshing. I however don't think simply just everybody will be able to appreciate this approach. especially of course when you are expecting a more straightforward action flick.
And for such a low key movie, it definitely has a great cast in it. Scott Glenn, Joe Pesci, Jonathan Pryce, all in one movie, that's pretty awesome! And there are all really right at place within this movie as well. Scott Glenn is a great leading man to have, when the main character is supposed to be a grumpy, tough guy, with his heart still at the right place.
Maybe it's only just a half successful movie but it's still really worth giving a go!
7/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
- Boba_Fett1138
- 3 janv. 2012
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Man on Fire?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 519 596 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 258 812 $ US
- 11 oct. 1987
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 519 596 $ US
- Durée1 heure 32 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1