NOTE IMDb
3,7/10
2,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA former vaudevillian gifted at impersonation assists a mad scientist in reanimating corpses and soon goes mad himself.A former vaudevillian gifted at impersonation assists a mad scientist in reanimating corpses and soon goes mad himself.A former vaudevillian gifted at impersonation assists a mad scientist in reanimating corpses and soon goes mad himself.
Horace B. Carpenter
- Dr. Meirschultz
- (as Horace Carpenter)
Thea Ramsey
- Alice Maxwell
- (as Theo Ramsey)
Marvelle Andre
- Marvel
- (as Marvel Andre)
John P. Wade
- Embalmer
- (as J.P. Wade)
Marian Constance Blackton
- Neighbor
- (as Marion Blackton)
Umberto Guarracino
- Pluto
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Bartolomeo Pagano
- Maciste
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Satan
- Satan the Cat
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSeveral key cast members are uncredited, and their identities remain unknown, most notably "Goof" the cat-hoarding neighbor, the detective, the skinny morgue attendant, Maria Altura (who Dr. Meirschultz brings back to life), and Altura's body double (for scenes requiring nudity).
- GaffesWhen Maxwell drags Dr. Meirshultz down the basement stairs, they are both wearing Dr. Meirshultz' glasses, even though they only had one pair of glasses to begin with.
- ConnexionsFeatured in It Came from Hollywood (1982)
Commentaire à la une
The longer I live the more surprising things I see. Here's a movie from the '30's that has bare boobs, gore and a shot of a man popping a cat's eye out. I don't know if it was real--the cat didn't seem to mind much so I doubt it was.
This has the feel of an Ed Wood exploitation opus--all over the place story-wise (a guy impersonates a mad doctor to promote his own mad ideas and a lot of people aren't thrilled with it, and some end up dead). It's clearly an exploitation film--it takes place in one room and plot is forsaken in favor of grisly ideas and action, deception, slutty women and over-the-top acting. Like many movies from this era it's too slow and grainy for most people to enjoy and certainly too poorly made to recommend, and the rewards are slim. I'd keep the fast-forward handy and the alcohol too--the title placards that try to legitimize the movie by suggesting it's an essay on different forms of madness is pointless and irritating, really.
The best news is that it's short and there's more action than talking--too bad more movies aren't like that these days. Oh, and there's the oddity of an actress named "Phyllis Diller" being in it, no relation to the wild-haired 60's stand-up comic, of course.
This has the feel of an Ed Wood exploitation opus--all over the place story-wise (a guy impersonates a mad doctor to promote his own mad ideas and a lot of people aren't thrilled with it, and some end up dead). It's clearly an exploitation film--it takes place in one room and plot is forsaken in favor of grisly ideas and action, deception, slutty women and over-the-top acting. Like many movies from this era it's too slow and grainy for most people to enjoy and certainly too poorly made to recommend, and the rewards are slim. I'd keep the fast-forward handy and the alcohol too--the title placards that try to legitimize the movie by suggesting it's an essay on different forms of madness is pointless and irritating, really.
The best news is that it's short and there's more action than talking--too bad more movies aren't like that these days. Oh, and there's the oddity of an actress named "Phyllis Diller" being in it, no relation to the wild-haired 60's stand-up comic, of course.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Maniac?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée51 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant