ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,7/10
4,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.When he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.When he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.
Roxann Dawson
- Angela Rooker
- (as Roxann Biggs-Dawson)
Joel Bissonnette
- Mayo
- (as Joel Bissonette)
Christopher Bondy
- Gibson
- (as Chris Bondy)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilmed simultaneously with Darkman II: Le retour de Durant (1995) between November 15, 1993 and December 20, 1993, but not released until going direct-to-video on August 20, 1996.
- GaffesIn Darkman II, Peyton learns how to extend the 'life' of the synthetic skin from 99 minutes to over 150 minutes. This technology, while apparently so simple Peyton is surprised he never thought of it in the previous film, is never seen again.
- Citations
Johnny Lee: I don't get it, Rooker. Your organization handles coke, weed, crank. But you - you show up to supervise a two-bit shipment of steroids.
Peter Rooker: I'm not into drugs.
Johnny Lee: [chuckling] What the fuck do you call this shit?
Peter Rooker: Strength.
- ConnexionsEdited from Darkman (1990)
Commentaire en vedette
This movie in fact is probably every bit as good as the second sequel.One of my complaints about this movie is the change in the character of Peyton Westlake/Darkman. In the first movie he was a tortured man battling strong demons within himself, whereas in this movie he seems to be fully developed into a wise-cracking comic book type character. We only get a small hint of Darkman's emotional state throughout the entire film and that's about it.
I think this movie's was made as an action movie rather than anything else. The action sequences aren't bad either.
Also Jeff Fahey's character, Rooker is good but feels somewhat shallow, as if more of the character needed to be developed before we could believe he was truly evil. Arnold Vosloo is an interesting choice to play Darkman and brings his own style to the character. Add to this the plight of Darkman falling in love again and having to painfully remember that he can never share his feelings with another person and you have the makings of a good movie.
Maybe they should have spent more time on the characters than the action. Maybe this would have made the movie better. But nevertheless it is still quite an entertaining movie and works well if you don't stop to think about it. 6/10
I think this movie's was made as an action movie rather than anything else. The action sequences aren't bad either.
Also Jeff Fahey's character, Rooker is good but feels somewhat shallow, as if more of the character needed to be developed before we could believe he was truly evil. Arnold Vosloo is an interesting choice to play Darkman and brings his own style to the character. Add to this the plight of Darkman falling in love again and having to painfully remember that he can never share his feelings with another person and you have the makings of a good movie.
Maybe they should have spent more time on the characters than the action. Maybe this would have made the movie better. But nevertheless it is still quite an entertaining movie and works well if you don't stop to think about it. 6/10
- alfred_zamora
- 17 juin 2000
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 27 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant