Diablo

I decided to this watch this one because I like Scott Adkins and action movies. Both Adkins and Marko Zaror were also in one of my favorite movies, John Wick 4

The movie isn't a masterpiece. There are a ton of cliches. The premise is a little shaky. The film could've offered more about the background of Scott Adkins' character. The girl Elisa is adorable at times, but her acting is quite bad at certain points, particularly when her character has to be distressed. While Adkins and Zaror steal the show, the Vincenzo character is a weak link

That said - the movie has some A+ action scenes. The fights between Adkins and Zaror, in particular, are right there with the best of them. Adkins' character is likable and easy to get behind.

It's a great popcorn movie

6.5/10.

Diablo isn't breaking new ground in the story department-revenge, betrayal, and brooding antiheroes are all here in familiar form-but what it does deliver is sharp execution, literally and figuratively.

Scott Adkins does what Scott Adkins does best: move like a damn machine and make the action look brutally efficient. The fight choreography is tight, fluid, and creatively staged, and the camera work actually does it justice (no shaky cam nonsense or hyper-edits). Action fans will be happy.

Big shoutout to the actress who plays Elissa-she brings a level of intensity and emotional grounding that elevates every scene she's in. While the plot's a bit vanilla, her performance is legit, and I hope to see her in more leading roles down the line.

Not a game-changer, but if you're here for adrenaline and clean fight sequences, Diablo delivers.

I thought Alanna De La Rossa was excellent, despite a few wobbles. She portrayed some endearing qualities through her character, which were entirely miscast: churlish whimsy doesn't gel with pistol whipping baddies. Scott Adkins didn't have much more than a one-dimensional character, he was there for the fighting in which he excelled.

If you are into martial arts and nicely choreographed fight scenes, this is for you. If you are looking for a coherent story with at least a modicum of plausibility, steer clear. From the start to the finish, you need to not so much suspend disbelief, but pack it in a box and ship it to a small village in Outer Mongolia with instructions that it is buried at least 12 feet underground.

Diablo, starring Scott Adkins, feels like one of those movies you stumble upon when you've run out of options - and honestly, that's when it's best watched. The storyline is thin and predictable, with little emotional depth or originality. It leans heavily on clichés, and the script doesn't do much to keep you engaged beyond the basics.

However, as expected from a Scott Adkins film, the fight choreography delivers some solid moments. A few well-executed action sequences stand out and showcase Adkins' martial arts skills, giving the film a bit of pulse. But even the action feels a bit underused, with pacing issues and underwhelming direction holding it back.

In short, Diablo is far from memorable, but if you're in the mood for some casual fight scenes and don't care much about story or dialogue, it might serve as a decent time-killer.

I couldn't resist my desire to watch it till the end and the only reason behind it was the very well done work by the camera crew and the DP... What else would you suggest an action movie than giving you a perfectly edited sequence of a realistic fight?

A perfect example of praised cinematography...