Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueJack, a sailor, persistently pursues Joan with gifts and marriage trickery despite her rejections. After marrying under false pretenses, Joan leaves Jack. He then tries to win her back amids... Tout lireJack, a sailor, persistently pursues Joan with gifts and marriage trickery despite her rejections. After marrying under false pretenses, Joan leaves Jack. He then tries to win her back amidst rocky circumstances.Jack, a sailor, persistently pursues Joan with gifts and marriage trickery despite her rejections. After marrying under false pretenses, Joan leaves Jack. He then tries to win her back amidst rocky circumstances.
Robert Adair
- Seaman Collecting Pay
- (non crédité)
Alice Belcher
- London Wharf Floozie
- (non crédité)
Daisy Belmore
- Canadian Queen Passenger
- (non crédité)
Herbert Evans
- Ship's Officer
- (non crédité)
John George
- Dwarf
- (non crédité)
Tiny Jones
- Pub Customer
- (non crédité)
Sôjin Kamiyama
- Singapore Brothel Proprietor
- (non crédité)
Lena Malena
- Singapore Party Girl
- (non crédité)
Ray Milland
- Ship's Officer
- (non crédité)
Toshia Mori
- Singapore Party Girl
- (non crédité)
Pat Moriarity
- Seaman
- (non crédité)
Desmond Roberts
- Canadian Queen Captain
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe system of rigging used to transfer the men from one ship to the other during the rescue is called a "breeches buoy."
- ConnexionsAlternate-language version of En cada puerto un amor (1931)
Commentaire à la une
Way for a Sailor (1930)
** (out of 4)
Early talkie from MGM suffers from a lot of technical issues and the story really lets down the cast. In the film a drunken sailor (John Gilbert) argues with his buddy (Wallace Beery) but soon falls for a questionable woman (Leila Hyams). Soon Gilbert is trying to win her heart but she doesn't want a sailor so the man must try and form a new life but finds out he is what he is. According to legend MGM was really sticking it to Gilbert and trying to ruin him with movies like this. I'm really not sure how true that is because legend also has it that he had a horrible speaking voice but the more sound films I watch I'm starting to realize that wasn't the case at all. In fact, I think the sometimes soft-toned voice perfectly fits some of these rough characters he's playing because he had the body of a tough guy but that voice allows him to work well in the more romantic sequences. In fact, during one of the love scenes he's saying one love line after another and it was actually quite effective as he was clearly very passionate and this really come through on screen. I'm not sure what people in 1930 were expecting but I can only guess that silent movies had people imagining what their favorite stars sounded like and when talkies came along and these voices didn't match, people were left disappointed. Either way, Gilbert is the only reason to watch this film as everything else is pretty bad. Hyams to me was way too flat and I really didn't care too much for the character or performance. Beery isn't too bad but he's pretty much just here to start fights, drink and be loud. We get Ray Milland in a brief, uncredited bit but the rest of the supporting cast are pretty forgettable. I think the biggest problem is the actual screenplay, which is quite boring, predictable and at times laughable. You really can't blame it too much as many of these early talkies were simply made for talking. The story never really progressive in a believable way and by the time it is over you can't help but feel you've been watching it for hours. The technical quality is another disaster as there are several scenes taking place outdoors where it's hard to hear what the actors are saying because of everything else the microphones are picking up. We also get some early rear-projection but it looks quite poor and often doesn't match up with the "real" footage. In the end, this isn't a disaster but it's certainly only recommended to those who want to see some of the Gilbert films that were laughed out of theaters back in the day.
** (out of 4)
Early talkie from MGM suffers from a lot of technical issues and the story really lets down the cast. In the film a drunken sailor (John Gilbert) argues with his buddy (Wallace Beery) but soon falls for a questionable woman (Leila Hyams). Soon Gilbert is trying to win her heart but she doesn't want a sailor so the man must try and form a new life but finds out he is what he is. According to legend MGM was really sticking it to Gilbert and trying to ruin him with movies like this. I'm really not sure how true that is because legend also has it that he had a horrible speaking voice but the more sound films I watch I'm starting to realize that wasn't the case at all. In fact, I think the sometimes soft-toned voice perfectly fits some of these rough characters he's playing because he had the body of a tough guy but that voice allows him to work well in the more romantic sequences. In fact, during one of the love scenes he's saying one love line after another and it was actually quite effective as he was clearly very passionate and this really come through on screen. I'm not sure what people in 1930 were expecting but I can only guess that silent movies had people imagining what their favorite stars sounded like and when talkies came along and these voices didn't match, people were left disappointed. Either way, Gilbert is the only reason to watch this film as everything else is pretty bad. Hyams to me was way too flat and I really didn't care too much for the character or performance. Beery isn't too bad but he's pretty much just here to start fights, drink and be loud. We get Ray Milland in a brief, uncredited bit but the rest of the supporting cast are pretty forgettable. I think the biggest problem is the actual screenplay, which is quite boring, predictable and at times laughable. You really can't blame it too much as many of these early talkies were simply made for talking. The story never really progressive in a believable way and by the time it is over you can't help but feel you've been watching it for hours. The technical quality is another disaster as there are several scenes taking place outdoors where it's hard to hear what the actors are saying because of everything else the microphones are picking up. We also get some early rear-projection but it looks quite poor and often doesn't match up with the "real" footage. In the end, this isn't a disaster but it's certainly only recommended to those who want to see some of the Gilbert films that were laughed out of theaters back in the day.
- Michael_Elliott
- 30 août 2010
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Way for a Sailor (1930) officially released in India in English?
Répondre