ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,9/10
91 k
MA NOTE
Le gangster Paul Vitti est remis aux soins du Dr Ben Sobol, où le chaos continue.Le gangster Paul Vitti est remis aux soins du Dr Ben Sobol, où le chaos continue.Le gangster Paul Vitti est remis aux soins du Dr Ben Sobol, où le chaos continue.
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Cathy Moriarty
- Patti LoPresti
- (as Cathy Moriarty-Gentile)
Scott Dillin
- Prison Guard
- (as Scotty Dillin)
Joyce Brothers
- Dr. Joyce Brothers
- (as Dr. Joyce Brothers)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Mercedes that chases Paul and Ben had to be modified for filming, since that brand of car does not swerve very well in high-speed pursuits.
- GaffesAt the end of Analyse-moi ça (1999), Ben says Paul was only sentenced to 18 months, or 1.5 years, in prison. However at the beginning of this movie, Paul is released from prison after 2.5 years.
- Citations
Dr. Ben Sobel: I thought you were in prison?
Jelly: It would appear not.
Dr. Ben Sobel: Well, well, how'd you get out?
Jelly: I had a new trial. It turns out that the evidence in the first trial was, uh, you know, tainted.
Dr. Ben Sobel: Oh, I see.
Jelly: Anyway, two of the witnesses decided not to testify, uh, and the third guy, well, he commited suicide.
Dr. Ben Sobel: Oh? How?
Jelly: He stabbed himself in the back four times and threw himself off a bridge... very unfortunate
- Générique farfeluThere are outtakes shown during the end credits.
- ConnexionsFeatured in HBO First Look: The Making of 'Analyze That' (2002)
Commentaire en vedette
Analyze That is the sequel to Analyze This and again re-unites Robert DiNero and Billy Crystal. The story picks up right where Analyze This left off. Paul Vitti is in jail and when unknown people try and kill him, he realizes he must get out and get to those responsible for the attempts in murdering him, before they get to him. He fakes an illness and gets released into his former shrink, Ben Sobel's, care.
I enjoyed the first one. I thought it had a a few funny moments, great acting, and I just overall enjoyed it. I didn't see the point in a sequel. However, I also enjoyed this one. It wasn't as good as the first, by no means. But it was still alright.
Once again, it had funny moments and great acting, but I didn't buy into the premise, and some of the dialog was a bit hammy. However, I enjoyed it and, if you watch one, you might as well watch the other.
A solid 6/10
I enjoyed the first one. I thought it had a a few funny moments, great acting, and I just overall enjoyed it. I didn't see the point in a sequel. However, I also enjoyed this one. It wasn't as good as the first, by no means. But it was still alright.
Once again, it had funny moments and great acting, but I didn't buy into the premise, and some of the dialog was a bit hammy. However, I enjoyed it and, if you watch one, you might as well watch the other.
A solid 6/10
- PadraigWalshFilm
- 4 août 2012
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Analyze That
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 60 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 32 130 627 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 11 034 422 $ US
- 8 déc. 2002
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 55 003 135 $ US
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant