Ett ärligt liv

This attempt of intellectual filmmaking fails so hard it's rather impressive. After 45 minutes of running time I just want to shout out, please please please stop meandering and start telling an engaging story.

Instead its greatest achievement, which it completely succeed in delivering is - boring the h-ll of the audience. Not for a single moment do I care or wonder where the split is taking me - it's beyond boring actually. It's dull.

Not even the impressive budget for famous music tracks can make up for this absolute dud of movie.

I had very low expectations for this movie but somehow I really like it. A few actors stand out, Simon (Simon Lööf) and Carles (Peter Andersson).

Without spoiling anything, this is an original movie with some thrilling parts and some dramatic parts. And even though it's special and not for everyone, it never felt boring.

I also really like the soundtrack. For a low budget movie there's a bunch of nice tracks that I didn't expect.

Worth a watch!

This films has two huge problems: 1. That they kill the innocent poor housemaid in the rich house for no reason 2. That they kill the innocent receptionist in the hotel for no reason.

This destroys any political message, because the anarchist group turns into moronic psycho killers, that have zero ideals.

The rich and wealthy actually become the ones we as an audience side with. They may be arrogant snobs, and don't deserve their wealth, but at least they don't run around and kill poor innocent chilenean housemaids for no reason.

Hence the message is: Anarchists are bad people folks. Billionaires are fine. Isn't the owner of Netflix a billionaire? He's gonna like this movie. This message doesn't take a lot of courage. The people in power will congratulate you and finance your next movie, Mikael, well done. The billionaires association salutes you. How about a free weekend in our new swedish golf resort?

The main character is also quite boring. He's a cork in the water, which always bad for any hero of any movie. He's also opportunistic and a passive loser that just reacts, never acts, until the very end, but it's too late than.

I really understand why he's smiling in the end. He just let a group that murdered two people. Doesn't he at least feel some remorse? What about the children who lost their mother? Sorry, but what a terrible prick.

Besides that, how stupid is the police in this movie? The burglers entered the house with a key, where did they get the key from? The police saw the face of the girl when they stopped the van. Why is her phantom picture not all over the news? In reality they would catch them within two days.

One of those Netflix movies that you watch because it's free and there just nothing better on. But you watch it with your remote in the hand, and half of the time you scroll fast forward.

This anarchist that the movie refers to time and again, he's gonna turn in his grave over that piece.

This is a drama and action movie about a new law student who is drawn from his studies into a anarchist type group.

Entertaining enough and it illustrates the "them" and "us" between those who have plenty of money and those who do not.

The elder in the anarchist group is really what can be called a "champagne socialist".

The story has sufficient action and a sort of morality to it keeping the viewer engaged.

It is a Swedish picture dubbed into English.

Worth a look!

6 and a half rounded up=

7/10.

This movie was good, but could have been better just with the right script. The writers should have put more drama and distinction between rich and the masses and a kind of revolt in the main character. He just stays too nordic. The filming is top notch. Meanwhile characters are well played. Scenes are good also and flowing nicely.