Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTwo gold-digging process servers are tasked with subpoenaing one's boyfriend, who has been using a pseudonym to avoid breach-of-promise servings and suits.Two gold-digging process servers are tasked with subpoenaing one's boyfriend, who has been using a pseudonym to avoid breach-of-promise servings and suits.Two gold-digging process servers are tasked with subpoenaing one's boyfriend, who has been using a pseudonym to avoid breach-of-promise servings and suits.
Joseph Crehan
- Undetermined Secondary Role
- (scènes coupées)
Mayo Methot
- Undetermined Secondary Role
- (scènes coupées)
Chief Little Wolf
- Chief Pontiac
- (as Myron Cox)
Walter Brennan
- Wedding Witness
- (non crédité)
Harlan Briggs
- Justice of the Peace
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFourth of five films pairing Joan Blondell and Glenda Farrell released by Warner Brothers from 1933-35. The others being Havana Widows (1933), Kansas City Princess (1934), Femmes d'affaires (1935), and Miss Pacific Fleet (1935).
- GaffesWhen Ginger dives off the yacht back into the water; Lawyer Dismore advises Courtney to jump in and bring her back on board because the summons isn't legal until she gets back onshore and signs it. If this is so then it doesn't make sense when a few minutes earlier Dismore tells the sailors to throw her overboard after it is revealed that she is a process server and had just served Courtney with papers.
- Citations
Dixie Tilton: Come on, get in. We've got things to do.
Ginger Stewart: I've been doing things.
- Bandes originalesThe Gold Diggers' Song (We're in the Money)
(1933) (uncredited)
Music by Harry Warren
Lyrics by Al Dubin
Played during the opening credits and often as background music
Partially sung or hummed by Glenda Farrell, Joan Blondell and Hugh Herbert at various times
Commentaire à la une
This is one of the better of all those very similar Blondell and Farrell comedies of the mid thirties. It's not brilliant but some thought and effort have gone into this one and the cast seem to be enjoying themselves - that lets us enjoy watching them. These days those pictures would probably have been made as a tv sit-com - they've got a comforting familiarity about them which makes you want to see them all but they do tend to merge into one.....except MISS PACIFIC FLEET which is truly awful.
This one has quite an interesting twisty plot, a lovely upbeat feel to it and some genuinely funny moments. Joan and Glenda both exude warmth and charm and are instantly likeable. Glenda and of course Joan are both gorgeous so are also instantly watchable. Being made after the infamous production code was enforced however means that Joan Blondell is a little more conservatively dressed than in her earlier films but she's still got the sexiest smile anyone's ever had.
It only lasts just over an hour so it's all quite lively but there is a lot of Hugh Herbert who does seem to repeat the same scene several times. He is funny in small doses but perhaps he's in this just a little too much. That same befuddled character he always plays does tend to wear a bit thin after a while. He's still just about amusing in this very silly, very fun little picture.
This one has quite an interesting twisty plot, a lovely upbeat feel to it and some genuinely funny moments. Joan and Glenda both exude warmth and charm and are instantly likeable. Glenda and of course Joan are both gorgeous so are also instantly watchable. Being made after the infamous production code was enforced however means that Joan Blondell is a little more conservatively dressed than in her earlier films but she's still got the sexiest smile anyone's ever had.
It only lasts just over an hour so it's all quite lively but there is a lot of Hugh Herbert who does seem to repeat the same scene several times. He is funny in small doses but perhaps he's in this just a little too much. That same befuddled character he always plays does tend to wear a bit thin after a while. He's still just about amusing in this very silly, very fun little picture.
- 1930s_Time_Machine
- 27 mars 2023
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is We're in the Money?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Dinheiro em Penca
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 6 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was We're in the Money (1935) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre