ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,8/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueEarly in his crime-solving career, Sherlock Holmes attempts to prevent Moriarty from cornering the heroin market.Early in his crime-solving career, Sherlock Holmes attempts to prevent Moriarty from cornering the heroin market.Early in his crime-solving career, Sherlock Holmes attempts to prevent Moriarty from cornering the heroin market.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Sandu Mihai Gruia
- Dr. Cruickshank
- (as Mihai Gruia Sandu)
Constantin Barbulescu
- Captor #1
- (as Costi Barbulescu)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAs Sherlock and Mycroft describe a man on the street during their 'old game', the dialogue is taken practically word for word from Arthur Conan Doyle's short story 'The Greek Interpreter', which introduced Mycroft.
- GaffesWhen Holmes and the police search the home of a suspected murderer at the beginning of the show, they are using battery-powered flashlights in 1886. They are in fact using carbide lamps...similar to what miners used in the same period.
Commentaire en vedette
I recently watched this film and was amased at how bad it was. I am a great fan of Sherlock Holmes and have read all the books and seen most films produced, this interpretation was NOT him.
I found the use of CGI pathetic as it was obvious, his drinking habits were confusing (he drank a bottle of vodka, a bottle of red wine and then half a bottle of absinth which would have made him blind), he slept with four women (two at the same time) and still somehow managed to save the day.
Mycroft was played by one of my favourite actors but even he couldn't save the show. He is portrayed as a cripple who is frightened to go out. Mycroft is supposed to be a strong minded person who works for the government.
Watson was the best of the lot, but i don't remember him being a mortician, also he should have been in the war.
The biggest gaff I found was that they took a scene from "Hands of a Murderer" and made a couple of adjustments but it was still the same scene, didn't they have anything better to do?
I would tell anyone who is considering watching this not to bother unless you are doing it for free and have nothing better to do, this is not for Sherlockians!
I found the use of CGI pathetic as it was obvious, his drinking habits were confusing (he drank a bottle of vodka, a bottle of red wine and then half a bottle of absinth which would have made him blind), he slept with four women (two at the same time) and still somehow managed to save the day.
Mycroft was played by one of my favourite actors but even he couldn't save the show. He is portrayed as a cripple who is frightened to go out. Mycroft is supposed to be a strong minded person who works for the government.
Watson was the best of the lot, but i don't remember him being a mortician, also he should have been in the war.
The biggest gaff I found was that they took a scene from "Hands of a Murderer" and made a couple of adjustments but it was still the same scene, didn't they have anything better to do?
I would tell anyone who is considering watching this not to bother unless you are doing it for free and have nothing better to do, this is not for Sherlockians!
- caswelll
- 13 mars 2004
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Sherlock: Case of Evil
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 6 000 000 $ US (estimation)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant