Une comédie sur les expériences d'un groupe de filles d'une vingtaine d'années.Une comédie sur les expériences d'un groupe de filles d'une vingtaine d'années.Une comédie sur les expériences d'un groupe de filles d'une vingtaine d'années.
- A remporté 2 prix Primetime Emmy
- 19 victoires et 135 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe character of Shoshanna wasn't supposed to be recurring, but creator Lena Dunham liked Zosia Mamet's performance so much that kept her on the show as a regular, because they saw potential for exploring the character thanks to Mamet's talent.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Conan: Where in Carmen Sandiego Is Waldo? (2012)
Commentaire en vedette
In the 2012 male dominated world of TV shows, Girls has been a welcomed addition.
The fact that its main character is also the show's creator, writer and often director, makes it even more welcome. But, as an avid consumer of films and TV, I cannot rate Girls more than 6 (and I am being generous for the previous reasons).
The most obvious comparisons to Lena Dunham's "Girls" is Sex & the City, both because of its 4 female leads living in NYC , and because of the emphasis on friendship and relashionsips. However, to me, Girls is more similar to any mumblecore movie (think Noah Baumbach's Frances Ha) or to a certain extent TV shows like Freak and Geeks or Love (unsurprisingly, Judd Apatow is an exec producer). Ordinary stories about ordinary people with ordinary feelings and ordinary ideas who somehow believe to be extraordinary.
The show is well crafted, the acting is good, and the characters are believable, but like the whole mumblecore genre, it is too focused on the inner life of middle class, self obsessed, ordinary people and so it risks to be just as boring as the people it tries to portray.
I do applaud Lena Dunham's courage in exposing her imperfect naked body and inner psychological issues, especially given the abuse she had to go through (even on this website with some of the reviews gratuitously cruel). However, I doubt that is enough to make good TV for a sustained period of time.
Interestingly for a show written by a girl for other girls, the male characters (Adam, Ray) are a lot more interesting and have a lot more life in them than any of the female characters, except for Hannah. While the boys in the show have interests and thoughts,the girls are defined by their relationships with men (or lack thereof). We learn more about the internal life and motivations of
a marginal character like Thomas John in his two minute monologue than about Marnie or Jessa during the entire first season.
It's true that except for Carrie, the characters in sex & the city were also fairly thin, but that show was a hell of a lot more fun.
Finally, since Lena Dunham is now heralded as the bulwark of modern feminism, does it really matter if the writer/director/producer of a show is a woman when the female characters she creates are so thin?
- cesiraurzi
- 18 mai 2018
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée28 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant