Jack Ryan, en tant que jeune analyste secret de la CIA, découvre un complot russe visant à écraser l'économie américaine avec une attaque terroriste.Jack Ryan, en tant que jeune analyste secret de la CIA, découvre un complot russe visant à écraser l'économie américaine avec une attaque terroriste.Jack Ryan, en tant que jeune analyste secret de la CIA, découvre un complot russe visant à écraser l'économie américaine avec une attaque terroriste.
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen asked about the possibility of a sequel to this movie, star Chris Pine replied: "No. I don't think it made enough money for that to happen. That's one of my deep regrets, that we didn't totally get that right."
- GaffesThe strip mall supposedly in Dearborn, Michigan, has a shop that displays a UK National Lottery sign above one of the shops.
- Citations
Jack Ryan: [to Harper, while arguing with Cathy] Can we have a... a-a-a minute, please ?
William Harper: No, you can't.
Cathy Muller: I would like to talk to Jack alone.
William Harper: This is geopolitics. It's not couples therapy.
- Générique farfeluThe title of the film doesn't appear until 12 minutes into the movie.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Film '72: Episode dated 21 January 2014 (2014)
- Bandes originalesSorry, Wrong Number Prelude
Written by Franz Waxman
From the motion picture Un Tueur au Bout du Fil (1948)
Commentaire en vedette
It's ironic that "Jack Ryan" is part of the title for this one because this is the furthest from the character that any of the films have been. Beyond a some what similar back-story, the doctor soon to be wife, and that he works for the CIA, Ryan is not Ryan. They turn him more into a spy/field agent than the brainy analyst that he's meant to be. As a result, there is nothing in this movie that makes it stand out from the rest of it's genre. It's just another spy movie with an over the top villain that's plotting world domination. It's predictable and generic. They sacrificed what made the Jack Ryan character unique.
I'm not saying that the movie didn't work as some Bond/Bourne/Mission Impossible wannabe with bits and pieces slapped together from every spy thriller ever made. It captured successful elements from those films pretty well. It's just a shame that they relied on recycling tired and over used narrative when there is still a bunch of great Ryan books that they have yet to adapt. There should be no reason to slap together this films story when a much more talented writer like Clancy still has more stories to draw from. I agree with Peter Travers comment "It's a product constructed out of spare parts and assembled with computerized precision."
Despite following a predictable formula very closely instead of the source material, the movie still works as entertainment. Chris Pine is great, despite the writers failing him, and he really carries the movie. He could be a great Jack Ryan if they actually wrote the character correctly. Branagh delivers a pretty good villain, even though he's more suited for a Bond film. There are a couple of scenes that deliver good suspense. It's just not a Jack Ryan movie. It seems that they only used Jack Ryan for the brand name rather than faithfully trying to tell a story about him.
I'm not saying that the movie didn't work as some Bond/Bourne/Mission Impossible wannabe with bits and pieces slapped together from every spy thriller ever made. It captured successful elements from those films pretty well. It's just a shame that they relied on recycling tired and over used narrative when there is still a bunch of great Ryan books that they have yet to adapt. There should be no reason to slap together this films story when a much more talented writer like Clancy still has more stories to draw from. I agree with Peter Travers comment "It's a product constructed out of spare parts and assembled with computerized precision."
Despite following a predictable formula very closely instead of the source material, the movie still works as entertainment. Chris Pine is great, despite the writers failing him, and he really carries the movie. He could be a great Jack Ryan if they actually wrote the character correctly. Branagh delivers a pretty good villain, even though he's more suited for a Bond film. There are a couple of scenes that deliver good suspense. It's just not a Jack Ryan movie. It seems that they only used Jack Ryan for the brand name rather than faithfully trying to tell a story about him.
- thefilmguy7
- 18 janv. 2014
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
- Lieux de tournage
- Liverpool, Merseyside, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(the night time car chase through the streets of 'Moscow' was filmed in Liverpool city centre. The 'Manhattan' tunnel to which Ryan tracks the real terrorist plot is the entrance to the Queensway Tunnel. The Theatre is Liverpool Town Hall, and the final foot chase is around the Royal Liver Building in Water Street)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 60 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 50 577 412 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 15 451 981 $ US
- 19 janv. 2014
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 135 503 748 $ US
- Durée1 heure 45 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the streaming release date of Jack Ryan: Recrue dans l'ombre (2014) in Italy?
Répondre