Une bande de podcasteurs décide d'enquêter sur d'anciennes disparitions mystérieuses dans une ville pittoresque d'Irlande qui cache de noirs et terribles secrets.Une bande de podcasteurs décide d'enquêter sur d'anciennes disparitions mystérieuses dans une ville pittoresque d'Irlande qui cache de noirs et terribles secrets.Une bande de podcasteurs décide d'enquêter sur d'anciennes disparitions mystérieuses dans une ville pittoresque d'Irlande qui cache de noirs et terribles secrets.
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMrs. O'Shea's house is also seen in Bad Sisters as the Garvey sisters family home that Eva lives in
- GaffesMen and women wouldn't share a police cell, and you wouldn't be allowed possessions such as a recorder in your cell.
Commentaire en vedette
I feel compelled to review some of the reviewers of this quirky, well written and acted caper in order to set the record straight.
Anyone who attempts to compare it to 'Broadchurch, 'Unforgotten' or 'CSI' has truly missed the point. It's more in the genre of 'Dead Like Me' and 'Hot Fuzz' or even 'Only Murders in the Building' only darker and with less deadpan and slapstick humor.
One who gave it a 1 rating because a dog was shot begs belief. Plus they argued it was seen writhing in blood and was purely gratuitous without contributing anything to the story. This couldn't be further from the truth. It was basically killed 'off camera' and exposed exactly what that violent family was all about. It also confirmed that they would have killed Seamus' brother and Fiona had they found them years earlier. It was a shocking and senseless act on their part which proved they meant business in their hunt for Seamus. I, for one, totally expected it. It also gave us another opportunity to witness the softer side of Seamus.
This, plus all the other low scores, don't affect it's well-deserved 7 as a show worthy of at least checking out. It's compact so it's a great binge-watch. It's either your cup of tea or it isn't.
This original series takes the viewer through many plot twists and turns with lots of red herrings and cliff hangers at the end of each episode that leave the viewer wanting more. Towards the end of episode 5, which revealed a lot of answers, I was hoping there would be more and was very happy to see the Netflix info that there were two more episodes to go.
The basic premise has been well documented by other reviewers. A positive, upbeat one-hit-wonder American podcaster (David Wilmot) who, in spite of a flagging career and financial and marital problems comes to the ficticuous west coast Irish town of Bodkin to document a 25yr old missing persons mystery.
Three people went missing during their annual pagan festival and he hopes a closer investigation of the facts for his podcast will renew his fame. He never anticipates solving the mystery but with the aid of his young, wide-eyed novice researcher (Robyn Cara) and the addition of a disgraced investigative journalist from the 'Guardian' (Siobhan Cullen), they begin to dig deeper into the mystery. She smells a real story and although her boss just wanted her to lay low with these guys to avoid censure for her part in the suicide of a whistleblower she was working with, she can't help herself getting them deeply involved and taking the podcast to a whole new level.
There are as many real life elements as stereo-typical and ludicrous ones which keep this show darting between mysterious drama and dark humor. I, personally, would have liked it to have been a bit more obviously humorous but the mystery unfolds in such surprising ways I was still hooked.
I disagree with others who felt the reveals were anti-climatic ... I think they worked well with the pacing and tone...but I have to admit I was disappointed with the ending. I wanted different outcomes for the three musketeers but that's colored by my set of values and by the fact I may have begun to take it all a bit too seriously.
It's been difficult to try to describe this inventive series without giving away any spoilers.
The acting was great from the whole ensemble, the writing clever and inventive, the pacing was a bit chaotic and the scenes a bit choppy at times but not nearly as much as in 'Hot Fuzz' which I really loved but felt it was often like different movies cobbled together in the way they switched from slick 'The Borne Identity' scenes to 'Midsomer Murders' at it's best. This was not the case here but the introduction of the incompetent and OTT Interpol agents certainly are a case in point. The show would slow down and speed up awkwardly at times and often the humor following a serious or personally revealing scene just didn't quite work for me. I wonder if the lack of fluidity was somewhat related to the switch in directors during the series. This is normal in episode fiction but perhaps a few of these directors were not as capable of keeping the delicate balance and continuity of this specific style of show as well as others. I think you have to be aware this is not going to be your typical true crime mystery series and stick with it past episodes one and two. You're in for a treat... or at least a very different viewing experience.
Anyone who attempts to compare it to 'Broadchurch, 'Unforgotten' or 'CSI' has truly missed the point. It's more in the genre of 'Dead Like Me' and 'Hot Fuzz' or even 'Only Murders in the Building' only darker and with less deadpan and slapstick humor.
One who gave it a 1 rating because a dog was shot begs belief. Plus they argued it was seen writhing in blood and was purely gratuitous without contributing anything to the story. This couldn't be further from the truth. It was basically killed 'off camera' and exposed exactly what that violent family was all about. It also confirmed that they would have killed Seamus' brother and Fiona had they found them years earlier. It was a shocking and senseless act on their part which proved they meant business in their hunt for Seamus. I, for one, totally expected it. It also gave us another opportunity to witness the softer side of Seamus.
This, plus all the other low scores, don't affect it's well-deserved 7 as a show worthy of at least checking out. It's compact so it's a great binge-watch. It's either your cup of tea or it isn't.
This original series takes the viewer through many plot twists and turns with lots of red herrings and cliff hangers at the end of each episode that leave the viewer wanting more. Towards the end of episode 5, which revealed a lot of answers, I was hoping there would be more and was very happy to see the Netflix info that there were two more episodes to go.
The basic premise has been well documented by other reviewers. A positive, upbeat one-hit-wonder American podcaster (David Wilmot) who, in spite of a flagging career and financial and marital problems comes to the ficticuous west coast Irish town of Bodkin to document a 25yr old missing persons mystery.
Three people went missing during their annual pagan festival and he hopes a closer investigation of the facts for his podcast will renew his fame. He never anticipates solving the mystery but with the aid of his young, wide-eyed novice researcher (Robyn Cara) and the addition of a disgraced investigative journalist from the 'Guardian' (Siobhan Cullen), they begin to dig deeper into the mystery. She smells a real story and although her boss just wanted her to lay low with these guys to avoid censure for her part in the suicide of a whistleblower she was working with, she can't help herself getting them deeply involved and taking the podcast to a whole new level.
There are as many real life elements as stereo-typical and ludicrous ones which keep this show darting between mysterious drama and dark humor. I, personally, would have liked it to have been a bit more obviously humorous but the mystery unfolds in such surprising ways I was still hooked.
I disagree with others who felt the reveals were anti-climatic ... I think they worked well with the pacing and tone...but I have to admit I was disappointed with the ending. I wanted different outcomes for the three musketeers but that's colored by my set of values and by the fact I may have begun to take it all a bit too seriously.
It's been difficult to try to describe this inventive series without giving away any spoilers.
The acting was great from the whole ensemble, the writing clever and inventive, the pacing was a bit chaotic and the scenes a bit choppy at times but not nearly as much as in 'Hot Fuzz' which I really loved but felt it was often like different movies cobbled together in the way they switched from slick 'The Borne Identity' scenes to 'Midsomer Murders' at it's best. This was not the case here but the introduction of the incompetent and OTT Interpol agents certainly are a case in point. The show would slow down and speed up awkwardly at times and often the humor following a serious or personally revealing scene just didn't quite work for me. I wonder if the lack of fluidity was somewhat related to the switch in directors during the series. This is normal in episode fiction but perhaps a few of these directors were not as capable of keeping the delicate balance and continuity of this specific style of show as well as others. I think you have to be aware this is not going to be your typical true crime mystery series and stick with it past episodes one and two. You're in for a treat... or at least a very different viewing experience.
- ronalamont-91472
- 27 mai 2024
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Alien: Romulus to Road House, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2024.
- How many seasons does Bodkin have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée45 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant