Lorsqu'il découvre que ses supérieurs organisent un dîner célébrant l'idiotie de leurs invités, un cadre prometteur s'interroge à ce sujet lorsqu'il est invité. Au même moment, il se lie d'a... Tout lireLorsqu'il découvre que ses supérieurs organisent un dîner célébrant l'idiotie de leurs invités, un cadre prometteur s'interroge à ce sujet lorsqu'il est invité. Au même moment, il se lie d'amitié avec un homme qui serait l'invité parfait.Lorsqu'il découvre que ses supérieurs organisent un dîner célébrant l'idiotie de leurs invités, un cadre prometteur s'interroge à ce sujet lorsqu'il est invité. Au même moment, il se lie d'amitié avec un homme qui serait l'invité parfait.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Chris O'Dowd
- Marco - Blind Swordsman
- (as Christopher O'Dowd)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOne of the film's writers, David Guion, was on set one day and noticed that Steve Carell was left handed. "I didn't know you were left handed" he remarked to the actor. "I'm not", replied Carell, "but my character is".
- GaffesDarla and Barry throw a bottle of wine on the door in Tim's apartment. In the next shot the mess from the wine has disappeared.
- Générique farfeluAfter the credits, A diorama is displayed of a stuffed mouse sitting in a burnt down house, with Barry heard laughing as he reveals that Fender's company has gone bust with Forbes Magazine naming him the "World's Biggest Loser."
- Autres versionsTrifecta-syndicated airings made two notable edits to the brunch scene:
- The napkin reads "I'M HOT", instead of "I'M WET".
- Barry's echo of Müeller's "Join yourself to her, in the name of love" is omitted, presumably because Barry could be interpreted as mocking Müeller's accent.
- Bandes originalesThe Fool on the Hill
Written by John Lennon & Paul McCartney
Performed by The Beatles
Courtesy of Capitol Records LLC
Under license from EMI Film & Television Music
[Played over both the opening and end credits]
Commentaire en vedette
Just finished watching "Dinner for Schmucks". To me it's a typical rom-com, but there's this weird guy in it that steals the show. I really liked the "mice"-en-scenes, the ones at the dinner were lame, but the scenes Barry recreated from his marriage were beautiful in an odd way. I liked Steve Carell, as Barry, because surprisingly of all the over the top characters in this movie, he was the most believable and lovable and I'm not a fan. It took me a lot of time to like him in "The Office", but thanks to Comedy Central over here in Holland and after a lot of sleepless nights with absolutely nothing else to watch, he kind of grew on me. Zach Galifianakis character was great too, but the only things that had me laughing out loud was some of the slapstick. S o was it a good movie? Yes, enjoyable enough for a Sunday afternoon. I tried to watch the original "Le dinner du cons" before I saw this remake but I couldn't stand it, because of the slow pace. Now I have seen the remake and was pleasantly surprised, I just had to watch the original, because everyone keeps saying it's so much better. I used to love Louis de Funes and the Pink Panther movies when I was a boy (and yes I know Clouseau wasn't really French!), so I gave it another go. I was happy to see Jacques Villeret, the sidekick of Louis de Funes in a couple of movies, but I guess that's also the problem. He needs someone else to shine and he didn't really on his own. The dialogs were more tongue in cheek than laugh out loud funny and I really feel sorry for people who think this is the funniest movie ever
I was also very disappointed that the actual dinner wasn't in the movie, because I expected the French to outshine the remake in it. So if you like Steve Carell you'll love this movie and as a remake I think it did improve on the original even though they gave it a typical Hollywood ending. If you really want to see a train wreck of a remake, I still think Louis de Funes' "Oscar" by Sly Stallone is the worst remake ever!
- elroy_geronimo
- 1 déc. 2010
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Dinner for Schmucks?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Dinner for Schmucks
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 69 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 73 026 337 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 23 527 839 $ US
- 1 août 2010
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 86 855 739 $ US
- Durée1 heure 54 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What was the official certification given to Le dîner de cons (2010) in India?
Répondre