NOTE IMDb
7,0/10
9,2 k
MA NOTE
La vie physique temporaire du sauveur biblique, Jésus Christ.La vie physique temporaire du sauveur biblique, Jésus Christ.La vie physique temporaire du sauveur biblique, Jésus Christ.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Grégoire Aslan
- Herod
- (as Gregoire Aslan)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe crucifixion scene had to be re-shot because a preview audience was offended at Jesus having a hairy chest.
- GaffesThe killing of the newborns in Bethlehem is carried out by Roman soldiers. In reality the Roman Army had no units stationed in Judea until AD6, nine years after Herod the Great's death, when it became a full province of the Roman Empire rather than a client kingdom. Instead, the massacre would have been carried out by Herod's own troops, who were a mixture of Jews, Samaritans and foreign mercenaries.
- Citations
[Jesus is mending a chair for the Virgin Mary, but has to leave for Jerusalem]
Jesus: The chair will have to wait until I return.
Virgin Mary: [having a vague premonition of Jesus' arrest, trial and death] The chair will never be mended. I am going with you.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Manille (1975)
Commentaire à la une
The story of Jesus has been told many times from the very beginning of the movies, but this version, underrated when first released, is one of the best.
KING OF KINGS creates and sustains a dignified yet highly entertaining tone that is unique among biblical epics. The screenplay is extremely intelligent and effective, concentrating not just on Jesus, but on the society and personalities that surround him. Pilate, Caiaphas, Mary, John the Baptist, Mary Magdalene, the apostles, and a sublimely oversexed Salome are all well-drawn characters and well-cast, especially in contrast to the uncomfortable "superstar cameo" approach George Stevens used in his inferior "Greatest Story Ever Told".
The political background is well handled, making clear the wish of Judas and others that Jesus foment a revolution to free the Jews from Roman rule.
Handsome, myopic Jeffrey Hunter may not be a great actor, but his low-key, measured performance matches the overall design of the film very well. Orson Welles' rapt, mellifluous narration is a plus, as is Roschka's passionate musical score.
Definitely see this letter-boxed to appreciate the gorgeous scenery, photography, and spectacular scenes.
KING OF KINGS creates and sustains a dignified yet highly entertaining tone that is unique among biblical epics. The screenplay is extremely intelligent and effective, concentrating not just on Jesus, but on the society and personalities that surround him. Pilate, Caiaphas, Mary, John the Baptist, Mary Magdalene, the apostles, and a sublimely oversexed Salome are all well-drawn characters and well-cast, especially in contrast to the uncomfortable "superstar cameo" approach George Stevens used in his inferior "Greatest Story Ever Told".
The political background is well handled, making clear the wish of Judas and others that Jesus foment a revolution to free the Jews from Roman rule.
Handsome, myopic Jeffrey Hunter may not be a great actor, but his low-key, measured performance matches the overall design of the film very well. Orson Welles' rapt, mellifluous narration is a plus, as is Roschka's passionate musical score.
Definitely see this letter-boxed to appreciate the gorgeous scenery, photography, and spectacular scenes.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is King of Kings?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 037 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée2 heures 48 minutes
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le roi des rois (1961) officially released in India in English?
Répondre