ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,9/10
15 k
MA NOTE
Travaillant dans une station de pêche dans un cadre idyllique, mais entourée de diverses facettes du désagrément humain, une jeune femme muette tombe en amour d'un homme fuyant la loi.Travaillant dans une station de pêche dans un cadre idyllique, mais entourée de diverses facettes du désagrément humain, une jeune femme muette tombe en amour d'un homme fuyant la loi.Travaillant dans une station de pêche dans un cadre idyllique, mais entourée de diverses facettes du désagrément humain, une jeune femme muette tombe en amour d'un homme fuyant la loi.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Prix
- 6 victoires et 7 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis fell foul of the British Board of Film Classification who demanded cuts, not because of the scene where a metal object is inserted into a vagina but of cruelty to fish, which director Kim Ki-duk admitted was genuine.
- Autres versionsThe cut UK print was submitted to the Irish censor who cited the violence as causing concern - he gave the distributor (Tartan Films) two options:
- Resubmit the same version (presumably for an appeal/reconsideration)
- Submit an altered version to secure a certificate
- ConnexionsReferenced in Bom yeoreum gaeul gyeoul geurigo bom (2003)
Commentaire en vedette
Wow, where to start with this. Ki Duk Kim has always been a divisive director, with his films showing slow burning, very natural, almost spiritual human traits. This though is like a magnified version of a Ki Duk Kim film. It's low budget, set in a single location, stunningly beautiful, very gruesome in parts, explicit and controversial. It centres around a lonely woman (Hee Jin) who delivers bait to tourist fisherman. What we see unfold is a symbolism heavy ride into a twisted / tumultuous relationship between Hee Jin and a visitor. It's full of breathtaking cinematography, sparse dialogue and one of the most stomach churning suicide attempts I've ever seen on screen. As usual with Ki Duk Kim, water as a symbol is featured heavily, and so are animals and nature. Quite why certain little creatures are sacrificed on screen I'm not sure though. A warning to anyone who is easily offended by animal cruelty - don't watch this movie.
What does it all mean in the end? I'm torn between it being an entire metaphor for how difficult relationships can be / an exploration into gender roles or a simple descent into madness tale. Maybe all 3. It is a heck of an experience though. Think of a Pedro Almodóvar movie mixed with a bit of Takashi Miike, maybe with a bit of Haneke in there too, and you may get the picture.
It's beautiful yet gruesome. I have to take a mark off for the animal cruelty, as it is bordering on unacceptable levels at times, but it still gets a 7.5/10
What does it all mean in the end? I'm torn between it being an entire metaphor for how difficult relationships can be / an exploration into gender roles or a simple descent into madness tale. Maybe all 3. It is a heck of an experience though. Think of a Pedro Almodóvar movie mixed with a bit of Takashi Miike, maybe with a bit of Haneke in there too, and you may get the picture.
It's beautiful yet gruesome. I have to take a mark off for the animal cruelty, as it is bordering on unacceptable levels at times, but it still gets a 7.5/10
- Smallclone100
- 13 juin 2018
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Isle?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 20 666 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 4 546 $ US
- 25 août 2002
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 24 963 $ US
- Durée1 heure 30 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant